Skip to main content

Nextcloud Server EUVDEUVD-2026-83973

| CVE-2026-77165 MEDIUM
Improper Access Control (CWE-284)
2026-09-21 hackerone GHSA-77h3-rj6p-8wj8
6.5
CVSS 3.0 · Vendor: hackerone
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate as low-privileged user
  2. Exploit
    Place TYPE_TOKEN lock on shared file
  3. Execution
    Lock ownership prevents owner removal
  4. Impact
    File permanently locked, DB-only recovery

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Access control enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Defense Evasion

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires an authenticated Nextcloud account (PR:L) with the ability to place a TYPE_TOKEN (WebDAV/token-based) lock on a file, typically on shared files where multiple users interact. The defect is that once such a lock is set by one user, the file owner has no interface path to release it - recovery requires direct database intervention by an administrator. Exploitation is limited by the need for valid credentials and file-sharing context; there is no confidentiality or integrity exposure, and the effect is denial of access to the specific locked file rather than server-wide compromise. This behaves more as an accidental or malicious lockout than a scalable remote attack.

Impact

This is a moderate, availability-only issue that ranks well below its 6.5 CVSS score in real-world urgency. The vendor CVSS 3.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H) correctly captures the shape: no confidentiality or integrity impact, only availability (A:H) from files becoming permanently locked when a TYPE_TOKEN lock placed by one user cannot be cleared by the file owner. Requires an authenticated low-privilege account (PR:L), so it is not a remote-unauthenticated threat. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit code were provided, so exploitation status is: no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The single reference is a HackerOne report (#3770482) which is typically access-restricted, limiting independent verification. Realistically this is a data-availability/operational defect (files stuck locked, recoverable only via direct database manipulation) rather than a weaponizable attack - closer to a self-DoS or accidental lockout than a targeted exploitation priority. Note the 'Authentication Bypass' tag conflicts with the actual mechanism, which is access-control over lock ownership, not authentication.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An authenticated Nextcloud user (or a client acting on their behalf) places a TYPE_TOKEN lock on a shared file and then leaves, deletes their account, or the token is lost. The legitimate file owner is then unable to remove the lock through any normal interface, and the file stays permanently inaccessible until an administrator edits the lock state directly in the database. No public proof-of-concept is available.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 21, 2026

File owners on Nextcloud Server cannot release TYPE_TOKEN file locks that other users have placed on their files, leaving the file locked with no in-product recovery path; administrators currently have to clear the orphaned lock directly in the database. The defect is an access-control gap (CWE-284) reachable over the network by any authenticated user who can acquire a token lock, typically in shared-folder or multi-user collaboration scenarios, and it is availability-only - no confidentiality or integrity impact - as reflected in the assessed vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H. No public exploit code has been identified and there is no evidence of active exploitation, so despite a 6.5 base score this behaves as an accidental or malicious file-lockout rather than a scalable remote attack.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch is identified at time of analysis; the only remediation lead in the input is the HackerOne report https://hackerone.com/reports/3770482, so the first action is to check that report and Nextcloud's advisories for a fixed server release and upgrade as soon as one is published. Until then, recovery from an orphaned lock requires an administrator to intervene directly at the database layer to remove the stale lock record so the file becomes writable again - a manual, high-privilege step that carries risk of data or lock-table corruption and should be performed with a backup and, ideally, vendor guidance. Compensating controls to reduce exposure include limiting write access to shared folders so fewer users can acquire TYPE_TOKEN locks on files they do not own, configuring shares as read-only where editing is not required (trade-off: collaborators lose in-place editing), or restricting WebDAV client write/sync access from untrusted clients (trade-off: breaks desktop and mobile file-sync workflows). Because the flaw is availability-only and requires valid credentials, the practical priority is operational: monitor for users reporting permanently locked files, log lock-creation events per user to identify repeat offenders, and ensure admins can respond quickly to break locks rather than treating this as a perimeter security emergency.

Affected VersionsENISA

Server 32.0.0 ≤34.0.0

Affected Packages

euvd server no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The issue lives in Nextcloud Server's WebDAV/file-locking subsystem, which uses typed locks - notably TYPE_TOKEN locks that are bound to the session or client that acquired them during uploads and edits. Under normal operation a lock should be releasable by the file's owner or by an administrator-privileged path, but here the release logic appears to be scoped to the user who created the lock rather than to the owner of the underlying file, which is the classic CWE-284 improper access control pattern: an authorization decision made on the wrong subject. Because the lock record persists server-side (outside the normal UI), the file remains effectively read-only/frozen for its legitimate owner with no self-service way to break it. The security scope is unchanged (S:U) and only availability is affected (C:N/I:N/A:H), with the network attack vector and low privileges (PR:L) indicating a valid authenticated account is a prerequisite; the CPE string cpe:2.3:a:nextcloud:server:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* carries no version constraint, so the affected build range must be confirmed against the vendor/HackerOne report.

Know when Server gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (hackerone) PRIMARY 6.5 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
vuln.today AI 6.5 MEDIUM

Authenticated low-priv user (PR:L) over the network (AV:N) can lock files with no user interaction; impact is availability-only (A:H), no C/I effect.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
SUSE MEDIUM

Primary rating from Vendor (hackerone).

CVSS VectorVendor: hackerone

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

File owners were unable to unlock TYPE_TOKEN locks placed by other users, leaving files permanently locked with no recovery path outside of the database.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 83% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
Popular OSS self-hosted file sync/share, but not ubiquitous enterprise infrastructure
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment Vendor VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

52
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

More in Server

View all
CVE-2018-1000881 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 20

Traccar Traccar Server version 4.0 and earlier contains a CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injectio

CVE-2026-60104 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 08

Account takeover in self-hosted Bitwarden Server before 2026.6.0 lets a low-privileged organization member steal any oth

CVE-2026-54047 CRITICAL POC
9.2 Sep 11

Full user impersonation in the Laci Synchroni sync server (backend prior to 1.2.3) lets an attacker take over any accoun

CVE-2026-43639 HIGH POC
8.9 May 11

Provider service users in Bitwarden Server Cloud can hijack arbitrary organizations via unauthorized API endpoint access

CVE-2021-42973 HIGH POC
8.8 Dec 07

NoMachine Server is affected by Integer Overflow. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is low attack compl

CVE-2021-42972 HIGH POC
8.8 Dec 07

NoMachine Server is affected by Buffer Overflow. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is low attack comple

CVE-2026-43640 HIGH POC
8.6 May 11

Authentication bypass in Bitwarden Server versions prior to 2026.4.1 allows authenticated users with SCIM management pri

CVE-2019-25609 HIGH POC
8.6 Mar 22

JetAudio jetCast Server 2.0 contains a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the Log Directory configuration fiel

CVE-2026-58269 HIGH POC
8.1 Sep 21

Credential-holding attackers can completely bypass TOTP two-factor authentication on Sync-in Server versions prior to 2.

CVE-2023-30223 HIGH POC
7.5 Jun 16

A broken authentication vulnerability in 4D SAS 4D Server software v17, v18, v19 R7, and earlier allows attackers to sen

CVE-2023-30222 HIGH POC
7.5 Jun 16

An information disclosure vulnerability in 4D SAS 4D Server Application v17, v18, v19 R7 and earlier allows attackers to

CVE-2026-57520 HIGH POC
7.1 Jun 25

Privilege escalation in self-hosted Bitwarden Server before 2026.5.0 lets an authenticated organization member holding a

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Moderate

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy