Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessIdentify HCL DevOps Loop instance
-
DeliveryHost malicious page embedding Loop in iframe or injecting script
-
ExploitVictim user visits attacker-controlled page
-
ExecutionAbsent X-Frame-Options or CSP enables clickjacking or script execution
-
ImpactExfiltrate limited session or credential data
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization HTTP header neutralization
|
| Exploitation Conditions | No authentication or special privilege is required to receive HTTP responses lacking security headers, as the headers are absent from all server responses by default. However, the CVSS AC:H rating indicates exploitation is not straightforward: meaningful harm requires that an attacker successfully chain this weakness with a separate technique - for clickjacking, the attacker must socially engineer a user into visiting a malicious page that embeds the Loop application in an iframe; for XSS facilitation, a separate script injection point must exist in the application. Limiting factors include: no direct code execution path from missing headers alone; no integrity or availability impact per CVSS; and the requirement for either user interaction or a secondary vulnerability to translate missing headers into actual harm. The vulnerability affects all deployments of HCL DevOps Loop regardless of configuration - no non-default setting is required to be vulnerable. |
| Impact | The CVSS 3.1 base score of 3.7 (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N) classifies this as Low severity. The high attack complexity (AC:H) is the dominant risk-limiting factor: missing headers do not themselves trigger exploitation; an attacker must successfully chain a secondary attack vector - crafting a malicious page for clickjacking, finding an injected script opportunity for XSS, or leveraging MIME confusion - for any harm to materialize. Scope is unchanged (S:U), and impact is limited to confidentiality at a low level with no integrity or availability impact. No EPSS score was provided, and no KEV listing or POC exists based on available data, which is consistent with the low real-world urgency. This is a genuine but low-priority finding: it matters as a hardening gap and compliance concern (e.g., OWASP ASVS, PCI DSS web security controls) rather than as an immediately exploitable vulnerability. The absence of EPSS and version scope data limits confidence in a precise exploitation probability assessment. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker wishing to perform clickjacking against HCL DevOps Loop users could host a transparent iframe embedding the application inside a malicious webpage, tricking authenticated users into performing unintended actions - feasible specifically because X-Frame-Options or a CSP frame-ancestors directive is absent. Separately, the lack of a Content-Security-Policy makes it easier to inject and execute malicious scripts if any XSS injection point exists elsewhere in the application. No public exploit code has been identified at the time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 17, 2026
HCL DevOps Loop omits critical HTTP security response headers, degrading browser-enforced protections against clickjacking, MIME-type sniffing, and cross-site scripting for all users of the application. The absence of headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options does not introduce a standalone exploit path but removes a layer of defense-in-depth that browsers rely on to block client-side attack chains. CVSS assigns a low score of 3.7 with high attack complexity, reflecting that meaningful impact requires chaining this weakness with a secondary technique; no public exploit has been identified and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV.
RemediationAI
The primary remediation is to review and apply the guidance in HCL's knowledge base article KB0132296 at https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article&sysparm_article=KB0132296, which may include a patched release or configuration update; an exact fix version is not confirmed from available data. As a compensating control, administrators can deploy a reverse proxy (nginx, Apache HTTP Server, or a WAF) in front of HCL DevOps Loop configured to inject the missing response headers: X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN, X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff, a restrictive Content-Security-Policy appropriate to the application's resource requirements, and Referrer-Policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin. Trade-off: proxy-injected headers may duplicate or conflict with headers added by a future application-level patch, requiring configuration cleanup after upgrading. A CSP policy that is too restrictive may break application functionality and should be tested in a non-production environment before deployment.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
CWE-644 (Improper Neutralization of HTTP Headers for Scripting Syntax) describes failures to set HTTP response headers that browsers use to enforce security policies. The expected headers include X-Frame-Options or the frame-ancestors CSP directive (clickjacking), X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff (MIME-sniffing), Content-Security-Policy (XSS policy enforcement), and optionally Strict-Transport-Security and Referrer-Policy. HCL DevOps Loop is a DevOps workflow and collaboration platform from HCL Software. No CPE strings were provided in the input data, so exact platform or version identification from CPE is not possible. The XSS tag suggests the missing CSP header is a primary concern, as a well-formed CSP would restrict inline script execution and unauthorized resource origins.
Know when Devops Loop gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
AC:H because exploitation requires chaining with a social-engineering step; UI:R because browser attacks like clickjacking require user interaction with a malicious page.
Primary rating from NVD.
CVSS VectorNVD
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionNVD
HCL DevOps Loop is affected by missing HTTP security headers. Missing security headers may reduce browser protections against common web-based attacks such as clickjacking, MIME-type sniffing, and cross-site scripting.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.
More in Devops Loop
View allSession hijacking in IBM DevOps Automation 1.0.1 and IBM DevOps Loop 1.0.2 allows an authenticated user to impersonate a
CORS misconfiguration in HCL DevOps Loop enables authenticated network-adjacent attackers to perform unauthorized cross-
Forced browsing vulnerability in HCL DevOps Loop allows authenticated low-privileged users to access restricted administ
Insufficient input validation in HCL DevOps Loop permits special characters in fields where they should be restricted, e
EUVD-2026-45232
GHSA-hg49-v9p7-xwqr
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB