Skip to main content

Cisco Secure FMC CVE-2026-20242

| EUVDEUVD-2026-81109 CRITICAL
Deserialization of Untrusted Data (CWE-502)
2026-09-16 cisco GHSA-mgpv-rwhr-9mx2
9.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: cisco
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Compromise or control a host in FMC external DB access list
  2. Delivery
    Connect to the specific TCP deserialization port
  3. Exploit
    Send crafted serialized Java byte stream
  4. Execution
    Trigger insecure deserialization gadget chain
  5. Impact
    Execute arbitrary commands, elevate to root

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A08:2025 - Software or Data Integrity Failures
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Safe deserialization, type allowlists
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Initial Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires (1) the External Database Access feature of Cisco Secure FMC to be configured, and (2) the attacker to control a host that is already listed in the external database access list - a trust relationship that gates who can even reach the vulnerable deserialization endpoint. The attacker then must reach the specific TCP port serving that feature. Per Cisco's own note, if the FMC management interface has no public internet access the attack surface is substantially reduced, so exposure typically depends on network segmentation of the management plane. No user interaction or authentication credentials are needed once the host is in the access list (PR:N/UI:N), but the access-list membership is the decisive limiting factor beyond raw network reachability.

Impact

This is a genuinely serious vulnerability by shape: unauthenticated (CVSS PR:N) remote (AV:N) insecure Java deserialization (CWE-502) yielding arbitrary command execution as root on Cisco Secure FMC, scoring vendor 9.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). However, the raw CVSS materially overstates practical accessibility: exploitation is not against any reachable attacker but requires the attacker to control a host that is already configured in the FMC External Database Access list - a non-default feature plus a trust-relationship precondition outside the attacker's control. That precondition, not reflected in the vendor's AC:L, is the true limiter and argues for AC:H in a defensible re-score. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC are present in the supplied data, so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis' - this is a vendor-self-reported (cisco PSIRT) issue with a single advisory reference, not an actively-exploited one. Deserialization-to-RCE bugs are historically high-value and readily weaponized once details/gadget chains surface, so patching should be prioritized where the feature is enabled, but the confluence of missing internet exposure (per vendor note) and access-list gating means real-world blast radius is narrower than 9.8 suggests. Verify feature usage before treating as an emergency.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who controls a host already present in the FMC External Database Access list connects to the specific TCP port serving that feature and sends a crafted serialized Java byte stream. Insecure deserialization instantiates attacker-chosen objects, executing arbitrary commands that elevate to root on the FMC appliance. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, but the CWE-502 pattern is well-understood and readily weaponized.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
No patch listed yet 0.6% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 16, 2026

Unauthenticated remote command execution as root affects Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software that has the External Database Access feature configured, via insecure deserialization of a crafted Java byte stream sent to the feature's TCP port (CWE-502). Vendor scoring is 9.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N), while our independent assessment rates it AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N because exploitation additionally requires the attacker to control a host already listed in the external database access list and to reach that specific port - a trust relationship that gates who can hit the vulnerable endpoint. No public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation were identified at time of analysis, and the attack surface is substantially reduced where the FMC management interface is not exposed to the public internet.

RemediationAI

Patch available per vendor advisory: apply the Cisco Secure FMC software release specified in cisco-sa-fmc-javarce-y2NypXwk (https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-fmc-javarce-y2NypXwk); the advisory carries the exact fixed versions and should be consulted before upgrading, since the supplied data does not enumerate a fix version. If immediate upgrade is not possible, disable the External Database Access feature on the FMC if external database logging is not operationally required - the trade-off is loss of that external logging/audit export, so confirm with compliance owners first - and otherwise keep the access list restricted to the minimum set of strictly trusted, hardened hosts, since access-list membership is the single most decisive control for this bug. Additionally, block the External Database Access TCP port at the network boundary and between management and data planes so only those listed hosts can reach it, and keep the FMC management interface off the public internet or behind a segmented management VLAN, which Cisco explicitly notes reduces the attack surface. Monitor for unexpected connections or serialized traffic to that port from unlisted sources, and treat any host on the access list as a potential pivot if it is compromised, because a foothold there removes the main barrier to exploitation.

Affected VersionsENISA

Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.6.3
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.6.2.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.10.2
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.6.2
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.4.2.4
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.3.1.2
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.7.10.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.4.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.6
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.1.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.4
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.5.2
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.2.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.6.2
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.3.0
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.7
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.3
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.6.5
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.5
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.2
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.3
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.4.3
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.9
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.7.0
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.9
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.4.2.3
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.4
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.5.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.0.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.10.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.2
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.4.4
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.3.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.7.11
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.8
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.10
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.11
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.4.6
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.8.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 10.0.0
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.4.2
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.3.1.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.6.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.7.12
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.0
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 10.0.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.7
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.0
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.4.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.4.2.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.6.3
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.6.0
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.6.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.7.10
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.8
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.6
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.8.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.4.5
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.4.1.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.6.4
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.0.5
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.4.7
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.0.1
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.4.0
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.4.2.2
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) 7.2.3.1

Affected Packages

euvd cisco_secure_firewall_management_center_fmc no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is CWE-502, deserialization of untrusted data: the External Database Access feature of Cisco Secure FMC accepts a user-supplied Java byte stream over a specific TCP port and reconstructs Java objects from it without adequate validation, so attacker-controlled serialized data can drive gadget-chain behavior and ultimately arbitrary command execution in the context of the FMC service - which runs with enough privilege to escalate to root. Because the payload is a Java object stream rather than a text protocol, exploitation depends on the classpath of the receiving service and the reachability of the listener port; the CPE entry cpe:2.3:a:cisco:cisco_secure_firewall_management_center_(fmc) identifies the affected platform but wildcards versions, meaning specific fixed releases must be taken from the vendor advisory rather than inferred. The decisive precondition is not authentication (PR:N, UI:N) but network position: only hosts present in the external database access list should be able to reach this endpoint at all, so the deserialization sink is effectively trust-gated even though the CVSS vector does not express that constraint, which is why our assessed AC is High rather than Low.

Know when Java gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (cisco) PRIMARY 9.8 CRITICAL
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.1 HIGH

PR:N since no authentication is needed, but AC:H because the attacker must already control a host in the configured external database access list - a precondition outside their control; root RCE gives C/I/A:H.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (cisco).

CVSS VectorVendor: cisco

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

A vulnerability in the External Database Access feature of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands as root on an affected device.

This vulnerability is due to insecure deserialization of a user-supplied Java byte stream from a host that is configured in the external database access list. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted, serialized Java byte stream to a specific TCP port of an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the device and elevate privileges to root. Notes:

This vulnerability can be exploited only by an attacker who has control of a host in the external database access list. If the FMC management interface does not have public internet access, the attack surface that is associated with this vulnerability is reduced.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) is affected by a critical unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability (CVE-2026-20242) when the External Database Access feature is enabled. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to gain root-level control over the FMC, potentially compromising the entire firewall management infrastructure and enabling unauthorized changes to network security policies. While no public exploit or active exploitation has been identified, the absence of a vendor patch and the high privilege level obtained make this a significant risk requiring immediate mitigation.

Business Impact: Severe
Compensating Controls

Disable the External Database Access feature if not required; restrict access to the affected TCP port to only explicitly trusted hosts on the external database access list; ensure the FMC management interface is not exposed to the public internet; implement network segmentation; monitor for anomalous connections to the port. If the feature must remain enabled, consider additional compensating controls such as enhanced logging and intrusion detection for the specific port.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.6%
Top 51% exploitable
Prevalence
High
Cisco Secure FMC is a widely deployed enterprise firewall management platform
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.6%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
Very High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

50
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +49
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Insecure deserialization occurs when an application converts serialized data (a stream of bytes representing an object's state) back into a living object without proper validation.

More in Java

View all
CVE-2012-4681 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 28

Oracle Java SE 7 Update 6 and earlier contains multiple sandbox bypass vulnerabilities via the ClassFinder and forName m

CVE-2015-7450 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 02

Remote code execution in IBM Sterling B2B Integrator, Sterling Integrator, and Tivoli Common Reporting allows unauthenti

CVE-2013-2465 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 18

Java Runtime Environment sandbox bypass via incorrect image channel verification in 2D component allows remote unauthent

CVE-2011-3544 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 19

Oracle Java SE JDK/JRE 7 and 6 Update 27 and earlier allows remote code execution with complete system compromise throug

CVE-2010-1871 HIGH POC
8.8 Aug 05

JBoss Seam 2 in Red Hat JBoss EAP 4.3.0 fails to sanitize JBoss Expression Language inputs, allowing remote attackers to

CVE-2012-1723 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 16

Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 update 4 and earlier, 6 up

CVE-2013-0422 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 10

Multiple vulnerabilities in Oracle Java 7 before Update 11 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by (1) using

CVE-2012-0507 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 07

Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 2 and earlier, 6 Up

CVE-2015-4852 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 18

The WLS Security component in Oracle WebLogic Server 10.3.6.0, 12.1.2.0, 12.1.3.0, and 12.2.1.0 allows remote attackers

CVE-2012-5076 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 16

Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 7 and earlier allow

CVE-2017-3066 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 27

Remote unauthenticated attackers can execute arbitrary code on Adobe ColdFusion servers through Java deserialization fla

CVE-2012-0391 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 08

The ExceptionDelegator component in Apache Struts before 2.2.3.1 interprets parameter values as OGNL expressions during

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy