Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as read-only global admin
-
ExploitQuery build trigger API
-
ExecutionExtract exposed delegate write tokens
-
ImpactPush arbitrary images to private repo
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization logic validation
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an account with global read-only administrative privileges on the Quay registry (PR:H) and that the target repositories use build triggers whose configuration contains repository write/delegate tokens - the flaw is the build trigger API returning those delegate tokens to read-only admins. Limiting factors: the attacker must already hold a global read-only admin role (not an ordinary or anonymous user), build triggers must be configured on repositories of interest, and no user interaction is needed. This confines realistic exploitation to malicious insiders or attackers who have already compromised a read-only admin credential rather than unauthenticated external attackers. |
| Impact | This is a moderate-severity authorization flaw (CWE-863) with a vendor-assigned CVSS of 5.5 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N). The vector shows network reach and low complexity, but critically requires high privileges (PR:H): the attacker must already be a global read-only administrative user, which substantially narrows the realistic attacker population to insiders or compromised admin accounts rather than anonymous internet attackers. There is no CISA KEV listing and no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and no EPSS probability was provided in the input, so there is no evidence of active or widespread exploitation. The signals are internally consistent - a high-privilege, insider-leaning integrity issue rather than a mass-exploitable remote flaw - so this should be treated as a meaningful but not emergency priority, prioritized where Quay hosts sensitive private repositories and where read-only admin accounts are broadly delegated. Note that the description frames the account as 'read-only,' yet the CVSS integrity impact is High (I:H) because the leaked delegate tokens permit image pushes; this apparent tension is resolved by recognizing the privilege escalation is the core impact and should be verified against Red Hat's advisory. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An authenticated user holding only global read-only administrative privileges on a Quay instance queries the build trigger API endpoint and receives trigger configuration data that improperly includes repository write (delegate) tokens. Using those leaked tokens, the user pushes a tampered or malicious container image into a private repository they should not be able to modify. No public proof-of-concept is known, but the low attack complexity (AC:L) means the request sequence is straightforward once read-only admin access is held. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 05, 2026
Read-only administrative users on Red Hat Quay can retrieve repository write (delegate) tokens through the build trigger API, then use those tokens to push arbitrary container images into private repositories despite their restricted role. Exploitation requires an account already holding global read-only administrative privileges (CVSS vector PR:H) plus repositories that have build triggers configured with embedded delegate tokens, so realistic risk is confined to malicious insiders or attackers who have already compromised a read-only admin credential. The flaw is rated moderate at CVSS 5.5 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N), and no public exploit identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch version was identified in the provided data at time of analysis; confirm fixed builds and official guidance via the Red Hat advisory at https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-105447 and Bugzilla bug 2545916. Compensating controls: rotate every delegate token associated with build triggers (invalidating any tokens already harvested, at the cost of build breakage until triggers are re-created), delete or disable build triggers on sensitive private repositories so the tokens are not retrievable at all, and strictly minimize and audit assignments of the global read-only administrative role to untrusted principals since that role is the prerequisite for exploitation. Enable Quay audit logging on the build trigger API and monitor for anomalous token use or image pushes to detect abuse during the window before a fix is deployed.
Affected ProductsAI
The affected product is Red Hat Quay (Quay container registry), specifically deployments in which build triggers with embedded repository write/delegate tokens are configured. No CPE identifiers or explicit version ranges were supplied in the available intelligence; version scope should be confirmed against the Red Hat advisory at https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-105447 and the associated Red Hat Bugzilla entry at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2545916. Any Quay instance granting global read-only administrative roles to users who are not fully trusted, and running repositories with build triggers, is potentially exposed.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Quay is a container image registry whose repository build triggers (for example, webhook-driven builds from source-control providers) store configuration that includes delegate tokens - credentials permitting image pushes to the associated repository. Red Hat Quay exposes build trigger data through its API, and CVE-2026-105447 is a CWE-863 (Incorrect Authorization) flaw: the API fails to scope the response to the requester's privilege level, returning trigger configuration including those write-capable delegate tokens to users holding only a global read-only administrative role. The correct behavior would be to filter or redact credential material for principals without write authorization; instead, a read-only admin can query the build trigger endpoint, harvest the tokens, and authenticate to the registry as a writer, escalating from read-only to write and defeating the registry's authorization boundary.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Requires an existing global read-only admin account so PR:H; token disclosure gives C:L while token-enabled image pushes to private repos give I:H, with no availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (redhat).
CVSS VectorVendor: redhat
DescriptionCVE.org
A flaw was found in Quay. When handling build trigger requests, the application incorrectly exposes trigger configuration details containing repository write tokens to global read-only administrative users. An authenticated user with read-only privileges can exploit this flaw by querying the build trigger API to retrieve these delegate tokens. This issue allows a restricted user to bypass read-only limitations and push arbitrary container images to private repositories, leading to privilege escalation.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
EUVD-2026-92793
GHSA-wr22-68gv-32xw
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB