Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Attacker deploys malicious SMB server
  2. Delivery
    Deliver crafted UNC path link to target user
  3. Exploit
    User initiates SMB client connection to attacker server
  4. Execution
    Malicious server sends specially formed response
  5. Persist
    Buffer over-read triggered in Windows SMB Client
  6. Impact
    Memory contents disclosed to attacker over network

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Buffer over-read prevention
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires that a Windows user actively interacts with a resource controlled by the attacker - specifically, the SMB Client must initiate a connection to a malicious SMB server (UI:R per CVSS vector). This interaction could be triggered by a user clicking a UNC path hyperlink, mounting a network share from an untrusted host, or opening a shortcut or document referencing an attacker-controlled SMB location. No attacker-side authentication is required (PR:N per CVSS vector), and no special SMB client configuration beyond default Windows behavior is needed. Exploitation is fundamentally limited by the user interaction requirement: automated network-wide scanning, worm-style propagation, or unaided server-side exploitation is not feasible without user involvement. The vulnerability is client-side only - Windows SMB Server is not an attack surface here. Only Windows builds below the fixed version thresholds listed in the EUVD data are vulnerable; systems running current cumulative updates are not affected.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N) scores 6.5 and captures a meaningful but structurally bounded risk: network-reachable, low-complexity exploitation with no attacker privileges required, but user interaction is a necessary prerequisite that materially prevents automated mass exploitation. The SSVC framework corroborates this - exploitation status is none and technical impact is rated partial, placing this comfortably below emergency out-of-band triage thresholds. EPSS data is absent from the provided intelligence, which is a notable gap; without it, precise exploitation probability cannot be independently estimated. KEV status is not present, confirming no CISA-verified active exploitation at time of analysis. Despite the C:H rating, the UI:R condition creates friction that prevents spray-style network attacks - even a mid-sized municipal IT team in inowroclaw managing a heterogeneous Windows fleet should treat this as a standard Patch Tuesday priority rather than an emergency response. The breadth of affected Windows versions amplifies aggregate fleet-level exposure, but individual exploitation requires deliberate user engagement with a malicious SMB resource.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker stands up a malicious SMB server on a network segment reachable by target Windows systems and crafts specially malformed SMB server responses designed to trigger the buffer over-read in the Windows SMB Client. The attacker then delivers a UNC path link (such as \\attacker-server\share) to a target user via phishing email, a malicious document, or a web page, inducing the user to connect - which causes the Windows SMB Client to process the malicious response, read past the allocated buffer boundary, and leak memory contents back to the attacker over the network. No public exploit code is known at time of analysis, but the low attack complexity (AC:L) suggests that the exploitation technique itself is straightforward once user interaction is achieved.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.7% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 11, 2026

Information disclosure via a buffer over-read in the Windows SMB Client component affects a broad spectrum of Microsoft Windows desktop and server editions, from Windows Server 2012 through Windows 11 25H2. An attacker who controls a malicious SMB server and induces a target Windows user to connect to it can trigger the client to read beyond allocated memory buffer boundaries, leaking potentially sensitive process memory contents across the network. SSVC rates exploitation status as none and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, though the high confidentiality impact (C:H) and the near-universal deployment footprint of the Windows SMB Client make this a meaningful routine patch priority.

RemediationAI

The primary remediation is to apply the Microsoft-released cumulative update that advances affected builds beyond the thresholds confirmed in EUVD-2026-56740: Windows Server 2025 to 10.0.26100.33296, Windows Server 2022 to 10.0.20348.5499, Windows Server 2019 to 10.0.17763.9115, Windows Server 2016 to 10.0.14393.9418, Windows Server 2012 R2 to 6.3.9600.23337, Windows Server 2012 to 6.2.9200.26279, and the corresponding Windows 10/11 client builds listed above. Full advisory details are at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-65794. Where immediate patching is not feasible, a compensating control is to restrict outbound SMB traffic (TCP port 445) from client systems to only trusted internal SMB servers using Windows Firewall rules or network perimeter ACLs - this prevents the SMB Client from reaching attacker-controlled servers, though it will disrupt access to any external or cloud-hosted SMB shares. Windows Server 2012 and 2012 R2 are beyond standard support and require Extended Security Update (ESU) enrollment to receive this patch; organizations without ESU coverage should treat network isolation of these hosts as an urgent priority.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26279
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26279
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23337
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33296
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9115
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23337
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9418
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9115
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19045.7663
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9418
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9115
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9168
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9168
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9418
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.2704
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7663
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7517
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5499
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33296

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9418
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9115
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7663
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19045.7663
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7517
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9168
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9168
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.2704
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26279
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23337
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23337
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26279
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9418
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9418
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9115
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9115
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5499
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33296
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33296

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 19 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The affected component is the Windows SMB Client, which implements the Server Message Block protocol used natively across Windows environments for network file sharing, printer access, and remote service communication. The root cause is CWE-126 (Buffer Over-Read), a memory safety condition where the client reads data beyond the end of an allocated buffer when parsing malicious SMB server responses, potentially exposing adjacent memory regions. SMB Client is a default-enabled system component in all affected Windows versions - no special installation or feature activation is required for exposure. ENISA EUVD data (EUVD-2026-56740) confirms impact across both x86 client editions (Windows 10 1607 through Windows 11 25H2) and server variants (Windows Server 2012 through Windows Server 2025), spanning both full and Server Core installation modes.

Know when Windows 10 1607 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 6.5 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI 6.5 MEDIUM

Attacker controls a remote SMB server (AV:N, PR:N); user must connect to it (UI:R, AC:L); only memory disclosure results with no integrity or availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Aug 11, 2026 - 18:19 EUVD
CVE Published
Aug 11, 2026 - 17:18 cve.org
MEDIUM 6.5

DescriptionCVE.org

Buffer over-read in Windows SMB Client allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.7%
Top 51% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
SMB Client ships enabled by default in all Windows versions
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Unlikely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.7%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

33
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 17

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows

CVE-2018-8174 HIGH POC
7.5 May 09

The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2016-7255 HIGH POC
7.8 Nov 10

The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2023-44487 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 10

Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour

CVE-2024-30088 HIGH POC
7.0 Jun 11

Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR

CVE-2019-1458 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy