Skip to main content

Conductor CVE-2026-124507

| EUVDEUVD-2026-119768 MEDIUM
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918)
2026-11-09 VulDB GHSA-gq4w-px3f-vc47
5.5
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulDB
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach Conductor workflow API
  2. Exploit
    Submit task with attacker-controlled url
  3. Execution
    Server issues request via PLANNER_CONTEXT_FETCH (SSRF)
  4. Impact
    Read internal/metadata responses

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires that the target run a workflow using the PLANNER_CONTEXT_FETCH task and that the attacker can influence that task's 'url' argument (via workflow submission or workflow input reaching the Conductor API). The CVSS asserts no authentication (PR:N), which holds only if the Conductor API is network-reachable and, as in Conductor's default configuration, not fronted by authentication; if the deployment enforces auth or restricts who can define/submit workflows, that is the primary limiting factor. The impact is bounded (VC:L, no integrity or availability impact), so realistic outcomes are internal-service probing and limited disclosure rather than modification or outage. The GHSA fix status and any fixed version are not stated in the available sources.

Impact

This is a medium-severity SSRF (CWE-918) in conductor-oss Conductor, and the signals point to a moderate, not emergency, priority. The input CVSS 4.0 base vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N) with impact limited to VC:L and no integrity or availability impact yields a score of 5.5, consistent with an information-disclosure/internal-probing SSRF rather than code execution. Exploit maturity is flagged as E:P (Proof-of-Concept) and the description states the exploit was made public, but there is no CISA KEV listing and no EPSS score in the provided data, so there is no evidence of widespread active exploitation - EPSS probability is simply MISSING and cannot be cited either way. The vuln.today decision label is 'this_month' (not act_now/emergency), aligning with the modest CVSS and POC-but-not-KEV posture. One tension to verify: the CVSS asserts PR:N (unauthenticated), yet triggering the PLANNER_CONTEXT_FETCH handler requires an attacker to control the 'url' argument of a running workflow/task, which in many deployments means reaching Conductor's API - Conductor historically ships without authentication, so PR:N is defensible for an exposed instance but should be confirmed against the actual deployment. The sole reporter is VulDB; the referenced GHSA advisory (GHSA-cx7c-4mp7-rhcj) is claimed by the researcher but not independently confirmed as published in the provided data.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who can reach a Conductor instance's workflow API submits or triggers a PLANNER_CONTEXT_FETCH task whose 'url' argument points at an internal resource (e.g., a cloud metadata endpoint or an internal service). The Conductor server makes the outbound request on the attacker's behalf, returning or exposing responses from systems the attacker cannot reach directly. A public PoC reference is associated with the entry, so the trigger path is likely documented; the low attack complexity (AC:L) and network vector make the request itself trivial to craft.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Nov 09, 2026

Server-side request forgery in Conductor's PLANNER_CONTEXT_FETCH workflow task handler (PlannerContextFetchTask.java) affects versions up to 3.32.4, 3.33.0, 3.34.0-rc3 and 4.0.0-alpha.1 and lets remote attackers who can influence the task's url argument make the server fetch attacker-chosen destinations. The CVSS 4.0 score is 5.5 with PR:N, so unauthenticated exploitation is possible only where the Conductor API is reachable without authentication or workflow-definition controls; otherwise authentication and workflow-submission restrictions are the limiting factors. A public exploit reference has been disclosed and the researcher reports submitting a GHSA, but no CISA KEV entry or independently verified working exploit code is provided, and the priority signal is this_month rather than emergency.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch or fixed version is stated in the available sources; track the GHSA at https://github.com/conductor-oss/conductor/security/advisories/GHSA-cx7c-4mp7-rhcj and the VulDB entry https://vuldb.com/vuln/432811 for a fix. Until a fixed release is available, restrict access to the Conductor API and enforce authentication and authorization where it is reachable, since the assessed PR:N exposure depends on the API being unauthenticated. Also restrict who can define or submit workflows and who can influence the PLANNER_CONTEXT_FETCH task's url argument; if the task is not required, disable or avoid PLANNER_CONTEXT_FETCH workflows, accepting that workflows relying on it will break. These controls reduce exposure but do not replace a vendor fix.

Affected VersionsENISA

conductor 3.7
conductor 3.27
conductor 3.29
conductor 3.24
conductor 3.33.0
conductor 3.20
conductor 3.23
conductor 3.10
conductor 3.32.4
conductor 3.9
conductor 3.13
conductor 3.0
conductor 3.32.2
conductor 3.34.0-rc3
conductor 3.28
conductor 3.4
conductor 3.14
conductor 3.5
conductor 3.6
conductor 3.21
conductor 4.0.0-alpha.1
conductor 3.12
conductor 3.32
conductor 3.18
conductor 3.34.0-rc2
conductor 3.30
conductor 3.32.1
conductor 3.26
conductor 3.2
conductor 3.11
conductor 3.32.0
conductor 3.1
conductor 3.16
conductor 3.19
conductor 3.34.0-rc1
conductor 3.31
conductor 4.0.0-alpha.0
conductor 3.17
conductor 3.15
conductor 3.22
conductor 3.8
conductor 3.32.3
conductor 3.25
conductor 3.3

Affected Packages

euvd conductor no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The issue is CWE-918 SSRF in conductor-oss Conductor, a Java workflow orchestration platform. The affected component is the PLANNER_CONTEXT_FETCH task handler: WorkflowSystemTask.start in PlannerContextFetchTask.java uses the task's url argument without sufficient validation, so a workflow using that task can cause server-side requests to arbitrary destinations. CPE data identifies conductor-oss:conductor as the affected package across the listed versions. The assessed CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N) limits impact to low confidentiality disclosure, with no integrity or availability impact in the assessment. Exploitation requires that the target run a workflow using PLANNER_CONTEXT_FETCH and that the attacker can influence that task's url argument through workflow submission or workflow input reaching the Conductor API; the PR:N rating assumes a network-reachable API without enforced authentication, and deployments that require authentication or restrict who can define or submit workflows reduce exposure. Trigger details beyond manipulation of the url argument are not described in the available sources.

Know when Conductor gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulDB) PRIMARY 5.5 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
vuln.today AI 5.3 MEDIUM

Remote, low-complexity SSRF triggered via an attacker-controlled url on a typically unauthenticated Conductor API (PR:N), with limited disclosure (C:L) and no integrity or availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulDB).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulDB

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
Low
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
None
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

1
CVSS changed
Nov 09, 2026 - 01:22 NVD
6.9 (MEDIUM) 5.5 (MEDIUM)

DescriptionCVE.org

A vulnerability was found in conductor-oss conductor up to 3.32.4/3.33.0/3.34.0-rc3/4.0.0-alpha.1. This issue affects the function WorkflowSystemTask.start of the file PlannerContextFetchTask.java of the component PLANNER_CONTEXT_FETCH Task Handler. The manipulation of the argument url results in server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The researcher claims to have submitted a GHSA on the repository of the project.

Threat Intelligence Overview

Prevalence
Medium
workflow orchestration engine, moderate adoption in microservices backends
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS N/A
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
Yes
Human Impact· derived
Medium

Priority Score

28
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +28
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy