Skip to main content

Severity by source

Vendor (redhat) PRIMARY
LOW
qualitative
NVD
3.7 LOW
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
vuln.today AI
3.7 LOW

Network-reachable but AC:H due to required reverse DNS control; no credentials needed; only limited client-configuration integrity impact, no confidentiality or availability effect.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (redhat).

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Analysis Generated
Jul 31, 2026 - 07:53 vuln.today
CVE Published
Jul 31, 2026 - 07:08 cve.org
LOW 3.7

DescriptionNVD

A flaw was found in the keycloak-services component of Keycloak, which provides identity and access management services. The issue occurs when a realm administrator uses a wildcard domain (like *.example.com) to restrict which hosts can register or update clients. Due to improper validation, the system accepts any hostname that ends with the specified domain suffix, even if it is not a legitimate subdomain. An attacker who can control the reverse DNS of their connection can bypass these host-based restrictions, potentially allowing unauthorized client modifications.

AnalysisAI

Wildcard domain validation in Keycloak's keycloak-services component can be bypassed by an attacker who controls their connection's reverse DNS, enabling unauthorized client registration or modification against a Keycloak realm. The flaw stems from the system accepting any hostname that merely ends with the configured domain suffix (e.g., 'attackerexample.com' satisfying a '*.example.com' restriction) rather than enforcing true subdomain membership. Exploitation requires high attack complexity due to the reverse DNS control prerequisite, and no public exploit or CISA KEV listing has been identified at the time of analysis.

Technical ContextAI

The keycloak-services component implements host-based restrictions on client registration and update operations, allowing realm administrators to configure wildcard domain patterns (e.g., '*.example.com') to permit only trusted hosts. CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation) describes the root cause: the validation logic performs a suffix-match check rather than a proper subdomain parse, failing to verify the presence of a subdomain delimiter before the domain component. A hostname such as 'attackerexample.com' satisfies a suffix check against 'example.com' but is not a legitimate subdomain of 'example.com'. Because Keycloak uses the connecting client's hostname - resolvable via reverse DNS - for this check, an attacker who controls their server's PTR record can craft a reverse DNS entry to satisfy the flawed validation. Affected products per CPE data include Red Hat Build of Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign-On 7, Red Hat Data Grid 8, and Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack.

RemediationAI

Patch availability per vendor advisory: a patch is available per Red Hat advisory (https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-18206), but an exact patched version number is not confirmed in the available intelligence - consult the Red Hat advisory and Bugzilla entry (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2508292) for the specific fixed build. As an immediate compensating control, realm administrators should replace wildcard domain entries in client registration policies with explicit, fully qualified domain names (e.g., replace '*.example.com' with 'app.example.com', 'api.example.com') - this eliminates the suffix-match ambiguity entirely, though it requires enumerating all legitimate subdomains and increases administrative overhead when new subdomains are added. Alternatively, restrict client registration and update operations to authenticated realm administrators only, removing reliance on host-based restrictions as an access control mechanism.

CVE-2026-18963 CRITICAL POC
9.1 Aug 18

Account takeover in Red Hat Build of Keycloak allows an unauthenticated attacker to abuse the reset-credentials flow in

CVE-2026-16442 CRITICAL
9.8 Aug 05

Account takeover in Keycloak (Red Hat build of Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign-On 7) arises because the IdP-initiated SAML

CVE-2026-16443 CRITICAL
9.1 Aug 05

Authentication bypass in Red Hat Build of Keycloak (and Red Hat Single Sign-On 7) lets an unauthenticated attacker forge

CVE-2026-15572 HIGH
8.8 Aug 05

Privilege escalation in Red Hat Build of Keycloak's Dynamic Client Registration (DCR) grants an attacker with low-privil

CVE-2026-93569 HIGH
8.2 Sep 18

Mismatched handling of the HTTP/1 absolute-form request authority in Red Hat build of Quarkus and other affected Red Hat

CVE-2026-9800 HIGH
8.1 Jun 25

Authorization bypass in the Keycloak Policy Enforcer allows any authenticated user to circumvent all enforced access con

CVE-2026-15573 HIGH
8.1 Aug 05

URI normalization bypass in Keycloak's Authorization Services PathMatcher allows authenticated low-privilege users to re

CVE-2026-16102 HIGH
8.1 Aug 05

Privilege escalation in Keycloak's Dynamic Client Registration (DCR) component allows attackers with standard user accou

CVE-2026-18214 HIGH
8.1 Jul 31

Token exchange in Keycloak bypasses Google Workspace domain allowlist restrictions, enabling any valid Google account ho

CVE-2026-11800 HIGH
8.1 Jun 25

Signature-verification bypass in Keycloak (and Red Hat's Keycloak-based products such as Red Hat Single Sign-On 7 and Re

CVE-2026-18215 HIGH
8.1 Jul 31

Tenant-restriction bypass in Keycloak's Microsoft identity provider integration allows attackers holding any valid Micro

CVE-2026-18967 HIGH
8.1 Aug 06

Session hijacking via SAML assertion replay in Keycloak's SAML broker component allows adjacent-network attackers to aut

Share

EUVD-2026-51486 vulnerability details – vuln.today

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy