Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessCraft malicious input payload
-
ExploitInduce ClearPass client user to process input
-
ExecutionTrigger command injection during parsing
-
ImpactExecute arbitrary commands with elevated privileges
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Command injection prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires that a user or operator of the ClearPass Policy Manager CLIENT software process attacker-crafted input (CVSS UI:R) - the server/appliance is not directly hit by an unsolicited remote request; the attacker must get malicious input into the client's processing path (e.g., a malicious server/service the client communicates with, or a crafted file/parameter the client ingests). The principal limiting factor is this required user interaction. The upside for attackers is that no authentication is claimed (PR:N) and complexity is low (AC:L). The flaw's impact (arbitrary command execution with elevated privileges) implies the client component runs with elevated/service-level privileges on the host - verify this default against the HPE advisory, as it directly affects realistic severity. |
| Impact | This is a credible high-priority issue but with meaningful caveats. The input CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 8.8) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated command-injection flaw yielding full CIA impact with elevated privileges - a strong technical-severity signal. However, the UI:R metric is a critical limiter: the description states exploitation requires an attacker 'able to supply crafted input' to the ClearPass client software, meaning a user/operator of the client must process attacker-controlled input rather than the server being hit directly by a remote packet. There is a latent tension to verify: PR:N claims no privileges, yet the vulnerability is in client software and yields 'elevated privileges' on the host - confirm with HPE whether the client runs with elevated/service privileges by default. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC were provided, so exploitation is currently theoretical. Exploitation status: no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Net: treat as a serious patch priority for ClearPass operators due to high technical impact and low complexity, but the required user interaction and absence of exploitation signals (EPSS/KEV/POC) argue against emergency same-day response relative to a true zero-UI remote RCE. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker crafts malicious input and induces a user or operator of the ClearPass Policy Manager client software to process it (for example via a malicious server response, file, or configuration value the client ingests). When the client parses the crafted input, it fails to sanitize it and passes it to a shell/command context, executing attacker-supplied commands with elevated privileges on the host. No public exploit code has been identified at the time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 06, 2026
Command injection in the client software component of HPE Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager allows an attacker to execute arbitrary commands with elevated privileges on an affected host, provided they can get crafted input into the client's processing path. The flaw is rated 8.8 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H): it is network-reachable, low complexity, and requires no authentication, but exploitation depends on a user or operator of the client interacting with attacker-supplied input (UI:R), which is the principal limiting factor - the appliance/server is not compromised by an unsolicited remote request alone. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and the issue is not in CISA KEV; no EPSS score was provided in the source data, so exploitation likelihood should be judged primarily on the user-interaction prerequisite and the elevated-privilege impact if triggered.
RemediationAI
Apply the fix specified in the HPE security bulletin for this issue (https://support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/docDisplay?docId=hpesbnw05158en_us&docLocale=en_US) - patch availability status is not confirmed from the provided input data, so the advisory must be checked for the exact fixed version applicable to the ClearPass client build in use. Until the client is updated, reduce exposure by treating every input source the client consumes as untrusted: restrict the set of ClearPass servers, RADIUS/endpoint sources and update endpoints the client is permitted to contact via host firewall and network segmentation so a rogue or compromised peer cannot feed crafted responses into the client's processing path, and do not open untrusted files or parameters with the client. Where operationally possible, run the client with the least privileges feasible instead of elevated/service-level rights - this may break functionality that legitimately requires elevated access, so validate in a test environment - and enable endpoint detection/command-line logging on hosts running the client to catch injected process execution. Because exploitation requires user interaction, reinforce operator awareness to avoid processing unexpected content through the client, and monitor HPE's advisory page for updated version and workaround guidance.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The vulnerability is a command injection flaw (tagged 'Command Injection' in the source feed; no CWE identifier was supplied, though the class corresponds to OS command injection, CWE-78) in the client-side software of ClearPass Policy Manager, HPE Aruba's network access control (NAC) platform used for 802.1X, RADIUS, TACACS+ and device profiling. Because the injection occurs in a client component rather than the server/appliance, the attack path is indirect: the attacker must either operate or compromise a server, service, or data source the client communicates with, or otherwise cause the client to ingest a crafted file, parameter, or response, and then induce a user or operator to process it. The CVSS vector (PR:N, UI:R, S:U) confirms that no credentials are required by the attacker but that a human in the loop is required for the payload to reach the vulnerable sink. The High confidentiality, integrity and availability ratings, combined with the fact that the injected commands execute 'with elevated privileges' on the affected host, indicate the client process runs with high or service-level rights - meaning a successful injection typically yields full control of the endpoint on which the client is installed, not just the ClearPass data it handles. No CPE strings were included in the provided intelligence, so exact affected build/platform combinations must be taken from the HPE security bulletin rather than assumed.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Network-delivered crafted input (AV:N) with no auth (PR:N) but mandatory victim processing (UI:R); command injection yields full code execution, so C/I/A:H and S:U within the client host.
Primary rating from Vendor (hpe).
CVSS VectorVendor: hpe
DescriptionCVE.org
A command injection vulnerability exists in the client software of ClearPass Policy Manager. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker who is able to supply crafted input to the affected software to execute arbitrary commands with elevated privileges on the affected host.
Executive ViewAI
A high-severity command injection flaw in the client software component of HPE Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager could allow an attacker to run arbitrary commands with elevated privileges on affected hosts, placing network access control infrastructure and the endpoints that depend on it at risk. Successful exploitation requires a user or operator to interact with attacker-supplied input, which reduces the likelihood of silent, automated compromise but does not eliminate it in environments where administrators routinely open untrusted content. Because ClearPass governs authentication and authorization decisions across the enterprise, leadership should treat a compromised client as a potential pivot point into broader identity and network trust.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: enforce user awareness that the flaw requires interaction with attacker-supplied input, restrict network exposure of client-facing services, apply least-privilege configuration on client hosts, monitor for unexpected command or child-process execution by the ClearPass client, and apply vendor-supplied hardening guidance until a patch is published.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.
EUVD-2026-93889
GHSA-49cr-m39h-fpjw
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB