Skip to main content

Windows NFS Client EUVDEUVD-2026-99669

| CVE-2026-70113 HIGH
Integer Overflow or Wraparound (CWE-190)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-4853-4w4x-6j7p
7.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privilege local access
  2. Delivery
    Invoke Client for NFS code path
  3. Exploit
    Trigger integer overflow (CWE-190)
  4. Execution
    Corrupt memory / execute code
  5. Impact
    Elevate to SYSTEM privileges

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Integer overflow checks
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the optional Windows 'Client for NFS' feature/role to be installed and reachable from the attacker's context - it is not enabled by default on most Windows client or server installations, which materially limits the exploitable population. The attacker must already have local, authenticated low-privilege code execution on the target host (CVSS PR:L, AV:L); there is no remote or network-facing exploitation path and no user interaction is needed (UI:N). The primary limiting factors are therefore the need for a pre-existing local foothold and the presence of the non-default NFS client component; hosts where this feature is absent are not exploitable via this flaw.

Impact

This is a credible but not top-priority local privilege-escalation issue. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 7.8) describes a locally-exploitable flaw requiring an attacker to already hold low-privilege authenticated access to the host, with low attack complexity and no user interaction, yielding total compromise (C:H/I:H/A:H) of the affected system once triggered. The CISA SSVC framework aligns with a measured posture: Exploitation=none (no observed exploitation), Automatable=no (consistent with a local vector that cannot be mass-scanned/wormed), but Technical Impact=total (consistent with the full C/I/A loss in the CVSS vector). No EPSS score was provided in the input, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified here. The CVE is NOT listed in CISA KEV and no public proof-of-concept is indicated, so this should be treated as a patch-on-normal-cycle elevation-of-privilege bug rather than an emergency: real priority is moderate, elevated mainly where low-privilege users share a host (multi-user servers, terminal/RDP hosts) or as a post-exploitation step in a chain. No signals conflict - the local vector, SSVC 'Automatable: no', and absence of KEV/POC are mutually consistent.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A local, low-privileged authenticated user (or malware running in that context) on a Windows system with the Client for NFS feature installed invokes the vulnerable NFS client code path with crafted input that triggers the integer overflow (CWE-190), corrupting memory to run code at a higher privilege level and gain SYSTEM-level control of the machine. No user interaction and no network position is required, but the attacker must already have a foothold on the host. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Local privilege escalation in Microsoft's Windows Client for NFS allows an authenticated low-privileged attacker who already has code execution on a host to elevate to higher privileges (assessed CVSS 3.1 vector AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, score 7.8). Exploitation requires the optional 'Client for NFS' feature to be installed and reachable from the attacker's context, so default installations without that component are not affected, and there is no remote or network-facing attack path. CISA's SSVC assessment records exploitation as 'none' and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis; Microsoft has released fixes via its update guide (MSRC advisory for CVE-2026-70113), and the issue is tracked as CWE-190 integer overflow or wraparound.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: apply the current Microsoft security updates referenced by the MSRC advisory for CVE-2026-70113 (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-70113), which bring affected builds up to the fixed levels published in EUVD-2026-99669 - for example Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.5761, Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.33650, Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.9376, Windows Server 2016/Windows 10 1607 10.0.14393.9612, Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.23470, Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.26434, Windows 10 21H2/22H2 10.0.19044.7807, Windows 11 23H2 10.0.22631.7652, 24H2 10.0.26100.9711, 25H2 10.0.26200.9711, 26H1 10.0.28000.3231 and 26H2 10.0.26300.9711; prioritize hosts where the optional Client for NFS feature is actually installed, since the exploitable population is limited to those. Where patching must be deferred, the most effective compensating control is to remove the attack surface rather than harden it: uninstall/disable the Client for NFS optional feature via Settings > Optional features or 'DISM /Online /Disable-Feature' (the legacy Server SKU feature name is ClientForNFS-Infrastructure), accepting that this removes the host's ability to mount NFS shares and may break NFS-dependent workloads until re-enabled - any re-enablement should be done only after patching. Additional value comes from reducing the prerequisite local foothold (restrict interactive/RDP logon rights to trusted administrators, remove unnecessary local administrator membership, and maintain EDR monitoring for local privilege-escalation behavior), noting that these reduce likelihood but do not remove the vulnerable code path. There is no confirmation of a published workaround that fully mitigates the flaw without applying the update; CISA SSVC notes automatable exploitation is 'no', so mass scanning/worm-style abuse is not expected.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is an integer overflow/wraparound (CWE-190) in the Windows implementation of the NFS client, the optional 'Client for NFS' feature (part of the Services for NFS component set) that lets Windows mount and access NFS shares. Because NFS client handling sits in the kernel/privileged path that parses client-side requests and data structures, an arithmetic overflow that wraps a size, count, or offset calculation can produce undersized allocations or out-of-bounds memory operations, which the CWE-190 root cause class commonly leads to and which the 'Buffer Overflow' tag associated with this CVE supports. Successful abuse from a local, low-privileged context yields code execution in a more privileged security context (integrity and confidentiality impact rated High, no scope change), consistent with the CVSS PR:L/AV:L rating. The affected code is present only where the NFS client feature has been installed, so the underlying technology dependency - not a default Windows service - is the key exposure factor. Per EUVD (EUVD-2026-99669), the vulnerable builds span Windows 10 (1607 through 22H2), Windows 11 (23H2 through 26H2), Windows Server 2012, 2012 R2, 2016, 2019, 2022 and 2025, including Server Core installations.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.8 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Local privilege escalation needs a low-privilege foothold (AV:L, PR:L), triggers reliably without user interaction (AC:L, UI:N), and yields full host compromise (C:H/I:H/A:H, scope unchanged).

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:19 cve.org
HIGH 7.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Integer overflow or wraparound in Windows Client for NFS allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A high-severity local privilege escalation vulnerability in Microsoft's optional Windows Client for NFS component lets an attacker who already has a foothold on a machine elevate to full administrative control of that host. Only systems where the Client for NFS feature has been installed are exposed, so the affected population is a definable subset of endpoints and servers rather than the whole estate, but a compromised host of that kind can lead to credential theft, lateral movement, and access to sensitive data. Leadership should treat this as a targeted remediation task - identify and patch the small number of systems running the component - not an enterprise-wide emergency.

Business Impact: Medium
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 74% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
Windows is ubiquitous but Client for NFS is an optional feature not installed by default
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +39
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Integer overflow occurs when an arithmetic operation produces a result that exceeds the maximum value a given integer type can store.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy