Skip to main content

MiVoice Office 400 EUVDEUVD-2026-92292

| CVE-2026-104805 HIGH
Path Traversal (CWE-22)
2026-10-05 NCSC.ch GHSA-vh23-h9qx-6q3f
8.5
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: NCSC.ch
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain access to backup SFTP repository
  2. Delivery
    Craft malicious TGZ with traversal paths
  3. Exploit
    System restores unverified archive
  4. Execution
    Write attacker files to OS paths
  5. Impact
    Execute code as root on VM

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V5 - File Handling Path canonicalization, traversal prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Discovery, Collection

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already have write access to the configured backup repository (SFTP or other configured target) and the system to subsequently perform a restore of the attacker-supplied TGZ archive. The specific enabling weakness is that the restore mechanism performs no path validation, file-type checking, integrity checking, or file-signature verification before extraction, allowing traversal entries to escape the intended directory. The absence of an enforced backup password lowers the barrier to obtaining repository access. Limiting factors: this is NOT remote-unauthenticated against a default config - it requires privileged access to the backup repository (reflected as PR:H) and a restore operation to be triggered, which constrains exploitation to insiders or attackers who have already compromised the backup storage path.

Impact

This is a genuine high-severity issue but not an indiscriminate internet-facing threat. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N) with full vulnerable- and subsequent-system impact (VC/VI/VA:H, SC/SI/SA:H) and score 8.5 reflects a path-traversal flaw (CWE-22) in the backup restore routine that can yield root-level compromise of the underlying VM. The critical tempering signal is PR:H: exploitation requires privileged access to the configured backup repository (SFTP or equivalent), so this is an authenticated/privileged-access attack, not remote-unauthenticated. CVSS exploit maturity is E:P (Proof-of-Concept), indicating a PoC-level technique rather than confirmed mass exploitation. No EPSS score was provided, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified. No CISA KEV listing is present, so there is no evidence of active in-the-wild exploitation. Net: prioritize patching for Mitel MiVoice Office 400 operators because the impact is full root RCE, but the required privileged repository access substantially narrows the realistic attacker population, making this a targeted/insider-leaning risk rather than a wormable mass-exploitation threat.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has obtained access to the configured backup repository (e.g., the SFTP target), aided by the absence of an enforced backup password, places a specially crafted TGZ archive containing path-traversal entries and attacker-controlled files. When the MiVoice Office 400 system restores this backup, it extracts the files without validating paths, file types, or signatures, writing attacker files to sensitive OS locations and potentially achieving arbitrary code execution as root. CVSS exploit maturity E:P indicates a proof-of-concept technique exists; attack complexity is low once repository access is held.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 05, 2026

Arbitrary file write in Mitel MiVoice Office 400 backup restoration can lead to root-level code execution if an attacker can supply a malicious TGZ archive to the configured backup repository; however, exploitation requires privileged access to the backup repository and a restore operation, making it a high-severity issue but not an indiscriminate internet-facing threat. No public exploit identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. To reduce risk, enforce strong, unique passwords for backup repositories and use SFTP with key-based authentication instead of password authentication. Restrict network access to the backup repository to only authorized hosts. If the backup restoration feature is not essential, disable it. Additionally, validate the integrity and authenticity of backup archives before restoration using out-of-band checksums or digital signatures. Monitor backup repositories for unauthorized changes. Apply vendor patch when released. Refer to the DigitalCanion advisory at https://digitalcanion.com/en/security-research/#vendor=mitel&status=cna for updates. Note that disabling backup restoration may impact disaster recovery capabilities, and restricting repository access may affect backup operations.

Affected VersionsENISA

Mitel MiVoice Office 400 11.0.96.0

Affected Packages

euvd mitel_mivoice_office_400 no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability resides in the backup restoration functionality of Mitel MiVoice Office 400, which processes TGZ archives. The mechanism fails to validate paths (CWE-22 path traversal), file types, integrity, and authenticity before extraction. This allows a malicious archive to contain traversal sequences that write files outside the intended directory, potentially overwriting system files or placing malicious scripts. Since the restoration process likely runs with elevated privileges (root), this can lead to arbitrary code execution and compromise of the underlying Linux VM. The CVSS v4.0 vector provided is CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H, and our independent assessment using CVSS v3.1 is AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H, both confirming that the attacker must have high privileges (access to the backup repository) to exploit.

Know when Mitel Mivoice Office 400 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (NCSC.ch) PRIMARY 8.5 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/AU:Y/R:U/V:D/RE:M/U:Amber
vuln.today AI 9.1 CRITICAL

Requires privileged access to the configured backup repository (PR:H); unverified archive extraction writes to the host OS, crossing a trust boundary (S:C) for full root compromise (C/I/A:H).

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Primary rating from Vendor (NCSC.ch).

CVSS VectorVendor: NCSC.ch

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
High
Subsequent system: Integrity
High
Subsequent system: Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

DigitalCanion has discovered a vulnerability in the backup restoration functionality that allows an attacker with access to the configured backup repository to introduce arbitrary files into the system during restoration.

The specific flaw exists within the backup restoration mechanism, which fails to properly validate the paths, file types, integrity, and authenticity of files contained within a restored TGZ archive. The application does not perform file-signature verification before extracting the archive, allowing a specially crafted backup to contain attacker-controlled files.

An attacker with access to the backup SFTP or other configured repository can therefore provide a malicious TGZ archive that, when restored by the system, may place arbitrary files on the underlying Linux system. Depending on the location and permissions of the extracted files, this behavior can potentially be leveraged to achieve arbitrary code execution with root privileges and compromise the underlying virtual machine.

The absence of enforced backup passwords further reduces the protection provided by the backup mechanism and may facilitate unauthorized access to the repository.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A high-severity arbitrary file write vulnerability in the Mitel MiVoice Office 400 backup and restore capability could let an attacker with access to the platform's backup repository achieve root-level code execution when a restore is performed, putting a system that many organizations depend on for business telephony and unified communications at risk of full compromise or outage. Exploitation is not casual or internet-wide: it requires privileged access to the backup repository plus a restore operation, so the realistic threat is an insider, a compromised administrative account, or an attacker who has already established a foothold in the management environment. Because no vendor-released patch is currently available, this is primarily a governance, access-control, and monitoring exposure that leadership should track until Mitel ships a fix.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; interim mitigations are to restrict and isolate the backup repository from untrusted networks, enforce least-privilege and MFA-protected administrative access, disable or gated-approval the restore function outside maintenance windows, verify backup archive integrity by checksum before restore, and enable logging, file integrity monitoring, and alerting on repository writes and restore events.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 89% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
widely deployed Mitel SMB/enterprise PBX appliance, not ubiquitous infrastructure
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

42
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +42
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

Path traversal exploits occur when applications use user-controlled input to construct file system paths without proper validation.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy