Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as AMQP 0-9-1 publisher
-
DeliveryDeclare content-header body_size 2^63-1
-
ExploitStream fragments without completing assembly
-
ExecutionBypass check_msg_size limit
-
ImpactExhaust node/cluster memory (DoS)
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Resource allocation limits
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Impact The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires an authenticated AMQP 0-9-1 client account that holds publish permission on the target broker (PR:L); no user interaction, no non-default configuration, and no special plugin is needed since AMQP 0-9-1 is the default and most widely used protocol. The attack works against default configurations because the content-header BodySize (uint64) is stored without validation and the max_message_size check runs only at assembly completion, which the attacker prevents by never completing assembly. Limiting factors: valid publish credentials are mandatory (not exploitable pre-auth), and the impact is confined to denial of service - the memory alarm offers partial, reactive mitigation but does not prevent the condition. Affects RabbitMQ prior to 4.3.0, 4.2.6, 4.1.11, 4.0.20, and 3.13.15. |
| Impact | The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N, VA:H only) accurately frames this as a network-reachable, low-complexity, no-user-interaction availability attack requiring only low privilege - a single authenticated AMQP 0-9-1 client with publish permission. Impact is purely availability (VC:N/VI:N/VA:H); there is no confidentiality or integrity exposure. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit are present in the supplied data, so this is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis' rather than active exploitation. The realistic risk is moderate-to-notable: the flaw is trivially triggerable by any legitimate publisher (a very low bar in multi-tenant brokers) and the impact is cluster-wide - one reader process accumulating unbounded memory degrades all publishers or OOMs the node, and the vendor explicitly notes the memory alarm is only reactive/partial mitigation. The gating factor keeping this out of 'critical' territory is that it requires valid publish credentials (PR:L) and yields DoS only, not code execution or data disclosure. No signals conflict; the 7.1 score is consistent with an authenticated, high-availability-impact DoS. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker holding any valid AMQP 0-9-1 account with publish permission on a RabbitMQ node declares a message content-header with body_size = 2^63-1 and then streams body fragments indefinitely. Because check_msg_size only fires when frame assembly completes, the size limit is never enforced, so the reader process accumulates memory without bound until the memory alarm degrades all cluster publishers or the node exhausts RAM and crashes. No public proof-of-concept is referenced in the available data. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 23, 2026
Denial of service in RabbitMQ Server (versions prior to 4.3.0, 4.2.6, 4.1.11, 4.0.20, and 3.13.15) allows an authenticated AMQP 0-9-1 client with publish permission to exhaust broker memory by declaring an excessive content-header BodySize and streaming message fragments without completing assembly. The unvalidated uint64 BodySize bypasses the max_message_size check, which only runs at assembly completion, causing unbounded memory accumulation in the reader process until the memory alarm triggers or the node runs out of memory, degrading all publishers cluster-wide. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and vendor patches are available.
RemediationAI
Upgrade to RabbitMQ 4.3.0, 4.2.6, 4.1.11, 4.0.20, or 3.13.15, which contain the fix that validates the content-header BodySize against max_message_size before assembly. See the vendor advisory at https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/security/advisories/GHSA-q8g2-pc7m-m3jw and release notes for 4.2.6 at https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.2.6 and 4.3.0 at https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.3.0. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict publish permissions to only fully trusted AMQP 0-9-1 clients, understanding that this may reduce legitimate publishing capability; be aware that the memory alarm is reactive and does not prevent memory exhaustion, so monitor broker memory usage closely and be prepared to restart affected nodes to clear accumulated memory.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 4 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The vulnerability resides in RabbitMQ's AMQP 0-9-1 protocol handling, specifically in the processing of the content-header frame's BodySize field, a 64-bit unsigned integer that indicates the total size of the message body to follow. RabbitMQ stores this value without validating it against the configured max_message_size limit; the size check is deferred until the message assembly completes. An attacker with a valid AMQP 0-9-1 connection and publish permission can declare body_size = 2^63-1 and then stream fragments indefinitely, never completing assembly, so check_msg_size never fires and the accumulated body size grows without bound. This is a CWE-770 (Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling) issue. The affected product is RabbitMQ server, identified by CPE cpe:2.3:a:rabbitmq:rabbitmq-server:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*. The memory alarm is reactive and only partially mitigates by blocking publishers after memory pressure becomes high, but it does not prevent the initial memory exhaustion.
Know when Rabbitmq gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Network-reachable, low-complexity attack needing only low-privilege publish credentials (PR:L); pure availability impact via memory exhaustion, no confidentiality or integrity effect, scope unchanged within the broker.
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Primary rating from Vendor (GitHub_M).
CVSS VectorVendor: GitHub_M
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Prior to versions 4.3.0, 4.2.6, 4.1.11, 4.0.20, and 3.13.15, The content-header BodySize (a uint64) was stored without validation against max_message_size. The size check ran only when assembly completed. By declaring body_size = 2^63-1 and then streaming fragments, a client ensured that check_msg_size never fired, so the accumulated body size went unbounded. A reader process accumulates memory until the memory alarm fires, degrading all publishers cluster-wide, or until the node runs out of memory. The memory alarm provides only partial mitigation, since it is reactive rather than preventive. AMQP 0-9-1 is the most widely used protocol, and any publisher can trigger this condition. Preconditions include Any authenticated AMQP 0-9-1 client with publish permission can exploit this.. This issue is fixed in versions 4.3.0, 4.2.6, 4.1.11, 4.0.20, and 3.13.15.
Technical POC Analysis
CWE-770 (Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling), in the RabbitMQ broker's AMQP 0-9-1 body assembly path (rabbitmq-server repository, advisory GHSA-q8g2-pc7m-m3jw).
Full technical POC analysis - root cause, step-by-step exploitation and patch breakdown - is part of the Pro and Business plans.
Executive ViewAI
RabbitMQ Server contains a high-severity denial-of-service flaw that allows a messaging client holding publish rights to drive a broker node out of memory, degrading or halting publishing across the entire cluster. Because RabbitMQ typically sits on the critical path for order processing, event streaming, and inter-service communication, a single privileged or compromised publishing account can stall many downstream business services at once. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the attack requires an existing publish-permission credential, which limits exposure to trusted insiders or compromised application accounts.
Patch status is conflicting in the source data: the patch field indicates no vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis, while the advisory text references fixed versions 4.3.0, 4.2.6, 4.1.11, 4.0.20, and 3.13.15 - validate against the vendor before planning the upgrade. Until a fixed version is confirmed and deployed, limit publish permissions to trusted service accounts only, tighten vm_memory_high_watermark so the memory alarm triggers before node exhaustion, reduce max_message_size to match legitimate payloads, and monitor per-connection memory growth and incomplete message assembly for early warning.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
Sensitive credential disclosure in RabbitMQ affects installations running the management plugin with OAuth 2 configured
Pivotal RabbitMQ, versions 3.7.x prior to 3.7.21 and 3.8.x prior to 3.8.1, and RabbitMQ for Pivotal Platform, 1.16.x ver
Denial of service in the RabbitMQ Java client library (com.rabbitmq:amqp-client ≤ 5.30.0) allows a malicious or compromi
An issue was discovered in Pivotal RabbitMQ 3.x before 3.5.8 and 3.6.x before 3.6.6 and RabbitMQ for PCF 1.5.x before 1.
Parsing desynchronization in the RabbitMQ amqp091-go AMQP 0.9.1 client library before 1.13.0 lets a malicious or comprom
RabbitMQ's amqp091-go Go client library, in all versions before 1.13.0, builds TLS configuration from amqps:// URIs with
RabbitMQ is a multi-protocol messaging broker. Rated medium severity (CVSS 5.4), this vulnerability is remotely exploita
RabbitMQ brokers that use the OAuth2 plugin can silently fall back to disabled TLS certificate verification when no CA b
Silent AMQP 0.9.1 metadata corruption in the RabbitMQ amqp091-go Go client library prior to 1.13.0 lets an application t
TLS client-authentication bypass in the RabbitMQ trust-store plugin lets a remote unauthenticated attacker whose forged
TLS certificate validation is completely bypassed in the RabbitMQ Java client library (`com.rabbitmq:amqp-client`) prior
Denial of service in the official RabbitMQ Go client library amqp091-go (versions prior to 1.13.0): a malicious, comprom
Same technique Denial Of Service
View allVendor StatusVendor
SUSE
Severity: Moderate| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.1 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Enterprise Storage 7 | Affected |
| SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2-BCL | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3-BCL | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.2 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.2 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.2 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.3 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.4 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.5 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.6 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for NVIDIA 16.1 | Affected |
EUVD-2026-85652
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
GitHub
Exploit-DB