Skip to main content

Conductor OSS EUVDEUVD-2026-98480

| CVE-2026-109404 MEDIUM
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918)
2026-10-13 VulDB GHSA-fhq7-8m85-r6m9
5.5
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulDB
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach exposed Agent Runtime endpoint
  2. Exploit
    Submit request with attacker-controlled URL
  3. Execution
    Server performs forged internal request
  4. Impact
    Retrieve limited internal response data

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

The flaw resides in AgentController.java within the Agentspan Agent Runtime component of conductor-oss Conductor (versions up to and including 3.33.0-rc10). Per the CVSS vector (PR:N/UI:N/AC:L/AT:N), exploitation requires no authentication, no user interaction, and no special attack prerequisites - the attacker needs only network reachability to the Agent Runtime endpoint that processes the attacker-supplied URL. The primary LIMITING factor is exposure: impact is confined to limited confidentiality (VC:L, no integrity/availability effect), so realistic risk depends on whether the Conductor instance is internet-facing versus isolated, and on what internal services or metadata endpoints are reachable from the server. The exact feature/parameter that accepts the forged URL is not detailed in the description.

Impact

This is a moderate-risk, not a top-priority, issue. The vendor CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N) describes a remote, low-complexity, unauthenticated server-side request forgery, which raises baseline concern, but the impact metrics are narrow: only VC:L (limited confidentiality) with no integrity, availability, or subsequent-system impact, yielding a 6.9 (Medium) score. The vector carries E:P (Proof-of-Concept exploit maturity), indicating a demonstration-level exploit rather than confirmed active exploitation. No EPSS score was provided in the input, so real-world exploitation probability cannot be quantified. This CVE is NOT in CISA KEV, and no evidence of active exploitation exists. Signals are broadly consistent (network-reachable, no auth, limited impact), but note the single-source nature: all intelligence traces to VulDB only, with no vendor advisory, NVD enrichment, or independent confirmation, which lowers confidence in the affected-version range and the precise exploitability. Treat as a routine SSRF to patch during normal cycles, elevated only if the Conductor instance is internet-exposed and fronts sensitive internal metadata/services.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A remote, unauthenticated attacker sends a crafted request to the Agentspan Agent Runtime endpoint handled by AgentController.java, supplying an attacker-controlled URL that the server dereferences on its behalf. This SSRF can be used to reach internal-only services or read limited internal responses (consistent with VC:L). The CVSS 4.0 vector flags E:P, indicating a proof-of-concept exploit exists, though no weaponized or in-the-wild use is confirmed.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.5% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026

Server-side request forgery in conductor-oss Conductor through 3.33.0-rc10 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to induce the Agentspan Agent Runtime to make crafted requests to arbitrary URLs via AgentController.java (CWE-918). The assessed CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N) limits impact to confidentiality only, and the CVSS 4.0 vector's E:P metric indicates publicly available exploit code exists; no CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation was provided. Realistic risk is moderate and hinges on whether the Conductor instance is internet-facing and what internal services or cloud metadata endpoints are reachable from the server.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch was identified at time of analysis. Until a fixed release is available, apply compensating controls: (1) restrict network reachability to the Agentspan Agent Runtime endpoint (AgentController.java) so only trusted management networks can access it, using firewall ACLs, reverse-proxy access controls, or a service mesh policy - trade-off is reduced accessibility for legitimate clients; (2) enforce egress filtering or a forward proxy with destination allowlisting from Conductor servers to block requests to RFC1918 addresses, loopback, link-local ranges, and cloud metadata endpoints such as 169.254.169.254 - trade-off is potential breakage of legitimate outbound calls the agent runtime may make; (3) if the agent runtime feature is not required, disable the component or remove its endpoints until patched - trade-off is loss of functionality. Monitor server logs and network telemetry for anomalous outbound requests from Conductor hosts to internal or metadata destinations. Consult the VulDB advisory (https://vuldb.com/vuln/416946) for updates on a patched version.

Affected VersionsENISA

conductor 3.33.0-rc10

Affected Packages

euvd conductor no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The issue is a server-side request forgery (SSRF, CWE-918) in the Agentspan Agent Runtime component of conductor-oss Conductor, specifically in AgentController.java. SSRF occurs when an application accepts a user-supplied URL and fetches it without validating the destination, letting an attacker reach internal-only services, loopback interfaces, or cloud instance metadata endpoints from the server's network position. The affected product is conductor-oss Conductor (CPE cpe:2.3:a:conductor-oss:conductor:*), a Java-based workflow orchestration platform; the wildcard CPE indicates all versions are potentially affected, with the description constraining the affected range to 3.33.0-rc10 and earlier. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P) confirms no privileges (PR:N), no user interaction (UI:N), and no attack prerequisites (AT:N), meaning any network-reachable instance exposing the vulnerable endpoint can be targeted, while impact is limited to low confidentiality (VC:L). The exact feature or parameter that accepts the forged URL is not detailed in available intelligence.

Know when Conductor gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulDB) PRIMARY 5.5 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
vuln.today AI 5.3 MEDIUM

Remote unauthenticated SSRF (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N); limited confidentiality only (C:L) with no integrity/availability impact and no demonstrated scope change, matching the vendor's VC:L-only rating.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulDB).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulDB

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
Low
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
None
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

1
CVSS changed
Oct 13, 2026 - 13:22 NVD
6.9 (MEDIUM) 5.5 (MEDIUM)

DescriptionCVE.org

A vulnerability was identified in conductor-oss conductor up to 3.33.0-rc10. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file AgentController.java of the component Agentspan Agent Runtime. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.5%
Top 62% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
popular open-source workflow orchestration engine, moderate production footprint
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.5%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

28
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +28
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy