Skip to main content

IBM Langflow Desktop EUVDEUVD-2026-36254

| CVE-2026-3341 MEDIUM
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918)
2026-06-11 ibm GHSA-wvfv-3qjh-qwxj
5.4
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: ibm
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate with low-privilege credentials
  2. Delivery
    Submit crafted URL payload to Langflow workflow or API
  3. Exploit
    Application issues server-side HTTP request to attacker-specified target
  4. Execution
    Response returned to attacker, exposing internal service data
  5. Impact
    Enumerate internal network or harvest cloud metadata credentials

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires a valid low-privileged user account on the IBM Langflow Desktop instance (confirmed by CVSS PR:L). The attack is network-based with no special configuration required beyond having access to the application's interface (AV:N, AC:L). No user interaction by a victim is needed (UI:N). Limiting factors include: the requirement for prior authentication with at least low-privileged credentials prevents fully unauthenticated exploitation; scope is unchanged (S:U) so the SSRF alone does not directly compromise other systems; and real-world impact escalation depends on what internal services or metadata endpoints are reachable from the server's network position.

Impact

The CVSS 5.4 Medium score is consistent with real-world risk assessment for this vulnerability class. The vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N conveys that exploitation is straightforward from a network perspective once credentials are obtained, but the PR:L requirement is a meaningful barrier - unauthenticated exploitation is not supported by the available data. Scope is unchanged (S:U), meaning the attacker cannot directly pivot to compromise adjacent systems through this vulnerability alone, though SSRF is commonly chained with other weaknesses. No EPSS score was provided in the input data, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified. No CISA KEV listing and no public POC exist at time of analysis, placing this in a lower active-exploitation tier. The primary real-world concern is use of SSRF for internal network enumeration or metadata service abuse in cloud-hosted deployments, which could amplify the confidentiality impact beyond what the C:L metric alone suggests.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An authenticated Langflow Desktop user submits a workflow node or API call containing a crafted URL targeting an internal service - such as http://192.168.1.1/admin or http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/ - causing the Langflow server process to issue the request and return the response to the attacker. No public POC has been identified, but SSRF exploitation techniques against this class of vulnerability are widely documented and require no specialized tooling beyond standard HTTP clients. In cloud deployments, successful retrieval of instance metadata could expose IAM credentials or other sensitive configuration.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jun 11, 2026

Server-side request forgery in IBM Langflow Desktop 1.0.0 through 1.9.2 enables authenticated network-based attackers to coerce the application into issuing arbitrary outbound HTTP requests on their behalf. The vulnerability, classified under CWE-918, can expose internal network topology by proxying requests through the server to otherwise inaccessible hosts, and may serve as a stepping stone for further lateral movement or credential harvesting from cloud metadata services. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and a vendor-released patch is available via IBM advisory.

RemediationAI

Patch available per vendor advisory - apply the update referenced at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7275444 as the primary remediation step; the exact patched version number is not specified in the available input data and should be confirmed directly from that advisory. If immediate patching is not feasible, restrict outbound network egress from the host running IBM Langflow Desktop using host-based firewall rules or network-layer controls to deny connections to RFC-1918 address ranges, loopback, and cloud metadata IP ranges (e.g., 169.254.169.254, 100.100.100.200); note that this may interfere with legitimate external integrations in Langflow workflows. Additionally, enforce least-privilege access controls to limit which users can authenticate to the Langflow Desktop interface, reducing the pool of potential attackers.

Affected VersionsENISA

Langflow Desktop 1.0.0 ≤1.9.2

Affected Packages

euvd langflow_desktop no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

IBM Langflow Desktop is a visual, flow-based development environment for constructing AI and large-language-model pipelines. CWE-918 (Server-Side Request Forgery) arises when an application fetches a remote resource based on user-supplied input without sufficiently validating or restricting the target URL, allowing the application server itself to act as an unintended proxy. In this context, attacker-controlled URLs can be directed at internal RFC-1918 addresses, localhost services, or cloud instance metadata endpoints (e.g., 169.254.169.254), bypassing perimeter controls. The affected CPE is cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_desktop:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, covering all Desktop releases from 1.0.0 through 1.9.2. The CVSS vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:L reflects that the attack surface is the network-accessible application interface and only low-privileged credentials are needed.

Know when Langflow Desktop gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (ibm) PRIMARY 5.4 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
vuln.today AI 5.4 MEDIUM

Network-accessible SSRF requiring low-privilege authentication (PR:L); limited confidentiality and integrity impact from unauthorized request forwarding; no availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).

CVSS VectorVendor: ibm

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

IBM Langflow Desktop 1.0.0 through 1.9.2 IBM Langflow is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.0%
Top 93% exploitable
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.0%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

27
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +27
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy