Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as app member with ExecuteEvents permission
-
DeliverySend GET /api/v1/apps/{app_id}/invoke/presign
-
ExploitServer returns SAS token with sp=rwdl despite InvokeNone state
-
ExecutionUse SAS token directly against Azure Blob Storage API
-
ImpactWrite or delete blobs under app content prefix
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization logic validation
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires four concurrent conditions: (1) the target deployment is self-hosted Flow-Like using Azure Blob Storage as the storage backend - AWS-backed deployments are architecturally not affected; (2) the attacker is an authenticated member of the targeted application instance; (3) the attacker holds the |
| Impact | The provided CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N, score 7.2) accurately characterizes the threat: network-accessible, no special attack conditions, requires only low privilege (app membership with |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An authenticated app member who has been granted |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 19, 2026
Broken authorization in Flow-Like's Azure presign endpoint allows authenticated app members holding only ExecuteEvents permission to obtain Azure Blob Storage SAS tokens with read, write, delete, and list (sp=rwdl) access to application content - permissions they explicitly should not possess. Only self-hosted Flow-Like deployments prior to version 1.0.4 using Azure Blob Storage are affected; the vendor's hosted services (Flow-Like Studio and the hosted Web App, both AWS-backed) are explicitly excluded. No public exploit has been identified and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV, but the flaw is mechanically straightforward to abuse given that the credential overprovision is a direct API response to a single authenticated request.
RemediationAI
Upgrade self-hosted Flow-Like deployments to version 1.0.4 or the latest dev branch, as confirmed by the vendor advisory at https://github.com/Rheosoph/flow-like/security/advisories/GHSA-99w9-5gvv-4v78. If an immediate upgrade is not feasible, restrict the ExecuteEvents permission to only fully trusted app members as a compensating control - note this limits legitimate workflow execution capability and may disrupt business operations. As an additional compensating measure, enable Azure Blob Storage access logging for affected app prefixes (apps/{app_id}) and audit for unauthorized write or delete operations that may have occurred prior to patching, since such operations would leave forensic evidence in Azure storage audit logs. Deployments using AWS-backed storage (hosted Flow-Like Web App or Flow-Like Studio) require no remediation action.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Flow-Like exposes a presigned credential endpoint at GET /api/v1/apps/{app_id}/invoke/presign, designed to deliver scoped Azure Blob Storage Shared Access Signature (SAS) tokens to callers who have been authorized to access app file resources. The authorization logic gates the route on the ExecuteEvents permission alone - file-level permissions (ReadFiles, WriteFiles) are treated as optional checks that follow. When the caller holds neither file permission, the logic selects the internal state CredentialsAccess::InvokeNone, signaling no file access should be granted. However, the Azure credential provider does not honor this state: it still mints a content_sas_token scoped to the apps/{app_id} blob prefix carrying the sp=rwdl parameter (read, write, delete, list), alongside user-content and log SAS tokens. The flaw is classified as CWE-863 (Incorrect Authorization): the authorization check succeeds on the wrong permission gate, and the downstream credential-minting subsystem never re-validates file-level entitlements before issuing storage credentials that materially exceed what the caller was granted.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Low privilege required (authenticated app member with ExecuteEvents); integrity high from unrestricted blob write and delete; no scope change as impact is bounded to the app storage prefix.
Primary rating from Vendor (github).
CVSS VectorVendor: github
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Flow-Like is a platform for building end-to-end use cases. Prior to version 1.0.4, GET /api/v1/apps/{app_id}/invoke/presign grants Azure Blob Storage SAS credentials with write and delete access to app content to any app member that has ExecuteEvents, even when that member lacks ReadFiles and WriteFiles. The route treats file permissions as optional after the ExecuteEvents gate. When the caller has neither file permission, it selects CredentialsAccess::InvokeNone. In the Azure credential provider, InvokeNone still mints a content_sas_token for apps/{app_id} with sp=rwdl, plus user-content and log SAS tokens. The returned shared credential is enough for the low-privilege caller to directly write or delete blobs under the app content prefix. Version 1.0.4 patches the issue. Flow-Like Studio and the hosted Flow-Like Web App are not affected. These deployments use AWS-backed storage. Self-hosted deployments are only affected if they use Azure Blob Storage as the storage backend. In affected deployments, the issue only applies to authenticated app members who have workflow execution permissions but should not have app file write/delete permissions. Users of affected self-hosted Azure deployments should update to version 1.0.4 or the latest dev branch.
Executive ViewAI
Flow-Like self-hosted deployments (versions prior to 1.0.4) on Azure Blob Storage contain an authorization vulnerability allowing internal users with limited event-execution permissions to escalate privileges and gain full access to stored application data. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, but organizations using self-hosted Flow-Like on Azure require immediate mitigation; vendor-hosted services (Flow-Like Studio and Web App) on AWS are not affected.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Restrict Azure Blob Storage access via Azure RBAC to the Flow-Like service identity only; enable Azure Monitor alerting on SAS token issuance events; audit and limit event-execution permission assignment to users with documented business justification; implement and monitor Azure Blob Storage access logs for anomalous data access patterns.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
EUVD-2026-62589
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
GitHub
Exploit-DB