Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessRegister or obtain WordPress subscriber account
-
DeliveryIdentify SSRF endpoint in ProSolution WP Client plugin
-
ExploitCraft HTTP request with internal target URL, method, and custom headers
-
ExecutionSubmit authenticated request to vulnerable plugin function
-
PersistServer issues HTTP request to internal host
-
ImpactHarvest response to enumerate internal services or pivot further
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires a valid WordPress user account at subscriber level or above - the lowest authenticated role, often freely obtainable via open registration. No special plugin configuration, non-default settings, or elevated WordPress role is required; the vulnerability is present in the plugin's default installed state due to the complete absence of capability and nonce checks on the affected function. The attack is limited by: (1) the need for at least one authenticated session - unauthenticated users cannot exploit this; (2) the server's network reachability to the targeted internal host - services not reachable from the server's network position cannot be probed; and (3) blind versus reflected SSRF behavior depends on whether the plugin returns response data to the caller, which is not fully specified in available sources. Sites with user registration disabled and no active subscriber accounts have materially reduced exposure. |
| Impact | The CVSS 6.4 Medium score with vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N accurately captures the risk profile: network-reachable, low-complexity exploitation, but gated by a requirement for at least subscriber-level authentication. SSVC rates Exploitation as 'none' - likely reflecting no confirmed in-the-wild cases - yet this conflicts with the confirmed publicly available exploit code, meaning practical exploitation difficulty is lower than SSVC suggests; the 'Automatable: no' rating aligns with the authentication prerequisite. EPSS data is absent from the input, limiting probabilistic forecasting. The S:C scope change is the most consequential signal: successful exploitation enables pivoting to internal services (metadata APIs, internal admin panels, monitoring endpoints) that the attacker cannot reach directly. Even a mid-sized municipal IT team in mielec running a membership-based WordPress portal should treat this as a near-term patch priority given that subscriber accounts are often freely self-registered. No CISA KEV listing means active exploitation is not confirmed, but the combination of a low-barrier authentication requirement and public exploit code makes this a realistic near-term threat for any site with open registration. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker registers a free subscriber account on a WordPress site running ProSolution WP Client before 2.0.9, then sends a crafted authenticated POST request to the vulnerable plugin endpoint, specifying an internal IP address (such as http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/ for cloud metadata or http://127.0.0.1:8080/admin for a local admin panel) as the target URL along with attacker-chosen headers and a request body. The server executes the request on the attacker's behalf and may return the internal service response. With publicly available exploit code documented by WPScan, this attack requires minimal technical skill beyond obtaining a subscriber account. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 12, 2026
Server-side request forgery in ProSolution WP Client WordPress plugin (all versions before 2.0.9) allows any authenticated user - including low-privileged subscribers - to force the hosting server to issue arbitrary HTTP requests to internal hosts and services, with full attacker control over request method, headers, and body. The vulnerability bypasses both WordPress capability checks and nonce verification entirely. Publicly available exploit code exists, though no CISA KEV listing confirms active in-the-wild exploitation at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
The primary fix is to upgrade ProSolution WP Client to version 2.0.9 or later, which is confirmed available from the vendor per patch data and documented in the WPScan advisory at https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/76d9ef00-5335-4373-903c-4ff368417f94/. Where immediate patching is not possible, administrators should disable the ProSolution WP Client plugin entirely until the upgrade can be applied - this eliminates the attack surface at the cost of client-portal functionality. As a network-layer compensating control, outbound server-initiated HTTP requests to RFC 1918 addresses (10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16) and localhost should be blocked at the firewall or via a WAF egress rule; this limits SSRF pivot capability but does not prevent the request from being issued to external targets or blind probe scenarios. Disabling open subscriber registration reduces the attacker pool but does not remediate the vulnerability for sites with existing low-trust user accounts.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-918 (Server-Side Request Forgery): the plugin accepts a user-supplied URL parameter and executes a server-side HTTP request against it without sanitizing the target address, validating the requester's WordPress capability, or verifying a nonce. This means the hosting server's network identity and trust relationships - including access to internal services on RFC 1918 addresses or localhost - are fully leveraged by the attacker. The CVSS Scope metric S:C correctly reflects that the impact extends beyond the vulnerable WordPress component to internal network resources otherwise inaccessible to the attacker. The CPE string cpe:2.3:a:unknown:prosolution_wp_client records the vendor as 'unknown' in NVD, indicating limited vendor representation in the national database. The missing capability check is particularly significant in WordPress's permission model, as it means subscriber-role users - the lowest authenticated tier - can invoke a function designed for privileged operations.
Know when Prosolution Wp Client gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Network-reachable SSRF requiring only subscriber authentication (PR:L); scope changes to internal services (S:C); partial confidentiality and integrity impact via arbitrary internal requests; no availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (WPScan).
CVSS VectorVendor: WPScan
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
The ProSolution WP Client WordPress plugin before 2.0.9 does not validate a user-supplied URL, and does not check the capability or nonce of the requester, before performing a server-side HTTP request with it, allowing any authenticated user, such as a subscriber, to make the site issue arbitrary requests to internal hosts and services, including requests with an attacker-chosen method, headers and body.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.
More in Prosolution Wp Client
View allSQL injection in the ProSolution WP Client WordPress plugin (all versions before 2.0.6) lets remote attackers inject SQL
Unauthenticated SQL injection in the ProSolution WP Client WordPress plugin (all versions before 2.0.9) exposes arbitrar
Missing authorization on two administrative AJAX endpoints in ProSolution WP Client WordPress plugin before 2.0.9 allows
Unauthenticated arbitrary file upload leading to remote code execution affects the ProSolution WP Client WordPress plugi
Unauthenticated remote code execution in the ProSolution WP Client WordPress plugin (versions ≤ 2.0.0) allows attackers
Unauthenticated arbitrary file upload in ProSolution WP Client plugin (≤1.9.9) enables attackers to upload executable fi
Arbitrary file deletion in the ProSolution WP Client WordPress plugin (all versions through 2.0.8) lets unauthenticated
EUVD-2026-57105
GHSA-cjm3-jv49-2qgp
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB