Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privilege Tuleap account
-
DeliverySubmit crafted input to vulnerable feature
-
ExploitInject OS command via unsanitized parameter
-
ExecutionExecute arbitrary commands as service account
-
ImpactCompromise server data and integrity
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an authenticated session on the target Tuleap Enterprise Edition instance: the CVSS vector specifies PR:L, meaning the attacker must hold at least a low-privilege account (e.g., a registered project or site user) before reaching the vulnerable command-handling code path. No user interaction is needed (UI:N) and the attack is deliverable over the network (AV:N) against versions 17.0 through 17.5. The limiting factors are therefore the need for valid credentials and exposure of the affected version - instances that restrict account registration, are not network-reachable by untrusted users, or run outside the 17.0-17.5 range are not exploitable. The description does not name the exact feature, configuration setting, or deployment mode involved, so the precise triggering component should be confirmed against the 3DS advisory. |
| Impact | The provided CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 8.8) describes a network-exploitable, low-complexity OS command injection requiring only low privileges (PR:L) and no user interaction, yielding full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact - consistent with arbitrary command execution on the server. However, the only corroborating signal beyond the vendor advisory is the CVSS score itself: no EPSS probability, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC are present in the input. There is therefore no evidence of active or widespread exploitation at this time; the high score reflects worst-case technical impact for an authenticated attacker, not demonstrated real-world weaponization. The requirement for a valid (if low-privileged) account materially narrows the attacker population versus an unauthenticated flaw, so this is best treated as a high-impact but access-gated issue: prioritize patching on internet-exposed or multi-tenant Tuleap instances where untrusted users can obtain accounts, while recognizing that the absence of EPSS/KEV/POC data means exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified from the inputs and should be re-checked against the 3DS advisory and NVD. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who holds or registers a low-privilege account on a Tuleap Enterprise Edition instance (17.0-17.5) submits crafted input to a vulnerable server-side feature that passes it unsanitized to an OS command, causing the server to execute attacker-controlled commands under the web application's service account. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, and no user interaction is required once the attacker is authenticated. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 12, 2026
OS command injection in Tuleap Enterprise Edition versions 17.0 through 17.5 allows an authenticated, low-privilege user to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying server, delivering a full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CVSS 3.1 base 8.8, AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). Because the assessed vector specifies PR:L, exploitation requires a valid account on the target instance - a registered project or site user is sufficient - and no user interaction is needed once that access is obtained, so unauthenticated attackers cannot trigger it directly. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis and the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV; no EPSS score was supplied in the source data. Practical risk is therefore concentrated on internet-reachable Tuleap Enterprise Edition instances in the 17.0-17.5 range that allow self-registration or broad account provisioning, since such deployments effectively lower the credential barrier to exploitation.
RemediationAI
The provided data contains no fixed version, patch reference, or commit, so patch status is unconfirmed and no exact remediation version should be assumed - the first action is to consult the vendor advisory at https://www.3ds.com/trust-center/security/security-advisories/cve-2026-105407 and the Tuleap release channel for the patched build covering the 17.0-17.5 range, then upgrade to that release. Until a fix is confirmed and deployed, apply compensating controls that directly address the PR:L prerequisite and the command-injection path: disable self-registration and tighten account provisioning so that only vetted users can obtain the low-privilege session the exploit requires (trade-off: slows onboarding and may break guest or public-project workflows); restrict network access to the Tuleap instance with a VPN, reverse proxy allow-list, or IP-based rules so that only trusted networks can reach it (trade-off: reduces accessibility for distributed or partner users); and review the privileges of the OS account running the Tuleap application and its scheduled jobs, removing unnecessary write access to system directories and shell-capable utilities so that command execution yields less (trade-off: may break legitimate integrations or build runners and requires testing). Additionally, deploy request-inspection/WAF rules targeting shell metacharacters on application endpoints, enable verbose application and process-audit logging on the Tuleap host to catch unexpected child processes, and rotate any secrets, database credentials, and API tokens reachable by the application account if compromise is suspected. Because the vulnerable feature is not identified in the source description, validating which endpoints to monitor or block depends on confirming the affected component from the vendor advisory rather than guessing.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
This is a CWE-78 OS command injection: user-controllable input reaches a shell-invoking routine without adequate neutralization of shell metacharacters or argument boundaries, letting the attacker append or redirect commands that execute with the privileges of the Tuleap application process (typically the web/application service account). The CPE string provided - cpe:2.3:a:dassault_systèmes:tuleap_enterprise_edition:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* - is an umbrella entry with a wildcard version, so it does not narrow the range itself; the authoritative scoping comes from the affected statement of 17.0 through 17.5. Note the CPE vendor field is recorded as Dassault Systèmes, matching the 3DS trust-center advisory that serves as the source reference, rather than an independently enumerated upstream vendor. Tuleap is a collaborative application lifecycle management platform exposing web-facing project, tracker, and integration features, which is consistent with a network-delivered (AV:N) attack path against a server-side component; the specific vulnerable feature, configuration setting, or deployment mode is not named in the available description and should be confirmed against the 3DS advisory before building detections. From an impact standpoint, code execution as the application user is the pivot point: it exposes configuration secrets and database credentials, permits tampering with hosted repositories and artifacts (I:H), and can be escalated toward the host depending on service-account permissions.
Know when Tuleap Enterprise Edition gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Network-reachable web app feature reachable by any low-privilege authenticated user (PR:L, AV:N, AC:L); OS command execution gives full C/I/A impact within the host's scope.
Primary rating from Vendor (3DS).
CVSS VectorVendor: 3DS
DescriptionCVE.org
An OS Command Injection vulnerability affecting Tuleap Enterprise Edition from 17.0 through 17.5 could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the server.
Executive ViewAI
Tuleap Enterprise Edition versions 17.0 through 17.5 contain an OS command injection flaw that lets any authenticated user with only basic, low-privilege access run arbitrary commands on the application server, giving an attacker full control over the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of that host. Because exploitation needs nothing more than a valid account and no user interaction, instances that permit self-registration or broad account provisioning - particularly those reachable from the internet - carry the greatest exposure, and a single compromised account could pivot into broader enterprise systems. Leadership should treat this as a priority remediation item for any team relying on an affected Tuleap deployment, since no vendor patch is currently available and defense depends entirely on access controls and network restrictions.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; interim mitigations are: restrict network exposure of affected Tuleap Enterprise Edition 17.0-17.5 instances to trusted networks or VPN, disable self-registration and anonymous/guest accounts, enforce least privilege and aggressively prune low-privilege accounts, segment and egress-filter the Tuleap hosts, apply WAF/reverse-proxy filtering for command-injection patterns, and enable enhanced logging, process monitoring, and file-integrity alerting to detect exploitation.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.
More in Tuleap Enterprise Edition
View allOS command injection in Dassault Systèmes Tuleap Enterprise Edition versions 17.3 through 17.5 allows an authenticated r
Stored cross-site scripting in Tuleap Enterprise Edition 17.0 through 17.5 allows an attacker holding a low-privileged a
Stored cross-site scripting in Tuleap Enterprise Edition 17.0 through 17.5 allows an authenticated user with only low pr
Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) in Tuleap Enterprise Edition 17.0 through 17.5 allows an authenticated attacker to inj
Authorization bypass in Tuleap Enterprise Edition 17.0 through 17.5 allows an authenticated attacker who already holds t
The XML import feature in Tuleap Enterprise Edition versions 17.0 through 17.5 assigns default passwords to user account
Insecure direct object reference (IDOR) in Dassault Systèmes Tuleap Enterprise Edition 17.0 through 17.5 lets attackers
SQL injection in Tuleap Enterprise Edition 17.5 allows an authenticated attacker with only low-level privileges to injec
EUVD-2026-97326
GHSA-27gp-5fgr-7v48
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Exploit-DB