Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as normal workspace user
-
DeliveryObtain victim document/paragraph UUID
-
ExploitCraft operate request with attacker-owned knowledge_id path
-
ExecutionSubmit request bypassing object-ownership check
-
ImpactRead or modify victim knowledge-base content
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Object-level authorization, IDOR prevention
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an authenticated normal workspace user account on the MaxKB instance (PR:L) plus knowledge of a valid victim document or paragraph UUID. The attacker uses an operate route on a knowledge base they legitimately own (attacker-controlled knowledge_id in the path) while supplying the victim's document_id/paragraph_id in the body/parameters; the routes authorize only knowledge_id and never verify the object belongs to that knowledge base. Affected versions are 2.0.0 through 2.10.2-lts. Limiting factors: attacker must already have a valid account in the same MaxKB deployment, must know or discover a victim object UUID, and no fixed version is available (mitigation currently requires restricting untrusted multi-tenant access or applying workarounds). No user interaction is required (UI:N). |
| Impact | This is a broken-object-level-authorization / IDOR flaw (CWE-639) whose real-world risk is moderate and firmly gated by authentication. The provided CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N (5.4, Medium) is internally consistent with the description: network-reachable, low complexity, but requiring an authenticated low-privilege workspace user (PR:L). No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC were provided, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation. The impact is deliberately scoped to C:L/I:L - the attacker can read AND modify another user's knowledge-base documents/paragraphs, but not delete/deny service (A:N) and not achieve full disclosure of the whole system, which is why each impact axis is Low rather than High. Two data caveats: (1) the input Tag 'Authentication Bypass' conflicts with the description and CWE-639 - this is an authorization (object-ownership) failure by an already-authenticated user, not an authentication bypass; (2) no fixed version exists as of this review, which raises operational urgency for exposed multi-tenant deployments even though the CVSS is only Medium. Net: a real, patch-pending priority for organizations running shared-workspace MaxKB with untrusted internal users, but not a mass-exploitation, high-CVSS emergency. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A legitimate low-privilege user of a shared MaxKB instance who owns their own knowledge base obtains (or guesses/observes) the UUID of a document or paragraph belonging to a victim's knowledge base. They issue an operate request whose path references their OWN knowledge_id but whose document_id/paragraph_id points at the victim's object; because only knowledge_id is authorized, the server reads or overwrites the victim's content. No public exploit code was provided, and exploitation requires an authenticated account plus knowledge of a valid victim object UUID. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 21, 2026
Broken object-level authorization (IDOR) in MaxKB 2.0.0 through 2.10.2-lts lets an authenticated workspace user read or modify documents and paragraphs that belong to another user's knowledge base by sending an attacker-owned knowledge_id in the request path together with a victim's document_id or paragraph_id. The affected operate routes authorize only the knowledge_id and never verify that the referenced object actually belongs to that knowledge base, so a low-privileged account plus a known victim object UUID is sufficient, with no user interaction required (CVSS 3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N; base score 5.4). No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and no vendor-released fixed version is available, so real-world risk is moderate and firmly gated by the requirement for an authenticated account on the same deployment.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch is identified at time of analysis: every version in the 2.0.0 through 2.10.2-lts range, including 2.10.2-lts, remains vulnerable, so track the vendor advisory GHSA-58cm-c5jq-96vf (https://github.com/1Panel-dev/MaxKB/security/advisories/GHSA-58cm-c5jq-96vf) and upgrade to the first patched release as soon as it is published. Until then, apply compensating controls that match the exploit prerequisites: because exploitation requires an authenticated workspace account (PR:L) plus knowledge of a victim document or paragraph UUID, the single most effective control is to stop issuing workspace accounts to untrusted users and audit existing ones, at the cost of losing collaborative access for those users; alternatively, block the document and paragraph operate endpoints at a reverse proxy or WAF if no legitimate workflow depends on them, accepting the loss of those management functions; or split deployments so each tenant runs its own MaxKB instance, which removes the cross-object pivot entirely but increases operational overhead. As a defense-in-depth measure, restrict network reachability of the MaxKB API to trusted networks or a VPN instead of exposing it to the internet (trade-off: remote users lose direct access), and monitor application logs for document_id or paragraph_id accesses that do not correspond to the owning knowledge_id so attempted IDOR pivots can be detected while a patch is pending.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
MaxKB is an open-source enterprise AI assistant and knowledge-base platform maintained by 1Panel-dev, used to ingest documents and serve retrieval-augmented generation over them. The reported issue is CWE-639, Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key, a textbook broken object level authorization (BOLA/IDOR) pattern. In the affected releases the document and paragraph 'operate' routes perform their authorization check solely against the knowledge_id carried in the request path, and then resolve the target record by document_id or paragraph_id without re-validating that the record is a member of that knowledge base. Because the object identifier is attacker-controllable while authorization is bound to a different identifier, an authenticated workspace user can use a knowledge base they legitimately own as a pivot to reach objects in another tenant's knowledge base. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:1panel-dev:maxkb confirms the vendor and product scoping, and the accompanying tag set (Authentication Bypass, MaxKB, 1Panel Dev) reflects the same broken-authorization family. Impact is bounded within the same security scope: confidentiality and integrity are rated Low and availability None, and the underlying technology is a standard REST API over a multi-tenant document store, which is why the flaw is exploitable over the network with low privileges but only Object-ID-level effect.
Know when Maxkb gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Network-reachable route (AV:N/AC:L) requires an authenticated low-privilege workspace user (PR:L) and yields cross-user read and modify of KB content (C:L/I:L) with no availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (GitHub_M).
CVSS VectorVendor: GitHub_M
DescriptionCVE.org
MaxKB is an open-source AI assistant for enterprise. From version 2.0.0 through 2.10.2-lts, document and paragraph operate routes authorize only knowledge_id in the request path, then query the target Document by document_id or Paragraph by paragraph_id without confirming that the object belongs to that knowledge base. A normal workspace user with a known victim document or paragraph UUID can use an attacker-owned knowledge-base path to read or modify content in another user's knowledge base. No fixed version is available as of this review.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
MaxKB prior to version 1.10.8-lts contains an incomplete sandbox implementation that only blacklists binary execution in
Command injection in MaxKB before 2.10.5-lts allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary shell commands
Sandbox escape and privilege escalation in MaxKB 2.3.1 and earlier allow an attacker who can submit or trigger custom Py
Server-side request forgery in MaxKB before 2.10.0 allows any authenticated user holding the default workspace USER role
Authenticated workspace members on MaxKB deployments prior to 2.10.5-lts can escalate to root-level command execution by
OS command injection in MaxKB (1Panel-dev's open-source enterprise AI assistant) before 2.10.0-lts lets an authenticated
Server-side request forgery in MaxKB (open-source AI assistant from 1Panel-dev) allows an authenticated user with permis
Privilege escalation in MaxKB 2.3.1 and earlier allows an authenticated, low-privileged user to overwrite the built-in d
Authentication bypass in MaxKB (1Panel-dev) versions prior to 2.9.0 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to invoke we
Cross-workspace read and modification of model parameter defaults in MaxKB 2.10.3-lts and earlier is possible for an aut
MaxKB versions 2.7.1 and below allow authenticated users with tool execution privileges to bypass the LD_PRELOAD-based s
MaxKB versions 2.7.1 and below allow authenticated attackers with workspace privileges to execute arbitrary code by expl
EUVD-2026-84162
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
GitHub
VulDB
Exploit-DB