Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privileged cluster access
-
DeliveryCraft malicious ContainerStorageModule CR
-
ExploitTrigger flawed reconciler privilege handling
-
ExecutionOperator deploys over-privileged workload
-
PersistGain root on cluster node
-
ImpactCompromise cluster / escalate laterally
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Least privilege enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires (1) a running deployment of Dell Container Storage Modules (CSM) Operator at a version prior to 1.18.0, and (2) an attacker holding low-privileged access within the Kubernetes cluster sufficient to create or modify the ContainerStorageModule Custom Resource that the vulnerable reconciler processes (PR:L). No user interaction is needed (UI:N). The principal LIMITING factor is the authentication/RBAC prerequisite: a fully anonymous external attacker cannot trigger this without first obtaining a low-privileged cluster credential or namespace foothold, so clusters that tightly restrict who can submit/alter the CSM Custom Resource materially reduce exposure. The payoff - root on cluster nodes via a scope change (S:C) - makes multi-tenant clusters the highest-risk deployments. |
| Impact | Vendor-assigned CVSS 3.1 is 9.9 (Critical) with vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H, indicating a network-reachable, low-complexity flaw that requires only low privileges, needs no user interaction, and crosses a security scope boundary to deliver total confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. The scope change (S:C) combined with the description's claim of root-level access on cluster nodes is the key driver of the near-maximal score: a constrained low-privilege actor escalates to full node compromise. However, several real-world risk signals are MISSING from the input and must not be assumed: no EPSS exploitation-probability score was provided, the CVE is NOT listed in CISA KEV, and no public proof-of-concept is referenced - so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The PR:L metric confirms this is NOT an unauthenticated internet-wide threat; the attacker must already hold some low-privileged foothold within the Kubernetes cluster (e.g., a namespace tenant or a limited service account) able to interact with the ContainerStorageModule Custom Resource. Net assessment: this is a genuinely high-priority flaw for the specific population running Dell CSM Operator, because privilege escalation to node root collapses tenant isolation - but the absence of KEV/POC/EPSS data means there is no evidence of active or imminent widespread exploitation, so it reads as a high-severity-but-prerequisite-gated issue rather than a confirmed in-the-wild emergency. Prioritize patching where Dell CSM is deployed on multi-tenant clusters; verify the authentication prerequisite against your own RBAC before treating it as fully remote. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A low-privileged tenant or compromised service account within a Kubernetes cluster running Dell CSM Operator (prior to 1.18.0) crafts or modifies a ContainerStorageModule Custom Resource whose reconciler mishandles privilege boundaries. The malicious CR causes the operator to provision or run workloads with excessive privileges, yielding root-level code execution on the underlying cluster nodes and breaking tenant isolation. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, and exploitation requires an existing authenticated foothold (PR:L) rather than anonymous network access. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 06, 2026
Privilege escalation in Dell Container Storage Modules (CSM) Operator versions prior to 1.18.0 allows an authenticated, low-privileged attacker who can create or modify the ContainerStorageModule Custom Resource to obtain root-level access on Kubernetes cluster nodes. The flaw is an improper privilege management weakness (CWE-269) in the ContainerStorageModule Custom Resource reconciler, rated CVSS 3.1 9.9 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H) because the impact crosses a security scope boundary and delivers total confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact against the underlying nodes. Exploitation is not unrestricted: it requires a low-privileged cluster credential with rights to submit or alter the CSM Custom Resource (PR:L, no user interaction), so multi-tenant clusters that grant this permission broadly are the highest-risk deployments. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and no CISA KEV entry exists; EPSS data was not provided.
RemediationAI
Upgrade Dell Container Storage Modules (CSM) Operator to version 1.18.0 or later; Dell released the fix in security advisory DSA-2026-448 (https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000515771/dsa-2026-448-security-update-for-dell-container-storage-modules-multiple-vulnerabilities?msockid=3021cac2195069ed3194ddad186a68f9), and that advisory should be treated as the authoritative source for the current patched build and any module-specific minimum versions. Where an immediate upgrade is not possible, the highest-value compensating control is RBAC tightening: remove create/update/patch/delete rights on the containerstoragemodules custom resource from all non-administrative roles, ServiceAccounts, and CI/GitOps identities, granting it only to a small, audited set of cluster administrators - the trade-off is that automated GitOps pipelines that legitimately manage CSM configuration will break until they are re-credentialed with the privileged identity. Second, deploy admission policy (OPA Gatekeeper, Kyverno, or a ValidatingAdmissionPolicy) to block non-allowlisted pods that request privileged mode, hostPID/hostNetwork, or hostPath mounts of sensitive paths such as /, /var/lib/kubelet, or /dev; this must be scoped with an allowlist for the CSM/CSI namespaces and DaemonSets, otherwise storage node plugins will stop scheduling and volumes will fail to mount. Third, hunt for prior abuse by auditing ContainerStorageModule objects and their change history, reviewing the operator's managed workloads for unexpected privileged containers or host mounts, and checking node-level indicators of compromise on cluster hosts; rotate any cluster-admin or node-level credentials that may have been reachable from a compromised node. Finally, monitor the Dell advisory for additional modules referenced in the same DSA-2026-448 bulletin, since it covers multiple vulnerabilities beyond this one.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Dell Container Storage Modules (CSM) is a Kubernetes storage enablement suite whose operator follows the standard controller/reconciler pattern: it watches a custom resource definition (CRD), here ContainerStorageModule, and drives the cluster toward the declared state by creating and managing supporting workloads such as CSI driver controllers and per-node plugin DaemonSets. Those workloads legitimately require elevated privileges - privileged containers, hostPath mounts, host PID/network namespaces - because they must manage storage devices on each node. The vulnerability is an instance of CWE-269 (Improper Privilege Management): the reconciler does not adequately constrain or validate the trust level of the input it acts upon, so a principal holding only low-privileged cluster access can influence the operator into deploying or reconfiguring components that carry node-level privilege. The CVSS scope change (S:C) reflects that the attacker starts inside the cluster control-plane/namespace authorization domain but the resulting impact lands on the node host operating system, which is a distinct security authority; high C/I/A scores reflect root on the node. Because the CPE string cpe:2.3:a:dell:container_storage_modules_(csm):*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* uses version wildcards, all releases before 1.18.0 should be treated as affected unless the vendor advisory states otherwise.
Know when Kubernetes gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Low-privileged cluster user reaches the reconciler over the API (AV:N, PR:L, AC:L); escalation from the operator component to node root is a scope change (S:C) with total C/I/A impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (dell).
CVSS VectorVendor: dell
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Dell Container Storage Modules (CSM) Operator, versions prior to 1.18.0 contains an Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in the ContainerStorageModule Custom Resource reconciler. A low privileged remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to escalation of privileges and gaining root-level access on cluster nodes.
Articles & Coverage 1
Executive ViewAI
Dell Container Storage Modules (CSM) Operator versions prior to 1.18.0 contain a critical privilege escalation flaw that allows any cluster identity holding rights to create or alter the ContainerStorageModule custom resource to obtain root-level control over Kubernetes cluster nodes. Organizations running multi-tenant or shared Kubernetes clusters - where that permission is often granted broadly - face full compromise of node confidentiality, integrity, and availability, exposing hosted tenant workloads and platform uptime. With no vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis, leadership should treat this as a priority access-control and platform-hardening issue rather than a routine upgrade.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: restrict and continuously audit RBAC so that only a minimal set of platform administrators can create or modify the ContainerStorageModule custom resource; apply admission-control policies (OPA Gatekeeper, Kyverno) to deny non-admin writes to that custom resource; enable audit logging and alerting on all ContainerStorageModule create/update/delete events as high-severity security incidents; isolate or temporarily remove the Dell CSM Operator from multi-tenant clusters where the permission cannot be tightly constrained; monitor Dell advisories for the fixed release and upgrade promptly once available.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
More in Kubernetes
View allA critical vulnerability in Kubernetes ingress-nginx controller allows unauthenticated attackers with pod network access
Credential-harvesting malware compromised 84 versions of 42 TanStack npm packages on 2026-05-11 via chained GitHub Actio
Kubernetes ingress-nginx contains a configuration injection vulnerability via the mirror-target and mirror-host Ingress
A security issue was discovered in ingress-nginx https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress-nginx where the `auth-url` Ingres
A security issue was discovered in ingress-nginx https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress-nginx where the `auth-tls-match-c
Kubernetes API server in all versions allow an attacker who is able to create a ClusterIP service and set the spec.exter
A security issue was discovered in Kubernetes where a user that can create pods on Windows nodes may be able to escalate
Argo CD is a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.9), this vulne
Unauthenticated remote attackers can trigger complete database overwrites, server-side file reads, and SSRF attacks agai
The Kubernetes integration in GitLab Enterprise Edition 11.x before 11.2.8, 11.3.x before 11.3.9, and 11.4.x before 11.4
Fluentd configuration injection in the kube-logging Logging operator before 6.6.0 allows a namespace-scoped user who can
Kyverno Kubernetes policy engine prior to 1.x has a privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 9.9) allowing policy bypass
EUVD-2026-93432
GHSA-fwc4-f52f-hjhh
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB