Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate with low-privilege credentials
-
DeliverySubmit crafted URL payload to Langflow workflow or API
-
ExploitApplication issues server-side HTTP request to attacker-specified target
-
ExecutionResponse returned to attacker, exposing internal service data
-
ImpactEnumerate internal network or harvest cloud metadata credentials
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires a valid low-privileged user account on the IBM Langflow Desktop instance (confirmed by CVSS PR:L). The attack is network-based with no special configuration required beyond having access to the application's interface (AV:N, AC:L). No user interaction by a victim is needed (UI:N). Limiting factors include: the requirement for prior authentication with at least low-privileged credentials prevents fully unauthenticated exploitation; scope is unchanged (S:U) so the SSRF alone does not directly compromise other systems; and real-world impact escalation depends on what internal services or metadata endpoints are reachable from the server's network position. |
| Impact | The CVSS 5.4 Medium score is consistent with real-world risk assessment for this vulnerability class. The vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N conveys that exploitation is straightforward from a network perspective once credentials are obtained, but the PR:L requirement is a meaningful barrier - unauthenticated exploitation is not supported by the available data. Scope is unchanged (S:U), meaning the attacker cannot directly pivot to compromise adjacent systems through this vulnerability alone, though SSRF is commonly chained with other weaknesses. No EPSS score was provided in the input data, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified. No CISA KEV listing and no public POC exist at time of analysis, placing this in a lower active-exploitation tier. The primary real-world concern is use of SSRF for internal network enumeration or metadata service abuse in cloud-hosted deployments, which could amplify the confidentiality impact beyond what the C:L metric alone suggests. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An authenticated Langflow Desktop user submits a workflow node or API call containing a crafted URL targeting an internal service - such as http://192.168.1.1/admin or http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/ - causing the Langflow server process to issue the request and return the response to the attacker. No public POC has been identified, but SSRF exploitation techniques against this class of vulnerability are widely documented and require no specialized tooling beyond standard HTTP clients. In cloud deployments, successful retrieval of instance metadata could expose IAM credentials or other sensitive configuration. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jun 11, 2026
Server-side request forgery in IBM Langflow Desktop 1.0.0 through 1.9.2 enables authenticated network-based attackers to coerce the application into issuing arbitrary outbound HTTP requests on their behalf. The vulnerability, classified under CWE-918, can expose internal network topology by proxying requests through the server to otherwise inaccessible hosts, and may serve as a stepping stone for further lateral movement or credential harvesting from cloud metadata services. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and a vendor-released patch is available via IBM advisory.
RemediationAI
Patch available per vendor advisory - apply the update referenced at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7275444 as the primary remediation step; the exact patched version number is not specified in the available input data and should be confirmed directly from that advisory. If immediate patching is not feasible, restrict outbound network egress from the host running IBM Langflow Desktop using host-based firewall rules or network-layer controls to deny connections to RFC-1918 address ranges, loopback, and cloud metadata IP ranges (e.g., 169.254.169.254, 100.100.100.200); note that this may interfere with legitimate external integrations in Langflow workflows. Additionally, enforce least-privilege access controls to limit which users can authenticate to the Langflow Desktop interface, reducing the pool of potential attackers.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
IBM Langflow Desktop is a visual, flow-based development environment for constructing AI and large-language-model pipelines. CWE-918 (Server-Side Request Forgery) arises when an application fetches a remote resource based on user-supplied input without sufficiently validating or restricting the target URL, allowing the application server itself to act as an unintended proxy. In this context, attacker-controlled URLs can be directed at internal RFC-1918 addresses, localhost services, or cloud instance metadata endpoints (e.g., 169.254.169.254), bypassing perimeter controls. The affected CPE is cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_desktop:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, covering all Desktop releases from 1.0.0 through 1.9.2. The CVSS vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:L reflects that the attack surface is the network-accessible application interface and only low-privileged credentials are needed.
Know when Langflow Desktop gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Network-accessible SSRF requiring low-privilege authentication (PR:L); limited confidentiality and integrity impact from unauthorized request forwarding; no availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).
CVSS VectorVendor: ibm
DescriptionCVE.org
IBM Langflow Desktop 1.0.0 through 1.9.2 IBM Langflow is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.
More in Langflow Desktop
View allRemote code execution in IBM Langflow Desktop versions 1.6.0 through 1.8.2 allows authenticated attackers to execute arb
Remote code execution in IBM Langflow Desktop 1.0.0 through 1.8.4 allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary co
Unauthenticated remote disclosure of user-uploaded images in IBM Langflow Desktop 1.0.0-1.8.4 allows network attackers t
Path traversal in IBM Langflow Desktop versions 1.8.4 and earlier allows authenticated remote attackers to read arbitrar
Authenticated attackers can exploit a path traversal vulnerability in IBM Langflow Desktop 1.2.0 through 1.8.4 to write
Server-side request forgery (SSRF) in IBM Langflow Desktop 1.0.0 through 1.8.4 permits unauthenticated remote attackers
Stored cross-site scripting in IBM Langflow Desktop 1.6.0 through 1.8.4 allows authenticated users to inject arbitrary J
EUVD-2026-36254
GHSA-wvfv-3qjh-qwxj
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB