Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as low-privilege broker user
-
DeliveryBind queue to topic exchange with consecutive # segments
-
ExploitPublish messages triggering unmemoized trie re-traversal
-
ExecutionCombinatorial CPU and memory exhaustion
-
ImpactRouting disrupted for all tenants
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Algorithmic complexity limits
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires an authenticated RabbitMQ account (PR:L) holding permissions to bind a queue to a TOPIC exchange and to publish messages to it on a virtual host. The specific trigger is a binding key with two or more consecutive '#' multi-segment wildcards, which the vendor fix explicitly guards (bookkeeping only engages when Hashes >= 2); a single '#' cannot cause the combinatorial re-visits. Exploitation is limited by the need for valid credentials with configure/write rights and affects broker versions prior to 4.3.5; there is no user-interaction or non-default-plugin requirement, and topic exchanges are a standard routing feature, so the main gate is authentication rather than an unusual deployment mode. Impact is availability-only (routing disruption for all co-tenants), with no data disclosure or modification. |
| Impact | This is a genuine but conditional denial-of-service issue, not a critical priority. The CVSS 4.0 vector (7.1, AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H) correctly models a pure availability impact with no confidentiality or integrity effect, requiring only low privileges and no user interaction - consistent with the CWE-407 (algorithmic complexity) root cause. Signals do NOT indicate widespread exploitation: no EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit code are provided, so this is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis' rather than an actively-exploited flaw. The commit diff confirms the technical mechanism (unmemoized trie traversal with two or more '#' edges causing combinatorial state re-visits), so the vulnerability itself is well-substantiated by vendor source. The 'Information Disclosure' tag directly CONTRADICTS the CVSS vector (VC:N/VI:N), and the 'Microsoft' vendor tag is wrong - RabbitMQ is an open-source Broadcom/VMware/Pivotal project. Real-world risk is moderate: exploitation needs an authenticated broker user with rights to bind to and publish on a topic exchange, but topic exchanges are a common default routing pattern, making this more reachable than RabbitMQ's plugin-gated or OAuth-gated DoS siblings. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An authenticated tenant with configure/write permissions on a virtual host declares a queue and binds it to a topic exchange using a binding key containing consecutive '#' wildcard segments, then publishes messages to that exchange. Each publish forces the topic matcher to redundantly re-visit the same trie-node/routing-key-suffix states without memoization, exploding CPU and memory usage and stalling message routing for all tenants sharing the broker. No public proof-of-concept is provided, but the vendor commit clearly documents the combinatorial blow-up, making a working trigger straightforward to construct. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 25, 2026
Denial of service against RabbitMQ topic exchange routing can be triggered by an authenticated user who holds permissions to bind a queue to a topic exchange and to publish to that exchange: a binding key containing consecutive '#' multi-segment wildcards, combined with a publication that matches it, drives the topic matcher into combinatorially repeated trie walks and duplicate destination materialization, exhausting CPU and memory and disrupting routing for all tenants on the broker. All RabbitMQ server versions prior to 4.3.5 are affected, with impact assessed as availability-only (CVSS:3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H; vendor-published 7.1); there is no data disclosure or modification, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The issue is a conditional but genuine algorithmic-complexity DoS rather than a critical priority, because exploitation requires valid credentials with configure and write privileges on a topic exchange, and it is remediated by the vendor in 4.3.5.
RemediationAI
Upgrade to RabbitMQ 4.3.5 or later - vendor-released patch: 4.3.5, the release that contains the memoization fix (upstream commit c5ed7c4e97e02be688730803604cc7a88dbe4864; advisory GHSA-h964-v5mf-22cq at https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/security/advisories/GHSA-h964-v5mf-22cq, release notes at https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.3.5). If an immediate upgrade is not possible, compensate by restricting who can bind to topic exchanges: review and trim RabbitMQ permissions so that untrusted or low-trust users have read-only or no 'configure' access on vhosts hosting topic exchanges, since the trigger requires both a binding with repeated '#' segments and a matching publication - the trade-off is that legitimate dynamic/self-service routing topologies will break for the affected principals. Additionally, audit existing bindings and remove or rewrite any binding key containing consecutive '#' segments (for example replace 'a.#.#.b' with 'a.#.b'), which is safe because such keys are semantically redundant, but must be coordinated with producers/consumers that declared them. Monitor broker CPU and memory for spikes correlated with topic-exchange publishing as a detection control; note that simply rate-limiting publish is a weak mitigation because a single well-formed routing key can still trigger the worst-case walk. There is no vendor-released patch for versions earlier than 4.3.5 other than upgrading to that release line.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
RabbitMQ topic exchanges route messages using a trie (prefix tree) of binding keys, where '*' matches exactly one dot-delimited word and '#' matches zero or more words. In the affected code path (deps/rabbit/src/rabbit_db_topic_exchange.erl, the trie_match family of functions), each '#' edge causes the walker to both advance the word cursor and skip words, so a binding key such as 'a.#.#.b' combined with a suitable routing key allows the same {trie node, remaining routing-key suffix} state to be reached along many distinct paths. Without memoization the number of revisits grows combinatorially with routing-key length, and because matched destinations are accumulated before deduplication, the matcher materializes duplicate queues/bindings repeatedly - causing CPU-bound routing loops plus memory pressure from the transient result sets. This is CWE-407 (Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity) rather than a memory-safety or injection flaw. The upstream fix (commit c5ed7c4e97e02be688730803604cc7a88dbe4864) introduces a 'Hashes' counter and a state tuple carrying a 'Seen' map that records visited {Node, Words} pairs; bookkeeping only engages once Hashes >= 2, so single-'#' walkers and the common case pay no memoization cost, while two or more '#' edges on the path short-circuit already-visited states. Affected CPE data identifies the whole rabbitmq-server product line as in scope (cpe:2.3:a:rabbitmq:rabbitmq-server:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*), covering every release before 4.3.5; note that the accompanying tagging metadata (e.g. 'Information Disclosure') diverges from the assessed, availability-only impact and should not be relied upon.
Know when Rabbitmq gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Network-reachable with low complexity but requires an authenticated user able to bind/publish (PR:L); impact is pure availability (A:H) affecting all tenants, with no confidentiality or integrity effect.
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Primary rating from Vendor (GitHub_M).
CVSS VectorVendor: GitHub_M
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Prior to 4.3.5, an authenticated user who can bind a queue to a topic exchange and publish to it can use consecutive
segments in a binding key to make both topic matchers revisit the same trie-node and routing-key-suffix states without memoization. The matcher materializes duplicate destinations before deduplication, causing combinatorial CPU work and memory pressure that can disrupt routing for all tenants. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.3.5.
Technical POC Analysis
CWE-407 (Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity); the advisory also tags CWE-1333, though no regex is involved.
Full technical POC analysis - root cause, step-by-step exploitation and patch breakdown - is part of the Pro and Business plans.
Executive ViewAI
RabbitMQ brokers running any server release prior to 4.3.5 can have message routing disrupted across every tenant on the broker by a single authenticated user who already holds queue-binding and publish rights on a topic exchange, converting ordinary operational credentials into a broker-wide availability risk. The impact is availability-only - no data disclosure or modification - but because the failure mode is CPU and memory exhaustion of shared routing infrastructure, every application and team hosted on the same broker experiences the outage simultaneously. Leadership should treat this as a resilience and privileged-access-governance exposure rather than a data-breach scenario, and note that no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis, so interim mitigations are required: restrict queue-binding and publish rights on topic exchanges to a minimal, reviewed set of service accounts and remove standing configure/write permissions; prohibit or reject binding keys containing consecutive '#' multi-segment wildcards in application code and deployment review; segregate high-value tenants onto dedicated brokers or vhosts to limit blast radius; enable broker resource alarms, publisher flow control, and CPU/memory monitoring with alerting on anomalous binding creation; and prepare a runbook to identify and disconnect offending connections during an availability event.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Sensitive credential disclosure in RabbitMQ affects installations running the management plugin with OAuth 2 configured
Pivotal RabbitMQ, versions 3.7.x prior to 3.7.21 and 3.8.x prior to 3.8.1, and RabbitMQ for Pivotal Platform, 1.16.x ver
Denial of service in the RabbitMQ Java client library (com.rabbitmq:amqp-client ≤ 5.30.0) allows a malicious or compromi
An issue was discovered in Pivotal RabbitMQ 3.x before 3.5.8 and 3.6.x before 3.6.6 and RabbitMQ for PCF 1.5.x before 1.
Parsing desynchronization in the RabbitMQ amqp091-go AMQP 0.9.1 client library before 1.13.0 lets a malicious or comprom
RabbitMQ's amqp091-go Go client library, in all versions before 1.13.0, builds TLS configuration from amqps:// URIs with
RabbitMQ is a multi-protocol messaging broker. Rated medium severity (CVSS 5.4), this vulnerability is remotely exploita
RabbitMQ brokers that use the OAuth2 plugin can silently fall back to disabled TLS certificate verification when no CA b
Silent AMQP 0.9.1 metadata corruption in the RabbitMQ amqp091-go Go client library prior to 1.13.0 lets an application t
TLS client-authentication bypass in the RabbitMQ trust-store plugin lets a remote unauthenticated attacker whose forged
TLS certificate validation is completely bypassed in the RabbitMQ Java client library (`com.rabbitmq:amqp-client`) prior
Denial of service in the official RabbitMQ Go client library amqp091-go (versions prior to 1.13.0): a malicious, comprom
Same weakness CWE-407 – Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity
View allVendor StatusVendor
SUSE
Severity: Moderate| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.1 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Enterprise Storage 7 | Affected |
| SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2-BCL | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3-BCL | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.2 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.2 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.2 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.3 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.4 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.5 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.6 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for NVIDIA 16.1 | Affected |
EUVD-2026-87243
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
GitHub
Exploit-DB