Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain local low-privileged account
-
ExploitInvoke NVIDIA kernel-mode driver interface
-
ExecutionTrigger improper access control (CWE-862)
-
ImpactCrash or hang GPU driver/host (DoS)
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization checks on every request
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires local access with a low-privileged account on a system running the affected NVIDIA GPU Display Driver (GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS, or Tesla) on Windows or Linux, or the affected Guest Driver/Virtual GPU Manager in a vGPU deployment; the attacker invokes the kernel-mode driver interface directly. Exploitation is LIMITED by the need for pre-existing local authenticated access (PR:L, AV:L - not remotely reachable) and by driver version: only versions prior to the fixed releases (e.g., GeForce < 580.178.04/616.56, RTX/Quadro/NVS < 610.88/615.71.09, vGPU <= 20.1) are affected, and for one GeForce branch only Maxwell, Volta, and Pascal architectures. Impact is capped at denial of service - no code execution, privilege escalation, or data disclosure is possible. |
| Impact | This is a genuinely low-to-moderate priority issue despite the 5.5 (Medium) CVSS. The vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H is internally consistent with the description: an already-authenticated local low-privileged user triggers a kernel-mode improper access control flaw (CWE-862) whose only impact is denial of service (A:H, with C:N and I:N confirming no data exposure or integrity loss). There is no EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis, so there is no evidence of active exploitation or automated weaponization. The realistic worst case is a local user crashing/hanging the GPU driver or host - a stability/availability nuisance rather than a privilege-escalation or RCE threat. No signals conflict here: the CVSS local vector matches the 'kernel mode layer' local-trigger description and the DoS-only impact. The one caveat worth verifying with the vendor is the 'Authentication Bypass' tag, which overstates the outcome - CWE-862 is a missing-authorization (authz) weakness and the confirmed impact is DoS, not an authentication bypass. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A local user with an unprivileged account on a Windows or Linux workstation or vGPU-backed VM issues a crafted request to the NVIDIA kernel-mode driver that the driver fails to properly authorize, causing the driver or host to crash or hang. No public proof-of-concept exists; exploitation yields only denial of service, not code execution or data access. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 30, 2026
Denial of service in the NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Windows and Linux arises from improper access control (CWE-862) in the kernel-mode layer, where a local user with a low-privileged account can invoke a driver interface they should not be authorized to reach and thereby crash or hang the affected system. Impact is limited to availability: with the assessed vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H (base 5.5, Medium), exploitation requires pre-existing local authenticated access on a host running an affected driver branch - GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS, Tesla, or the vGPU Guest Driver/Virtual GPU Manager - and no remote path exists. No public exploit code has been identified and there is no confirmed active exploitation (no CISA KEV listing), and no code execution, privilege escalation, or data disclosure is achievable, making this a low-to-moderate operational priority that is chiefly relevant to multi-user, VDI, and shared-workstation environments.
RemediationAI
Apply the vendor-released patch by upgrading to the fixed driver build for your branch as published by NVIDIA in its product-security advisory (https://github.com/NVIDIA/product-security/tree/main/2026/5861): GeForce users should move to 580.178.04 or later (or the applicable fixed release for their branch, such as 616.56), RTX/Quadro/NVS users to 610.88 or later (or 615.71.09 and later branch fixes), and Tesla users to 610.57.04 or later, noting that on the branch where only Maxwell, Volta, and Pascal architectures are impacted the fixed release is 582.78. For vGPU deployments, update both components - the Virtual GPU Manager (e.g., 596.38, superseding affected vGPU 19.5 and 20.1 builds) and the Guest Driver (e.g., 596.36) - and keep guest and host versions aligned, since mismatched pairs can leave the guest-side interface exposed. Until patching is completed, the practical compensating controls follow from the fact that the bug requires an already-authenticated low-privileged local session, so reducing the number of untrusted interactive logins is the highest-value measure: remove or disable unnecessary local accounts, avoid granting interactive or RDP access to shared GPU hosts (notably VDI and multi-tenant virtualization hosts, where the Guest Driver and Virtual GPU Manager expand the attack surface), and restrict who can open sessions on machines with sensitive workloads. The trade-off is reduced operational flexibility for shared-workstation and VDI use cases, and these measures do not eliminate the flaw - they only shrink the pool of potential local callers. Monitoring display-driver fault telemetry, system bugchecks/TDR resets, and unexpected GPU driver restarts can provide early warning of attempted abuse, though such signals are noisy and should be triaged against legitimate driver instability.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 3 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw sits in the kernel-mode layer of the NVIDIA display driver (the privileged component exposed as nvlddmkm.sys on Windows and the NVIDIA kernel modules on Linux) that services requests forwarded from user-mode graphics and compute APIs. CWE-862 (Missing Authorization) describes the root cause: an access-control check on a privileged driver entry point is absent or insufficient, so a caller holding only ordinary local user rights can reach an operation intended to be restricted. Because the vulnerable code runs in kernel mode, the observable consequence is a fault or resource exhaustion that terminates or destabilizes the operating system rather than a user-space crash. The affected CPE strings enumerate NVIDIA GeForce, NVIDIA RTX/Quadro/NVS, and NVIDIA Tesla product families, and the ENISA EUVD record additionally covers virtualization components - the vGPU Guest Driver and Virtual GPU Manager - where a guest-side caller interacts with the hypervisor-hosted GPU manager. As assessed, the primitives available to an attacker are bounded: the misconfiguration yields availability loss only (C:N/I:N/A:H), with no path demonstrated to memory corruption, code execution, or information leakage.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Local authenticated low-priv trigger of a kernel driver (AV:L/PR:L/AC:L), no interaction, no confidentiality or integrity impact, availability-only DoS (A:H).
Primary rating from Vendor (nvidia).
CVSS VectorVendor: nvidia
DescriptionCVE.org
NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Windows and Linux contains a vulnerability in the kernel mode layer, where an attacker can cause improper access control. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to denial of service.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
Same weakness CWE-862 – Missing Authorization
View allSame technique Authentication Bypass
View allVendor StatusVendor
SUSE
Severity: Important| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Public Cloud 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.2 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 16.0 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Public Cloud 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.4 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.5 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.6 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.6 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap Micro 5.5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for NVIDIA 16.1 | Affected |
EUVD-2026-90168
GHSA-x8m3-359c-5h7c
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB