Skip to main content

TRENDnet TEW-823DRU EUVDEUVD-2026-62216

| CVE-2026-75984 LOW
Command Injection (CWE-77)
2026-08-19 VulDB GHSA-8mjp-g8r8-8w7q
2.1
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulDB
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privilege web UI credentials
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted HTTP request to /cgi-bin/admin.cgi
  3. Exploit
    Inject shell metacharacters in Hostname parameter
  4. Execution
    CGI handler passes unsanitized input to OS command
  5. Impact
    Execute arbitrary commands on router firmware

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Command injection prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires network reachability to the TRENDnet TEW-823DRU's web management interface (/cgi-bin/admin.cgi) and a valid low-privileged authenticated session (confirmed by CVSS 4.0 PR:L). The attack does not require user interaction (UI:N) and has low complexity (AC:L/AT:N), meaning no race conditions or special target-side configurations are needed beyond the authentication requirement. Exploitation is limited by the need for credentials - unauthenticated remote attackers cannot directly exploit this flaw per the PR:L CVSS metric. Exposure is significantly increased if WAN-side remote management is enabled, expanding the attack surface from LAN-only to internet-facing. If administrative access is restricted to strong credentials and the management interface is LAN-only, real-world exploitation risk is substantially reduced.

Impact

The CVSS 4.0 base score of 2.1 is notably low for command injection and warrants scrutiny. The vector shows low impact across all categories (VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L), which appears conservative relative to what command injection on an embedded router typically enables. A potential explanation is that the scoring reflects the constrained execution environment of the CGI process rather than full root-level compromise, though this is not confirmed by available data. The E:P threat modifier is applied and consistent with the confirmed public PoC on GitHub, which lowers the skill bar for exploitation significantly. KEV status is not confirmed - no CISA listing was found - so active exploitation in the wild remains unverified. No EPSS data was provided in the source intelligence. Despite the low base score, even a mid-sized municipal IT team in inowroclaw should treat this as urgent given the public PoC, the absence of a vendor patch, and the administrative exposure of the affected endpoint. The primary risk is to deployments where the web management interface is reachable from untrusted networks, particularly if remote management is enabled on the WAN interface.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has obtained or guessed low-privilege credentials to the TEW-823DRU web management interface sends a crafted HTTP POST or GET request to /cgi-bin/admin.cgi, embedding shell metacharacters in the Hostname parameter (for example, appending a semicolon followed by an arbitrary command). The CGI handler passes the unsanitized parameter to an OS-level command, executing the injected payload with the privileges of the web server process. A public Python proof-of-concept script hosted at https://github.com/meishigana/CVE/blob/main/team15_20260702/11_823dru-rc-cmdi/poc/poc-rc-injection.py makes this attack readily reproducible by low-skill actors.

Monitor Track and reassess. Why: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9).
No patch listed yet 1.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 19, 2026

Command injection in TRENDnet TEW-823DRU firmware version 1.1.02b01 allows a network-accessible, low-privileged authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary OS commands by manipulating the Hostname parameter in the /cgi-bin/admin.cgi endpoint. The flaw is classified as CWE-77 and carries a CVSS 4.0 base score of 2.1 with the E:P threat modifier applied, reflecting a publicly available proof-of-concept exploit on GitHub. No vendor-released patch has been identified at time of analysis, and the vulnerability is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch has been identified at time of analysis; TRENDnet has not published a formal advisory. As primary compensating controls, administrators should disable remote (WAN-side) web management on the TEW-823DRU immediately, restricting administrative interface access to the LAN only - this eliminates the network-reachable attack surface for internet-facing attackers. Additionally, firewall rules or ACLs should be applied to restrict access to port 80/443 on the management interface to trusted management hosts only. Rotating all administrative credentials reduces risk from credential-based exploitation. Note that LAN-side access still permits exploitation by a threat actor with LAN foothold, so network segmentation of the management interface is also advisable. Monitor https://vuldb.com/vuln/391903 and the TRENDnet support pages for patch releases.

Affected VersionsENISA

TEW-823DRU 1.1.02b01

Affected Packages

euvd tew_823dru no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The affected product is the TRENDnet TEW-823DRU consumer wireless router running firmware version 1.1.02b01, identified by CPE cpe:2.3:a:trendnet:tew-823dru:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*. The vulnerability resides in a CGI handler exposed at /cgi-bin/admin.cgi, a common pattern in embedded Linux-based router firmware where administrative functions are served via CGI scripts executed by the web server process. CWE-77 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command) identifies the root cause: the Hostname argument supplied by the user is passed to an underlying OS command without adequate sanitization of shell metacharacters, allowing injection of arbitrary shell instructions. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L) confirms network reachability with no special attack preconditions beyond a low-privilege authenticated session.

Know when Tew 823Dru gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulDB) PRIMARY 2.1 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:P
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

PR:L reflects required authenticated session; command injection on embedded router firmware typically enables full system compromise across confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulDB).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulDB

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
Low
Vulnerable system: Integrity
Low
Vulnerable system: Availability
Low
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
Low
Subsequent system: Integrity
Low
Subsequent system: Availability
Low

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Severity Changed
Aug 19, 2026 - 01:22 NVD
MEDIUM LOW
CVSS changed
Aug 19, 2026 - 01:22 NVD
5.3 (MEDIUM) 2.1 (LOW)
CVE Published
Aug 19, 2026 - 01:00 cve.org
LOW 2.1

DescriptionCVE.org

A vulnerability was detected in TRENDnet TEW-823DRU 1.1.02b01. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /cgi-bin/admin.cgi. The manipulation of the argument Hostname results in command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
1.3%
Top 32% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
Consumer SOHO router with limited enterprise deployment footprint.
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
7 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment CIRCL GitHub VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity LOW
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 1.3%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Low
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

31
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +10
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy