Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as low-privilege management user with vhost access
-
DeliveryCraft ~4.5 MB PUT to super-streams endpoint with oversized binding-keys
-
ExploitHandler parses string and builds stream list pre-permission-check
-
ExecutionLarge transient memory allocation exceeds container limit
-
ImpactNode OOM-killed, broker denial of service
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Resource consumption limits
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Impact The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires the rabbitmq_stream_management plugin to be enabled (non-default) and an authenticated management-UI user account that has access to the target vhost - but the user needs NO configure, write, or read permission (PR:L per the vector). The attack targets PUT /api/stream/super-streams/{vhost}/{name} with a binding-keys field, and reliable node death requires the broker to run under a constrained memory limit (the advisory demonstrates a 768 MB Docker container killed by one ~4.5 MB PUT); on hosts with ample memory the impact degrades to a transient spike rather than a guaranteed crash. Limiting factors: plugin must be enabled, valid management credentials required, and effective denial of service is strongly dependent on a low memory ceiling. |
| Impact | The provided CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H, base 7.1) is internally consistent with the description: a network-reachable, low-complexity, low-privilege attack causing pure availability impact (a node crash) with no confidentiality or integrity effect. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC are present in the input, so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis' - this is a fresh GitHub-advisory-sourced DoS rather than a known exploited threat. The realistic priority is MODERATE-to-LOW despite the 7.1: two significant gating conditions temper it. First, the rabbitmq_stream_management plugin must be enabled (non-default). Second, the demonstrated node kill depended on a tight memory limit (768 MB container) - on a broker with generous memory the same 4.5 MB body causes a transient spike rather than a guaranteed crash, which is why the observed impact is so tied to the Docker deployment mentioned in the tags. One conflicting signal to verify: the description attributes the vulnerability to the attacker-controlled 'binding-keys' field, but the single provided commit diff (0f3defd1) only adds a MAX_PARTITIONS=1000 bound on the 'partitions' field - the binding-keys allocation fix is presumably in the second listed commit (eb11bc44), which was not supplied, so the exact patched code path for the described vector is not independently confirmed here. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who holds any management-UI account with access to a vhost - but without configure/write/read permission - sends a single HTTP PUT to /api/stream/super-streams/{vhost}/{name} with a ~4.5 MB JSON body whose binding-keys field is a huge comma-separated string. The handler parses the attacker string and materializes the full stream-name list before performing the resource permission check, driving a large transient allocation that OOM-kills a memory-limited (e.g. 768 MB Docker) RabbitMQ node. No public exploit code is identified, but the technique is trivially reproducible from the advisory description. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 25, 2026
Node-wide denial of service in RabbitMQ server 4.1.0 through 4.1.10, 4.2.0 through 4.2.8, and 4.3.0 through 4.3.2 occurs when the non-default rabbitmq_stream_management plugin is enabled: an authenticated management-UI user with access to the target vhost - but no configure, write, or read permission on the resulting streams - can issue a single PUT to /api/stream/super-streams/{vhost}/{name} whose binding-keys field is expanded into the full stream-name list before any resource permission check, forcing a large transient allocation. The advisory demonstrates one ~4.5 MB JSON PUT killing a RabbitMQ container capped at 768 MB, so effective denial of service is strongly dependent on a low memory ceiling; on hosts with ample memory the impact degrades to a temporary resource spike rather than a guaranteed crash. No exploitation in the wild has been confirmed and no public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, but the low privilege bar (any valid management credentials with vhost access) and high availability impact make it a realistic insider or compromised-credential risk for constrained deployments. The issue is fixed in RabbitMQ 4.3.3, 4.2.9, and 4.1.11.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patches are available and should be applied as the primary fix: upgrade to RabbitMQ 4.3.3, 4.2.9, or 4.1.11 depending on the deployed minor line (advisory GHSA-2hm4-4438-49q8; release tags v4.2.9 and v4.3.3; fix commits 0f3defd176e027f54f447beee168d906d4f109b6 and eb11bc44005fd6d327a78bf171bc598207778c9b). Note that the fix also enforces a hard cap of 1000 partitions per super-stream and rejects non-numeric, zero, negative, or oversized partition values with HTTP 400, so any legitimate automation that relied on partition counts above 1000 will begin failing after upgrade and must be adjusted. If immediate patching is not possible, the most effective compensating control is to disable the rabbitmq_stream_management plugin entirely (rabbitmq-plugins disable rabbitmq_stream_management) - the trade-off is loss of the super-stream management HTTP API and related streaming management features, so this is only viable where those capabilities are unused. Restrict access to the management HTTP interface (default port 15672) to trusted administrative networks and remove management credentials from any low-privilege or shared accounts, understanding that this reduces but does not eliminate exposure because the attack only requires an authenticated vhost-scoped user. As a last-resort hardening measure, raise or remove container memory limits and enable RabbitMQ memory alarms and container restart policies so a transient allocation spike is absorbed or the node recovers automatically; this is a resilience measure only and does not remove the underlying resource-consumption bug.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 3 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw is an instance of CWE-400 (Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) in the Erlang/OTP-based RabbitMQ broker, specifically in the rabbitmq_stream_management plugin's super-stream HTTP handler (rabbit_stream_super_stream_mgmt.erl). Super-streams are logical groupings of underlying streams, and the management API allows a client to supply a binding-keys field - a comma-separated string that the handler parses and materializes into the complete list of stream names - together with a partitions count. The defect is an ordering problem in the request pipeline: the handler builds that full stream-name list, allocating memory proportional to the attacker-supplied input, before it evaluates whether the caller holds configure/write/read permissions on the resulting streams. Because authorization is deferred until after allocation, a management user who is authorized for the vhost but deliberately under-privileged for those streams can still drive an oversized transient allocation. The upstream fix hardens the same code path with input validation rather than reordering alone: commit 0f3defd176e027f54f447beee168d906d4f109b6 introduces a ?MAX_PARTITIONS limit of 1000 and rejects partition values that are non-numeric, zero or negative, or greater than 1000 with an HTTP 400 bad_request, and the accompanying test suite (http_SUITE.erl) adds create_super_stream_partition_limits covering zero, negative, 1001, and 500000000 partition values. A second commit, eb11bc44005fd6d327a78bf171bc598207778c9b, is also referenced. The practical trigger requires the plugin to be enabled (it is not part of a default installation) and direct network reachability to the management interface, consistent with CVSS AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N and a pure availability impact (VC:N/VI:N/VA:H).
Know when Rabbitmq gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Network-reachable management API, low complexity, low-privilege authenticated user (PR:L), no UI, pure availability node crash with no confidentiality or integrity impact.
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Primary rating from Vendor (GitHub_M).
CVSS VectorVendor: GitHub_M
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. From 4.1.0 until 4.3.3, 4.2.9, and 4.1.11, Stream Management Super-Stream Binding Keys Allocation Allows Low-Privilege Node Denial of Service. rabbitMQ 4.3.1 with rabbitmqstreammanagement enabled accepts PUT /api/stream/super-streams/{vhost}/{name} requests from an authenticated management user that can access the target vhost. When the request body contains the binding-keys field, the handler parses the attacker-controlled comma-separated string and builds the full stream-name list before checking whether the user has permission to configure the resulting streams. A low-privileged management user with vhost access but no configure, write, or read permission can therefore force large transient allocations before the resource permission check. In a 768 MB memory-limited container, one HTTP PUT with about 4.5 MB of JSON body killed the RabbitMQ container with Docker state exited true An authenticated low-privileged management user can kill a memory-limited RabbitMQ node with one HTTP This issue is fixed in versions 4.3.3, 4.2.9, and 4.1.11.
Technical POC Analysis
CWE-400 (Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) - a check-ordering / pre-authorization allocation flaw in the rabbitmqstreammanagement plugin, file deps/rabbitmqstreammanagement/src/rabbitstreamsuperstre…
Full technical POC analysis - root cause, step-by-step exploitation and patch breakdown - is part of the Pro and Business plans.
Executive ViewAI
RabbitMQ message broker versions 4.1.0 through 4.1.10, 4.2.0 through 4.2.8, and 4.3.0 through 4.3.2 can be forced into a node-wide outage by a single oversized API request whenever the optional rabbitmq_stream_management plugin is enabled, taking down the messaging backbone for every application that depends on that node. The blast radius is bounded by two conditions: the non-default plugin must be turned on, and the host must be under a tight memory ceiling, which is where the advisory demonstrates a full container kill from one ~4.5 MB request. Leadership should care because messaging outages cascade directly into order processing, notification, and integration pipelines, and no vendor patch is available at this time.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: disable the non-default rabbitmq_stream_management plugin where stream super-streams are not required; enforce HTTP request body size limits at the reverse proxy or load balancer fronting the management API; restrict management-UI/API access to trusted administrative networks; apply least-privilege vhost and stream permissions to management users; maintain memory headroom above a constrained ceiling and monitor for transient allocation spikes on /api/stream/super-streams.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
Sensitive credential disclosure in RabbitMQ affects installations running the management plugin with OAuth 2 configured
Pivotal RabbitMQ, versions 3.7.x prior to 3.7.21 and 3.8.x prior to 3.8.1, and RabbitMQ for Pivotal Platform, 1.16.x ver
Denial of service in the RabbitMQ Java client library (com.rabbitmq:amqp-client ≤ 5.30.0) allows a malicious or compromi
An issue was discovered in Pivotal RabbitMQ 3.x before 3.5.8 and 3.6.x before 3.6.6 and RabbitMQ for PCF 1.5.x before 1.
Parsing desynchronization in the RabbitMQ amqp091-go AMQP 0.9.1 client library before 1.13.0 lets a malicious or comprom
RabbitMQ's amqp091-go Go client library, in all versions before 1.13.0, builds TLS configuration from amqps:// URIs with
RabbitMQ is a multi-protocol messaging broker. Rated medium severity (CVSS 5.4), this vulnerability is remotely exploita
RabbitMQ brokers that use the OAuth2 plugin can silently fall back to disabled TLS certificate verification when no CA b
Silent AMQP 0.9.1 metadata corruption in the RabbitMQ amqp091-go Go client library prior to 1.13.0 lets an application t
TLS client-authentication bypass in the RabbitMQ trust-store plugin lets a remote unauthenticated attacker whose forged
TLS certificate validation is completely bypassed in the RabbitMQ Java client library (`com.rabbitmq:amqp-client`) prior
Denial of service in the official RabbitMQ Go client library amqp091-go (versions prior to 1.13.0): a malicious, comprom
Same weakness CWE-400 – Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
View allSame technique Denial Of Service
View allVendor StatusVendor
SUSE
Severity: Moderate| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.1 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP4 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP5 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP6 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP6 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4-LTSS | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5-LTSS | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Enterprise Storage 7 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2-ESPOS | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2-LTSS | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3-ESPOS | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3-LTSS | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-ESPOS | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-ESPOS | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP2 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP3 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP2 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP3 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2-BCL | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2-LTSS | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3-BCL | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3-LTSS | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP2 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.1 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.2 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy LTS 4.3 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.1 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.2 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server LTS 4.3 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.1 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.2 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.3 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server LTS 4.3 | Not-Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.3 | Not-Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.4 | Not-Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.5 | Not-Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.6 | Not-Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.6 | Not-Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for NVIDIA 16.1 | Affected |
EUVD-2026-87241
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
GitHub
Exploit-DB