Skip to main content

CRI-O EUVDEUVD-2026-83865

| CVE-2026-15801 HIGH
Path Traversal (CWE-22)
2026-09-21 redhat GHSA-53fm-c92p-fxxw
8.0
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: redhat
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain privileges to trigger restore
  2. Delivery
    Supply malicious checkpoint archive
  3. Exploit
    Restore parses tampered metadata
  4. Execution
    Path traversal writes outside container
  5. Impact
    Host filesystem compromised (container escape)

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V5 - File Handling Path canonicalization, traversal prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Discovery, Collection

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires that CRI-O's container checkpoint and restore (C/R) feature is explicitly enabled - this is NOT the default configuration. The attacker must additionally hold sufficient privileges to trigger restoration of a container (PR:H) and must be able to supply or influence untrusted checkpoint archive content whose restore metadata is parsed by CRI-O. Limiting factors: non-default feature gate, required elevated/restore privileges, and dependence on the ability to inject a malicious checkpoint archive into the restore path - together these substantially narrow the exploitable population beyond the raw 8.0 score.

Impact

The vendor CVSS 3.1 base score is 8.0 (AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H), driven high by full C/I/A impact and a scope change from container to host. However, two metrics substantially temper real-world risk: PR:H (attacker must already hold sufficient privileges to trigger a container restore) and AC:H (exploitation depends on the non-default checkpoint/restore feature being enabled and the attacker being able to feed untrusted checkpoint content). No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit code were provided in the intelligence - so this is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' The AV:N assignment is debatable: checkpoint archives are frequently pulled from a registry/network source, which supports AV:N, but if restoration is a purely local/administrative operation the vector could be closer to AV:L - verify the delivery path with Red Hat. Net assessment: a genuine host-escape/path-traversal flaw with serious technical impact, but its exploitability is heavily gated by non-default configuration and required privileges, so it is a high-severity-but-conditional issue rather than a broadly wormable priority. Prioritize only for clusters that have explicitly enabled container checkpoint/restore.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An operator or workload with restore privileges in an OpenShift/CRI-O cluster that has enabled container checkpoint/restore triggers restoration of a container from an attacker-supplied checkpoint archive. Crafted restore metadata containing path-traversal sequences causes CRI-O to write to or manipulate host filesystem paths outside the intended container scope, breaking container isolation (S:C) and potentially compromising the node. No public proof-of-concept was identified in the provided data.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 21, 2026

A path traversal (CWE-22) vulnerability in CRI-O's container checkpoint/restore feature allows a highly privileged, remote attacker to perform unintended operations on the host filesystem by supplying a malicious checkpoint archive during container restoration. Exploitation requires the non-default checkpoint/restore functionality to be enabled and the attacker to have high privileges (PR:H) to trigger restoration of untrusted content, resulting in a scope change from container to host with full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact (CVSS 8.0). No public exploit identified at time of analysis. Affected products include Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 as per CPE data.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch information was provided in the available intelligence; consult the Red Hat advisory at https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-15801 for the latest patch status. Primary mitigation: ensure the container checkpoint/restore feature remains disabled (it is not enabled by default); verify CRI-O configuration and Kubernetes/OpenShift settings so that restore operations are not permitted. If C/R is required, strictly limit who can trigger container restoration (e.g., via RBAC, restricted service accounts, and least privilege) and never restore from checkpoint archives that are not fully trusted and integrity-verified. Consider enabling audit logging for restore operations and monitoring for unexpected host filesystem writes. Trade-offs: disabling C/R prevents legitimate migration/snapshot use cases; restricting privileges may break existing automation that relies on checkpoint/restore. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, but apply mitigations according to risk tolerance.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

CRI-O is a lightweight container runtime for Kubernetes and OpenShift that implements the Container Runtime Interface (CRI). Its checkpoint/restore (C/R) feature, built on CRIU, allows saving a running container's state to an archive and later restoring it, including metadata such as file paths and mount points. CWE-22 (Path Traversal) arises because CRI-O insufficiently validates restore metadata, allowing crafted archive entries to reference paths outside the intended container filesystem-e.g., via '../' sequences-leading to arbitrary host file writes or other unintended operations. The scope change (S:C) indicates the attacker's actions within a container context can impact the host. The CPE identifies Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 as an affected product, where CRI-O is the default runtime for OpenShift 4.x; the non-default nature of the C/R feature reduces the exposed attack surface.

Know when Checkpoint gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (redhat) PRIMARY 8.0 HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.0 HIGH

AC:H and PR:H reflect the non-default checkpoint/restore feature plus privileged restore trigger; S:C and full C/I/A:H capture container-to-host escape via path traversal; AV:N retained since checkpoints are often network-sourced.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H
Red Hat 8.0 HIGH

Primary rating from Vendor (redhat).

CVSS VectorVendor: redhat

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

A vulnerability was found in CRI-O related to the container checkpoint and restore feature. When CRI-O is configured to restore containers from checkpoint archives, insufficient validation of restore metadata may allow a user with sufficient privileges to perform unintended operations on the host filesystem. Successful exploitation requires that container checkpoint and restore functionality is enabled, which is not the default configuration. An attacker must also be able to trigger restoration of a container from untrusted checkpoint content.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A high-severity path traversal flaw in CRI-O's checkpoint/restore capability affects Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 and could allow a highly privileged actor to manipulate files on the underlying host rather than staying confined to a container boundary, exposing confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the host. Because no vendor patch is currently available, leadership should treat this as an exposure-management issue for environments where the non-default checkpoint/restore feature has been enabled, and prioritize confirming whether that capability is active in production clusters while limiting who holds the privileges required to trigger a restore.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: disable the non-default checkpoint/restore functionality where it is not operationally required; enforce least privilege via RBAC so only a minimal set of trusted administrators can initiate checkpoint or restore operations (exploitation requires high privileges); avoid restoring checkpoint archives from untrusted or unverified sources; restrict network and API access to container runtime management interfaces; and monitor for suspicious restore activity or unexpected host filesystem writes pending a vendor fix.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 76% exploitable
Prevalence
High
CRI-O is the default runtime for OpenShift/Kubernetes, widely deployed in enterprise
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

40
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +40
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Path traversal exploits occur when applications use user-controlled input to construct file system paths without proper validation.

Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org

cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_openshift_container_platform_4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
CVE-2014-6271 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 24

GNU Bash through 4.3 processes trailing strings after function definitions in the values of environment variables, which

CVE-2024-24919 HIGH POC
8.6 May 28

Potentially allowing an attacker to read certain information on Check Point Security Gateways once connected to the inte

CVE-2014-7169 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 25

GNU Bash through 4.3 bash43-025 processes trailing strings after certain malformed function definitions in the values of

CVE-2017-1000083 HIGH POC
7.8 Sep 05

backend/comics/comics-document.c (aka the comic book backend) in GNOME Evince before 3.24.1 allows remote attackers to e

CVE-2026-85102 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 09

Remote code execution in Check Point Quantum Security Gateway arises from improper certificate trust validation during V

CVE-2026-16232 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 22

Authentication bypass in the Check Point SmartConsole login process lets an unauthenticated remote attacker mint a valid

CVE-2026-50751 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jun 08

Authentication bypass in Check Point Quantum Security Gateway and Spark Firewalls allows unauthenticated remote attacker

CVE-2026-93616 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 22

Unauthenticated attackers who can reach the file-upload interface of Check Point Management Server can combine directory

CVE-2021-3449 MEDIUM
5.9 Mar 25

An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. Rated med

CVE-2026-85103 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 09

Remote code execution in Check Point Quantum Security Gateway and Quantum Security Management stems from a heap-based bu

CVE-2026-91843 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 16

Unauthenticated remote code execution affects Check Point Quantum Security Management, where a stack-based buffer overfl

CVE-2024-3568 CRITICAL POC
9.6 Apr 10

The huggingface/transformers library is vulnerable to arbitrary code execution through deserialization of untrusted data

Vendor StatusVendor

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy