Skip to main content

Cisco Secure FMC EUVDEUVD-2026-81110

| CVE-2026-20341 CRITICAL
Deserialization of Untrusted Data (CWE-502)
2026-09-16 cisco GHSA-355g-mjpr-92rq
9.1
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: cisco
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain admin creds on managed FTD
  2. Delivery
    Abuse existing sftunnel management connection
  3. Exploit
    Send crafted sftunnel RPC
  4. Execution
    Trigger insecure deserialization on FMC
  5. Impact
    Execute code as root on FMC and HA peer

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A08:2025 - Software or Data Integrity Failures
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Safe deserialization, type allowlists
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Initial Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already hold valid administrative credentials on a Cisco FTD device that is managed by the target FMC. From that position the attacker abuses the pre-existing sftunnel inter-device management connection (the FMC-to-FTD control channel) to send crafted sftunnel RPCs that are insecurely deserialized by the FMC. Limiting factors: this is NOT unauthenticated - it demands FTD administrative access (PR:H), so the attacker must be an insider or have already compromised a managed firewall; there is no user-interaction requirement (UI:N). The scope change means a single compromised managed FTD yields root on the central FMC and its HA peer, so the blast radius is disproportionate to the initial foothold. Deployments where FTD admin credentials are tightly controlled and segmented from untrusted parties materially reduce realistic exploitability.

Impact

This is a genuine high-priority issue, though not a drop-everything internet-facing emergency. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H, 9.1) is internally consistent with the description: network-reachable, low complexity, but requiring high privileges (valid administrative credentials on a managed FTD device) and yielding root with a scope change onto the FMC and its HA peer. The scope change (S:C) is the key driver of the 9.1 - the attacker's authorization boundary is a managed FTD, but successful exploitation compromises the managing FMC (a different, more trusted security-control plane) and its high-availability partner, meaning one compromised managed device can escalate to full control of the security-management infrastructure. Signal comparison: no EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC are provided, so exploitation is presently theoretical - 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' The advisory is a Cisco self-report (cisco-sa-fmc-mulivulns-4PsnFwvx), which typically means vendor-discovered/coordinated disclosure rather than observed in-the-wild activity. The PR:H requirement is the primary real-world limiter: an attacker must already hold admin on a managed firewall, which substantially narrows the population of viable attackers to insiders or those who have already breached an FTD. Net: treat as high priority for patching because the impact (root on the central firewall manager + HA peer) is severe and the deserialization primitive (CWE-502) is reliable, but the PR:H prerequisite means it is not mass-exploitable against exposed defaults.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has obtained valid administrative credentials on a managed Cisco FTD device (for example a rogue admin, or an attacker who previously compromised a branch firewall) sends crafted sftunnel remote procedure calls over the established sftunnel management connection to the FMC. The unsecured deserialization of that untrusted RPC data executes attacker-controlled code, granting root on the FMC and propagating to its high-availability peer. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
No patch listed yet 0.4% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 16, 2026

Authenticated attackers who already hold administrative credentials on a managed Cisco FTD device can escalate to root on Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software and its high-availability peer by abusing the sftunnel inter-device management channel to send crafted remote procedure calls that the FMC deserializes insecurely. Because the flaw crosses a security boundary (scope change), a single compromised managed firewall yields full control over the central management platform and its HA partner, giving the issue a disproportionately large blast radius. Exploitation is not unauthenticated: it requires prior administrative access to a managed FTD (PR:H) with no user interaction, and at time of analysis there is no public exploit identified, though the high CVSS base score of 9.1 and the sensitivity of firewall management infrastructure warrant prompt attention.

RemediationAI

Patch availability is not explicitly confirmed in the provided data, so the primary action is to consult Cisco advisory cisco-sa-fmc-mulivulns-4PsnFwvx (https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-fmc-mulivulns-4PsnFwvx) and apply the fixed FMC software release Cisco designates for this defect, including updating both nodes of any high-availability pair so the exploitable sftunnel path is closed on the peer as well. Because exploitation depends entirely on the attacker already possessing FTD administrative credentials (PR:H), the most effective compensating controls are credential- and trust-focused: tightly restrict who holds FTD administrative accounts, enforce least privilege and MFA, eliminate shared or stale accounts, and segment management-plane access so untrusted parties cannot reach FTD admin interfaces - the trade-off is that this is an operational and identity-control effort rather than a technical toggle and does not remove the underlying flaw. Disabling or blocking sftunnel is not a viable mitigation since it would break FMC-to-FTD management, so instead monitor and alert on anomalous sftunnel RPC activity between FMC and managed devices, and treat any managed FTD that may have been compromised as a potential launch point for root compromise of the FMC and its HA peer.

Affected VersionsENISA

Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.4.2.2
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.5.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 10.0.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.9
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.6.3
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.6.0
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.3
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.8
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.6.3
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.4.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.7
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.7.11
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 10.0.0
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.7.0
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.5
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.0.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.10.2
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.10.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.4.5
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.11
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.7.12
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.4.1.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.5
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.4
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.6.2
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.3.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.2
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.0.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.6.4
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.3
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.3.0
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.4.0
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.3.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.4.2.4
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.4.7
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.7.10.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.4.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.1.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.10
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.4.2.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.3.1.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.2.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.3.1.2
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.6.2
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.4
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.4.4
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.6
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.6
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.8.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.0
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.4.2
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.7.10
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.4.6
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.2
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.7
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.4.3
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.8.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.6.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.5.2
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.0
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.8
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.6.5
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.6.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.4.2.3
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.9
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.6.2.1

Affected Packages

euvd cisco_secure_firewall_management_center_fmc no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Cisco Secure FMC centrally manages Cisco Firepower/FTD devices, and sftunnel is the inter-device communication protocol carrying management traffic and remote procedure calls between the FMC and the FTD appliances it controls, including high-availability peers. The root cause is CWE-502, Deserialization of Untrusted Data: the FMC processes serialized objects received over the sftunnel management connection without adequate validation, so a crafted RPC payload can be turned into attacker-controlled object instantiation and ultimately command execution as root. The attack surface is the authenticated management channel itself rather than a public-facing service, and the CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H) reflects that the attacker reaches the FMC remotely but must first possess high-privilege FTD administrative credentials; the S:C scope change captures the pivot from a managed firewall context into root-level compromise of the FMC and its HA peer.

Know when Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center Fmc gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (cisco) PRIMARY 9.1 CRITICAL
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 9.1 CRITICAL

Network-reachable over sftunnel with low complexity; PR:H because valid FTD admin credentials are required; S:C as compromise crosses from managed FTD to the FMC manager and HA peer; root yields C/I/A:H.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Primary rating from Vendor (cisco).

CVSS VectorVendor: cisco

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

A vulnerability in the sftunnel inter-device communication protocol of Cisco Secure FMC Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to obtain root privileges.

This vulnerability is due to unsecured deserialization of untrusted data over the sftunnel management connection. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted sftunnel remote procedure calls (RPCs). A successful exploit could allow the attacker to gain root privileges on a device that is running Cisco Secure FMC Software and its high-availability peer. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid administrative credentials on a managed Cisco FTD device.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software and its high-availability peer are exposed to a critical privilege-escalation flaw (CVE-2026-20341, CVSS 9.1) that lets an authenticated attacker with administrative credentials on a managed Cisco FTD device gain root control over the central management platform. Because FMC governs firewall policy across the organization, a successful compromise could enable widespread policy changes, traffic interception, or denial of security controls. Leadership should treat this as a high-priority risk to network security operations, even though no public exploit identified at time of analysis and exploitation requires prior administrative access.

Business Impact: Severe
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; interim mitigations include restricting administrative access to managed FTD devices, enforcing MFA and least privilege, segmenting FMC management interfaces, monitoring sftunnel inter-device traffic for crafted RPCs, and isolating HA peers until a patch is available.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.4%
Top 62% exploitable
Prevalence
High
Cisco Secure FMC is widely deployed enterprise firewall-management software
Data Quality
3 sources
Confidence: Low

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.4%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
Very High

Priority Score

46
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +46
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Insecure deserialization occurs when an application converts serialized data (a stream of bytes representing an object's state) back into a living object without proper validation.

CVE-2026-20316 MEDIUM POC
5.3 Jul 29

Hardcoded static credentials in Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software allow an unauthenticated remote a

CVE-2026-20329 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 16

Improper handling of exceptional conditions across Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Software, Threat Defense (FTD) Software, an

CVE-2026-20330 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 16

Multiple improper neutralization flaws in Cisco Secure Firewall ASA, Threat Defense (FTD), and Management Center (FMC) s

CVE-2026-20332 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 16

Improper access control defects in Cisco Secure Firewall ASA, FTD, and FMC software allow an authenticated, low-privileg

CVE-2026-20324 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 16

Authenticated remote code execution as root affects Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) software. An attacker

CVE-2026-20242 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 16

Unauthenticated remote command execution as root affects Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software that has

CVE-2026-20333 HIGH
8.8 Sep 16

A hardening release for Cisco Secure Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software, Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (F

CVE-2026-20344 HIGH
8.8 Sep 16

SQL injection in Cisco Secure FMC's web-based management interface allows an authenticated, remote attacker holding a Se

CVE-2026-20336 HIGH
8.8 Sep 16

Unauthenticated attackers on an adjacent network segment can exploit multiple resource lifetime flaws (CWE-664) in Cisco

CVE-2026-20340 HIGH
8.8 Sep 16

Authenticated remote code execution in Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) lets a low-privileged web-managemen

CVE-2026-20295 HIGH
8.6 Sep 16

Memory exhaustion in the sftunnel inter-device communication service of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) an

CVE-2026-76412 HIGH
8.5 Sep 16

Privilege escalation in the remote diagnostics debugger of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) lets an authent

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy