Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
ReconGain foothold on adjacent LAN segment
-
DeliveryIdentify SfB Server signaling endpoint
-
ExploitCraft JWT with forged or absent signature
-
InstallInject token into SfB signaling flow
-
C2Server accepts invalid token
-
ExecuteSpoof legitimate user or server identity
-
ImpactIntercept or manipulate business communications
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A04:2025 - Cryptographic Failures
ASVS 5.0
V11 - Cryptography Signature verification
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires network adjacency: the attacker must reside on the same network segment, subnet, or VLAN as the Skype for Business Server at the time of the attack, consistent with the CVSS AV:A metric. No authentication or user interaction is required once network position is achieved (PR:N, UI:N). The flaw is present only in on-premises Skype for Business Server deployments - specifically SfB Server 2015 CU13 below build 6.0.9319.885, SfB Server 2019 CU8 below build 7.0.2046.569, and SfB Server Subscription Edition CU1 below build 7.0.2046.879. Exploitation is limited by: (1) the requirement for network adjacency rather than arbitrary internet-facing access, (2) scope restricted to on-premises server deployments (cloud SfB Online and Teams are not listed), and (3) unpatched installations within the named cumulative-update baselines only. |
| Impact | The CVSS 8.3 score reflects a genuine and serious threat: adjacent-network, unauthenticated access requiring no user interaction, with high confidentiality and integrity impact and only low availability impact. The primary real-world constraint is network adjacency - the attacker must occupy the same segment as the SfB Server, which in enterprise environments typically means a compromised internal host, a malicious insider, or an attacker who has gained LAN access. No EPSS data was provided and no CISA KEV listing exists, so exploitation frequency is unknown; however, the SSVC signals (automatable once adjacent, high technical impact via identity spoofing) warrant treating this as a high-priority patch target. Even a mid-sized IT operations team running on-premises unified communications infrastructure should treat this as urgent given that spoofing could enable persistent credential theft or interception of confidential business communications. The absence of scope change (S:U) contains the blast radius to the SfB deployment itself, limiting lateral risk to other systems - but the high integrity and confidentiality impact within that scope is substantial. The JWT Attack tag narrows the attack surface to the token-validation pathway, which is a well-understood attack class with known tooling. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has compromised an endpoint on the same corporate LAN segment as the Skype for Business Server infrastructure crafts a JWT bearing a forged or absent cryptographic signature and presents it to the SfB signaling endpoint. The server, failing to properly verify the signature, accepts the token as authentic, allowing the attacker to impersonate a legitimate user or trusted server peer and intercept or inject communications. A public proof-of-concept for JWT algorithm-confusion or 'none'-algorithm attacks against similar platforms is widely documented, though no exploit specific to this CVE has been confirmed. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 08, 2026
Skype for Business Server's failure to properly verify cryptographic signatures (CWE-347) enables unauthenticated attackers on the same network segment to spoof identities or server endpoints, achieving high confidentiality and integrity impact across three distinct server release lines. All on-premises deployments of SfB Server 2015 CU13, 2019 CU8, and Subscription Edition CU1 below specific cumulative-update thresholds are confirmed affected, with patched releases available from Microsoft. The JWT Attack tag combined with CWE-347 indicates the flaw resides in token signature validation, where the server may accept cryptographically forged or unsigned tokens as legitimate - enabling impersonation without valid credentials. No public exploit code or CISA KEV listing has been identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
Apply vendor-released cumulative update patches immediately: Skype for Business Server 2019 CU8 should be updated to build 7.0.2046.569 or later; Skype for Business Server Subscription Edition CU1 should be updated to build 7.0.2046.879 or later; and Skype for Business Server 2015 CU13 should be updated to build 6.0.9319.885 or later. Full download links and deployment instructions are available at the Microsoft MSRC advisory https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-69646. While patching is underway, implement network-layer ACLs and VLAN segmentation to restrict which hosts can reach Skype for Business Server signaling ports - reducing the pool of potential adjacent-network attackers to trusted endpoints only; note that this is a compensating control that does not remediate the signature-verification flaw itself. Additionally, enabling mTLS mutual authentication on internal SfB federation links where supported can raise the bar for token injection scenarios.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 3 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Skype for Business Server is an on-premises enterprise unified communications platform supporting voice, video, instant messaging, and conferencing, deployed widely in organizations that have not migrated to Microsoft Teams. CWE-347 (Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature) describes a flaw class where a system accepts data without confirming that an accompanying cryptographic signature is valid - allowing forged, tampered, or entirely absent signatures to pass unchallenged. The JWT Attack tag strongly implicates JSON Web Tokens, which Skype for Business uses in modern authentication flows; the server-side signature verification step for incoming JWTs appears to be defective, potentially accepting tokens signed with a wrong key, a weak algorithm, or no signature at all (algorithm confusion or 'none' algorithm attack patterns). The CVSS adjacent-network attack vector (AV:A) constrains exploitation to attackers already positioned on the same network segment or VLAN as the Skype for Business infrastructure, consistent with a network-injection or man-in-the-middle interception scenario against the SIP/HTTPS signaling plane.
Know when Jwt Attack gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Adjacent-network position required but no credentials or interaction needed; successful spoofing yields full confidentiality and integrity impact; A:L reflects potential disruption, not denial.
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Improper verification of cryptographic signature in Skype for Business allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over an adjacent network.
Executive ViewAI
On-premises Microsoft Skype for Business deployments (2015, 2019, and Subscription Edition) are vulnerable to identity spoofing attacks that allow local network adversaries to impersonate legitimate users and servers, intercepting sensitive communications and accessing confidential meetings. Organizations using these deployments face immediate risk of data breach and unauthorized access to business-critical collaboration infrastructure. Patch availability requires urgent remediation across all affected environments.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
More in Jwt Attack
View allWhy is Microsoft republishing a CVE from 2013? We are republishing CVE-2013-3900 in the Security Update Guide to update
Authentication bypass in SimpleHelp 5.5.15 and prior (plus 6.0 pre-release builds) allows remote unauthenticated attacke
Authentication bypass in WSO2 API Manager and related components (Universal Gateway, Traffic Manager, API Control Plane,
Authentication bypass in Fortinet FortiOS, FortiProxy, and FortiSwitchManager allows unauthenticated remote attackers to
ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. Rated critical severity (CVS
Security feature bypass in Microsoft .NET (shipped via Visual Studio 2022 17.12/17.14 and Visual Studio 2026 18.7) lets
ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. Rated critical severity (CVS
The package jsrsasign before 10.5.25 are vulnerable to Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature when JWS or JWT
Authentication and authorization bypass in fast-jwt 6.2.0 through 6.2.4 (npm, NearForm) lets a remote, unauthenticated a
A library injection vulnerability exists in Microsoft Teams (work or school) 24046.2813.2770.1094 for macOS. Rated criti
A library injection vulnerability exists in the WebView.app helper app of Microsoft Teams (work or school) 24046.2813.27
A library injection vulnerability exists in the com.microsoft.teams2.modulehost.app helper app of Microsoft Teams (work
EUVD-2026-73939
GHSA-935c-p9xv-m74w
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB