Skip to main content

HCL DevOps Loop CVE-2026-21762

| EUVDEUVD-2026-45232 MEDIUM
Improper Neutralization of HTTP Headers for Scripting Syntax (CWE-644)
2026-07-17 psirt@hcl.com GHSA-hg49-v9p7-xwqr
5.3
CVSS 3.1 · NVD
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Identify HCL DevOps Loop instance
  2. Delivery
    Host malicious page embedding Loop in iframe or injecting script
  3. Exploit
    Victim user visits attacker-controlled page
  4. Execution
    Absent X-Frame-Options or CSP enables clickjacking or script execution
  5. Impact
    Exfiltrate limited session or credential data

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization HTTP header neutralization
Exploitation Conditions

No authentication or special privilege is required to receive HTTP responses lacking security headers, as the headers are absent from all server responses by default. However, the CVSS AC:H rating indicates exploitation is not straightforward: meaningful harm requires that an attacker successfully chain this weakness with a separate technique - for clickjacking, the attacker must socially engineer a user into visiting a malicious page that embeds the Loop application in an iframe; for XSS facilitation, a separate script injection point must exist in the application. Limiting factors include: no direct code execution path from missing headers alone; no integrity or availability impact per CVSS; and the requirement for either user interaction or a secondary vulnerability to translate missing headers into actual harm. The vulnerability affects all deployments of HCL DevOps Loop regardless of configuration - no non-default setting is required to be vulnerable.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 base score of 3.7 (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N) classifies this as Low severity. The high attack complexity (AC:H) is the dominant risk-limiting factor: missing headers do not themselves trigger exploitation; an attacker must successfully chain a secondary attack vector - crafting a malicious page for clickjacking, finding an injected script opportunity for XSS, or leveraging MIME confusion - for any harm to materialize. Scope is unchanged (S:U), and impact is limited to confidentiality at a low level with no integrity or availability impact. No EPSS score was provided, and no KEV listing or POC exists based on available data, which is consistent with the low real-world urgency. This is a genuine but low-priority finding: it matters as a hardening gap and compliance concern (e.g., OWASP ASVS, PCI DSS web security controls) rather than as an immediately exploitable vulnerability. The absence of EPSS and version scope data limits confidence in a precise exploitation probability assessment.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker wishing to perform clickjacking against HCL DevOps Loop users could host a transparent iframe embedding the application inside a malicious webpage, tricking authenticated users into performing unintended actions - feasible specifically because X-Frame-Options or a CSP frame-ancestors directive is absent. Separately, the lack of a Content-Security-Policy makes it easier to inject and execute malicious scripts if any XSS injection point exists elsewhere in the application. No public exploit code has been identified at the time of analysis.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 17, 2026

HCL DevOps Loop omits critical HTTP security response headers, degrading browser-enforced protections against clickjacking, MIME-type sniffing, and cross-site scripting for all users of the application. The absence of headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options does not introduce a standalone exploit path but removes a layer of defense-in-depth that browsers rely on to block client-side attack chains. CVSS assigns a low score of 3.7 with high attack complexity, reflecting that meaningful impact requires chaining this weakness with a secondary technique; no public exploit has been identified and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV.

RemediationAI

The primary remediation is to review and apply the guidance in HCL's knowledge base article KB0132296 at https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article&sysparm_article=KB0132296, which may include a patched release or configuration update; an exact fix version is not confirmed from available data. As a compensating control, administrators can deploy a reverse proxy (nginx, Apache HTTP Server, or a WAF) in front of HCL DevOps Loop configured to inject the missing response headers: X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN, X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff, a restrictive Content-Security-Policy appropriate to the application's resource requirements, and Referrer-Policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin. Trade-off: proxy-injected headers may duplicate or conflict with headers added by a future application-level patch, requiring configuration cleanup after upgrading. A CSP policy that is too restrictive may break application functionality and should be tested in a non-production environment before deployment.

Affected VersionsENISA

DevOps Loop 2.0.0

Affected Packages

euvd devops_loop no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

CWE-644 (Improper Neutralization of HTTP Headers for Scripting Syntax) describes failures to set HTTP response headers that browsers use to enforce security policies. The expected headers include X-Frame-Options or the frame-ancestors CSP directive (clickjacking), X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff (MIME-sniffing), Content-Security-Policy (XSS policy enforcement), and optionally Strict-Transport-Security and Referrer-Policy. HCL DevOps Loop is a DevOps workflow and collaboration platform from HCL Software. No CPE strings were provided in the input data, so exact platform or version identification from CPE is not possible. The XSS tag suggests the missing CSP header is a primary concern, as a well-formed CSP would restrict inline script execution and unauthorized resource origins.

Know when Devops Loop gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

NVD PRIMARY 5.3 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI 3.1 LOW

AC:H because exploitation requires chaining with a social-engineering step; UI:R because browser attacks like clickjacking require user interaction with a malicious page.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from NVD.

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Severity Changed
Aug 13, 2026 - 13:07 NVD
LOW MEDIUM
CVSS changed
Aug 13, 2026 - 13:07 NVD
3.7 (LOW) 5.3 (MEDIUM)

DescriptionNVD

HCL DevOps Loop is affected by missing HTTP security headers. Missing security headers may reduce browser protections against common web-based attacks such as clickjacking, MIME-type sniffing, and cross-site scripting.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 93% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche HCL DevOps platform, limited enterprise footprint
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

26
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +26
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy