Skip to main content

Tuleap Enterprise Edition EUVDEUVD-2026-97326

| CVE-2026-105407 HIGH
OS Command Injection (CWE-78)
2026-10-12 3DS GHSA-27gp-5fgr-7v48
8.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: 3DS
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privilege Tuleap account
  2. Delivery
    Submit crafted input to vulnerable feature
  3. Exploit
    Inject OS command via unsanitized parameter
  4. Execution
    Execute arbitrary commands as service account
  5. Impact
    Compromise server data and integrity

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires an authenticated session on the target Tuleap Enterprise Edition instance: the CVSS vector specifies PR:L, meaning the attacker must hold at least a low-privilege account (e.g., a registered project or site user) before reaching the vulnerable command-handling code path. No user interaction is needed (UI:N) and the attack is deliverable over the network (AV:N) against versions 17.0 through 17.5. The limiting factors are therefore the need for valid credentials and exposure of the affected version - instances that restrict account registration, are not network-reachable by untrusted users, or run outside the 17.0-17.5 range are not exploitable. The description does not name the exact feature, configuration setting, or deployment mode involved, so the precise triggering component should be confirmed against the 3DS advisory.

Impact

The provided CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 8.8) describes a network-exploitable, low-complexity OS command injection requiring only low privileges (PR:L) and no user interaction, yielding full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact - consistent with arbitrary command execution on the server. However, the only corroborating signal beyond the vendor advisory is the CVSS score itself: no EPSS probability, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC are present in the input. There is therefore no evidence of active or widespread exploitation at this time; the high score reflects worst-case technical impact for an authenticated attacker, not demonstrated real-world weaponization. The requirement for a valid (if low-privileged) account materially narrows the attacker population versus an unauthenticated flaw, so this is best treated as a high-impact but access-gated issue: prioritize patching on internet-exposed or multi-tenant Tuleap instances where untrusted users can obtain accounts, while recognizing that the absence of EPSS/KEV/POC data means exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified from the inputs and should be re-checked against the 3DS advisory and NVD.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who holds or registers a low-privilege account on a Tuleap Enterprise Edition instance (17.0-17.5) submits crafted input to a vulnerable server-side feature that passes it unsanitized to an OS command, causing the server to execute attacker-controlled commands under the web application's service account. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, and no user interaction is required once the attacker is authenticated.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 1.8% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 12, 2026

OS command injection in Tuleap Enterprise Edition versions 17.0 through 17.5 allows an authenticated, low-privilege user to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying server, delivering a full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CVSS 3.1 base 8.8, AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). Because the assessed vector specifies PR:L, exploitation requires a valid account on the target instance - a registered project or site user is sufficient - and no user interaction is needed once that access is obtained, so unauthenticated attackers cannot trigger it directly. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis and the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV; no EPSS score was supplied in the source data. Practical risk is therefore concentrated on internet-reachable Tuleap Enterprise Edition instances in the 17.0-17.5 range that allow self-registration or broad account provisioning, since such deployments effectively lower the credential barrier to exploitation.

RemediationAI

The provided data contains no fixed version, patch reference, or commit, so patch status is unconfirmed and no exact remediation version should be assumed - the first action is to consult the vendor advisory at https://www.3ds.com/trust-center/security/security-advisories/cve-2026-105407 and the Tuleap release channel for the patched build covering the 17.0-17.5 range, then upgrade to that release. Until a fix is confirmed and deployed, apply compensating controls that directly address the PR:L prerequisite and the command-injection path: disable self-registration and tighten account provisioning so that only vetted users can obtain the low-privilege session the exploit requires (trade-off: slows onboarding and may break guest or public-project workflows); restrict network access to the Tuleap instance with a VPN, reverse proxy allow-list, or IP-based rules so that only trusted networks can reach it (trade-off: reduces accessibility for distributed or partner users); and review the privileges of the OS account running the Tuleap application and its scheduled jobs, removing unnecessary write access to system directories and shell-capable utilities so that command execution yields less (trade-off: may break legitimate integrations or build runners and requires testing). Additionally, deploy request-inspection/WAF rules targeting shell metacharacters on application endpoints, enable verbose application and process-audit logging on the Tuleap host to catch unexpected child processes, and rotate any secrets, database credentials, and API tokens reachable by the application account if compromise is suspected. Because the vulnerable feature is not identified in the source description, validating which endpoints to monitor or block depends on confirming the affected component from the vendor advisory rather than guessing.

Affected VersionsENISA

Tuleap Enterprise Edition 17.5-1 ≤17.5-31
Tuleap Enterprise Edition 17.0-1 ≤17.0-40

Affected Packages

euvd tuleap_enterprise_edition no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

This is a CWE-78 OS command injection: user-controllable input reaches a shell-invoking routine without adequate neutralization of shell metacharacters or argument boundaries, letting the attacker append or redirect commands that execute with the privileges of the Tuleap application process (typically the web/application service account). The CPE string provided - cpe:2.3:a:dassault_systèmes:tuleap_enterprise_edition:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* - is an umbrella entry with a wildcard version, so it does not narrow the range itself; the authoritative scoping comes from the affected statement of 17.0 through 17.5. Note the CPE vendor field is recorded as Dassault Systèmes, matching the 3DS trust-center advisory that serves as the source reference, rather than an independently enumerated upstream vendor. Tuleap is a collaborative application lifecycle management platform exposing web-facing project, tracker, and integration features, which is consistent with a network-delivered (AV:N) attack path against a server-side component; the specific vulnerable feature, configuration setting, or deployment mode is not named in the available description and should be confirmed against the 3DS advisory before building detections. From an impact standpoint, code execution as the application user is the pivot point: it exposes configuration secrets and database credentials, permits tampering with hosted repositories and artifacts (I:H), and can be escalated toward the host depending on service-account permissions.

Know when Tuleap Enterprise Edition gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (3DS) PRIMARY 8.8 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Network-reachable web app feature reachable by any low-privilege authenticated user (PR:L, AV:N, AC:L); OS command execution gives full C/I/A impact within the host's scope.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (3DS).

CVSS VectorVendor: 3DS

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

An OS Command Injection vulnerability affecting Tuleap Enterprise Edition from 17.0 through 17.5 could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the server.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Tuleap Enterprise Edition versions 17.0 through 17.5 contain an OS command injection flaw that lets any authenticated user with only basic, low-privilege access run arbitrary commands on the application server, giving an attacker full control over the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of that host. Because exploitation needs nothing more than a valid account and no user interaction, instances that permit self-registration or broad account provisioning - particularly those reachable from the internet - carry the greatest exposure, and a single compromised account could pivot into broader enterprise systems. Leadership should treat this as a priority remediation item for any team relying on an affected Tuleap deployment, since no vendor patch is currently available and defense depends entirely on access controls and network restrictions.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; interim mitigations are: restrict network exposure of affected Tuleap Enterprise Edition 17.0-17.5 instances to trusted networks or VPN, disable self-registration and anonymous/guest accounts, enforce least privilege and aggressively prune low-privilege accounts, segment and egress-filter the Tuleap hosts, apply WAF/reverse-proxy filtering for command-injection patterns, and enable enhanced logging, process monitoring, and file-integrity alerting to detect exploitation.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
1.8%
Top 22% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche open-source/enterprise ALM platform, limited production footprint
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 1.8%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
High

Priority Score

46
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +2
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy