Skip to main content

Remote Desktop Gateway EUVDEUVD-2026-99448

| CVE-2026-84012 HIGH
Double Free (CWE-415)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-8r59-4g6g-hvpm
8.1
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach exposed RD Gateway endpoint
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted request sequence
  3. Exploit
    Win double-free race condition
  4. Execution
    Corrupt heap memory state
  5. Impact
    Execute arbitrary code on server

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Double free prevention
Exploitation Conditions

The Remote Desktop Gateway role service must be installed and network-reachable (typically TCP 443 for RD Gateway over HTTPS), and in practice it is often internet-exposed to broker RDP access, which is what makes AV:N/PR:N meaningful. Exploitation requires no authentication and no user interaction, but the limiting factor is the high attack complexity (AC:H): triggering a double free reliably generally depends on winning a race condition or achieving a precise memory/timing state, which Microsoft's SSVC reflects as Automatable:no. Systems without the RD Gateway role enabled are not affected; the exposure is therefore scoped to servers specifically deployed as Remote Desktop Gateways within the listed vulnerable build ranges.

Impact

This is a genuine high-priority vulnerability, though not a drop-everything emergency based on current signals. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N) describes a remotely reachable, pre-authentication (PR:N) code-execution flaw with total impact (C:H/I:H/A:H), consistent with the CWE-415 double free in a network-facing service. The key tempering factor is AC:H (high attack complexity), which for a double free almost always means a race condition or precise heap/memory state must be won reliably - this is why Microsoft's SSVC assessment rates it Automatable:no while still rating Technical Impact:total. The SSVC Exploitation status is 'none,' meaning no public or active exploitation is tracked, and the CVE is not in CISA KEV and shows no POC in the provided data - so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The signals are therefore internally consistent rather than conflicting: critical impact and remote unauthenticated reach, but offset by non-trivial exploitation difficulty and no evidence of exploitation yet. No EPSS score was supplied, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood could not be weighed. Net: patch promptly on internet-exposed RD Gateway hosts, but the AC:H barrier and absence of known exploitation argue against panic-grade urgency over other actively-exploited bugs.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A remote, unauthenticated attacker reaches an internet-facing Remote Desktop Gateway endpoint and sends a specially sequenced set of network requests designed to trigger a double free (CWE-415) in the RD Gateway service's memory handling. By winning the race/timing window implied by the high attack complexity, the attacker corrupts heap state to achieve arbitrary code execution in the service context. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, so successful exploitation would currently require independent development of a reliable trigger.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.7% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

A double-free memory corruption flaw in Microsoft's Remote Desktop Gateway (RD Gateway) role service allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute code with high confidentiality and integrity impact on affected Windows Server builds (2012 through 2025, including Server Core installations) and on Windows 10 1607 and 1809. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N) confirms the flaw is remotely reachable without credentials or user interaction, but exploitation is gated by high attack complexity: reliably triggering the double free generally requires winning a race condition or hitting a precise memory/timing state, which is why CISA's SSVC rates the issue as not automatable with no observed exploitation. There is no KEV listing and no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and a vendor patch is available, so this is a genuine high-priority issue for internet-facing RD Gateway hosts rather than a drop-everything emergency on current signals.

RemediationAI

Apply the Microsoft security update that resolves CVE-2026-84012 via the MSRC update guide (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-84012); patched builds are Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.26434, Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.23470, Server 2016 and Windows 10 1607 10.0.14393.9612, Server 2019 and Windows 10 1809 10.0.17763.9376, Server 2022 10.0.20348.5761, and Server 2025 10.0.26100.33650. Given the unauthenticated network attack path, prioritize patching any host with the RD Gateway role exposed to the internet. If immediate patching is not possible, remove the RD Gateway role on systems that do not strictly require it, or restrict inbound access to the RD Gateway HTTPS listener (typically TCP 443) to known client IP ranges via firewall or network ACLs - the trade-off is that this blocks legitimate external RDP brokering for roaming or unmanaged clients. As a supplementary measure, enable and review crash and memory-corruption telemetry (Windows Error Reporting, Defender for Endpoint) on RD Gateway hosts, and consider terminating the service if suspicious repeated restarts appear, since repeated double-free attempts will often manifest as process instability before successful exploitation.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 13 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability is a double free (CWE-415), a memory-safety defect in which the same allocated buffer is released twice, corrupting the allocator's internal bookkeeping and opening the door to controlled heap reuse and, ultimately, remote code execution. It resides in the Remote Desktop Gateway role service, the Windows component that brokers RDP connections over HTTPS (typically TCP 443) and performs authentication, authorization, and connection proxying for external clients. Because the service processes network-supplied input as an unauthenticated endpoint, the primitive is reachable pre-auth, which is what makes the PR:N/AV:N portion of the vector meaningful, but the AC:H rating reflects that turning a double free into reliable code execution is non-trivial - the attacker must engineer a favorable allocator and timing state, often via a race condition. The 'Authentication Bypass' tag is consistent with the fact that no credentials are required to reach the vulnerable path, and the affected CPE-derived build ranges confirm the exposure is scoped specifically to servers with the RD Gateway role installed rather than to every Windows host in those version families.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 8.1 HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.1 HIGH

Remote, unauthenticated, no user interaction (AV:N/PR:N/UI:N); AC:H because the double free requires winning a race/memory-state window; full impact within the service process so S:U and C/I/A:H.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:20 cve.org
HIGH 8.1

DescriptionCVE.org

Double free in Remote Desktop Gateway Service allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A memory corruption vulnerability in Microsoft's Remote Desktop Gateway role, the service many organizations publish to the internet to broker remote desktop sessions, could allow an unauthenticated attacker to run code on affected Windows Server and Windows 10 hosts with high confidentiality and integrity impact. Because RD Gateway is commonly internet-facing and requires no credentials or user interaction to reach, unpatched instances represent a direct external path into the environment, even though the high attack complexity and the absence of observed exploitation mean the risk is elevated rather than imminent. Leadership should care because a compromise of an RD Gateway host can hand an attacker an authenticated-looking foothold inside the corporate network, and the affected estate spans a decade of server builds that are rarely the first to be patched.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.7%
Top 49% exploitable
Prevalence
High
RD Gateway role ships with all supported Windows Server versions in enterprises
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Unlikely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.7%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

41
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +40
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0
CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

CVE-2026-96951 HIGH POC
8.8 Oct 13

Command injection in the Windows Shell lets remote, unauthenticated attackers bypass a Windows security feature and then

CVE-2025-24054 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Mar 11

External control of file name or path in Windows NTLM allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy