Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
ReconObtain local admin/SYSTEM on Windows host
-
DeliveryInvoke Secure Boot protection bypass
-
ExploitStage unsigned boot component
-
InstallTrigger reboot to load tampered chain
-
C2Install UEFI bootkit beneath OS
-
ExecuteDisable attestation and EDR at boot
-
ImpactMaintain stealth persistence and exfiltrate secrets
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Protection mechanism completeness
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Local code execution on the target Windows host with high privileges (Administrator or SYSTEM, per CVSS PR:H) is required, and no user interaction is needed (UI:N) - meaning the attacker must already have compromised a privileged account or process before triggering the Secure Boot bypass. Exploitation is limited by the need for that privileged foothold, by physical or logical access sufficient to cause a reboot so the tampered boot chain executes, and by the specific Windows builds enumerated in the MSRC advisory (not provided in this intelligence package and must be confirmed against the vendor guide). Environments that enforce Credential Guard, LAPS-managed local admins, and TPM-backed remote attestation materially raise the bar because they constrain the PR:H precondition and surface post-bypass tampering. |
| Impact | The CVSS vector AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N describes a locally-exploitable issue requiring an attacker who already holds high privileges (typically Administrator/SYSTEM) on a Windows host, with no user interaction. That precondition substantially limits opportunistic exploitation: this is not a remote drive-by but a post-compromise capability that lets a privileged adversary subvert the platform's root of trust to install a bootkit or persist beneath the OS. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, no CISA KEV listing, and no EPSS score was supplied, so quantitative exploitation likelihood cannot be cited; missing data includes affected Windows builds, KB numbers, CPE strings, and any vendor SSVC assessment - only a single MSRC reference is provided. Despite the high-privilege precondition, defenders running attestation, BitLocker, or Credential Guard should treat this as a meaningful integrity risk because a Secure Boot bypass can invalidate measured-boot and remote-attestation guarantees. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has already obtained Administrator/SYSTEM on a target workstation - for example via phishing followed by a UAC bypass or a stolen Tier-0 credential - invokes the vulnerable Secure Boot protection-mechanism flaw to load an unsigned or revoked boot-stage component on the next reboot. From that foothold beneath the OS they install a UEFI bootkit that survives reinstallation and disk wipes, disables endpoint telemetry before it loads, and silently exfiltrates BitLocker keys or attestation secrets. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, so this scenario is derived from the CVSS vector (AV:L/PR:H/S:C) and the CWE-693 protection-failure class rather than an observed in-the-wild chain. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jun 09, 2026
Security feature bypass in Microsoft Windows Secure Boot allows a local attacker with high privileges to defeat the platform's boot-time integrity protections, achieving cross-scope confidentiality and integrity impact on the host. The flaw is tracked under CWE-693 (Protection Mechanism Failure) and carries a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.9 with no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Because the scope is Changed (S:C), successful exploitation lets the attacker influence components outside the originally vulnerable security boundary - typically the trusted boot chain itself.
RemediationAI
Patch status is best characterized as 'Patch available per vendor advisory' based on the MSRC reference; the supplied data does not include an exact fix KB or build number, so administrators should consult https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48568 to identify the correct cumulative update for each affected Windows SKU and deploy it through WSUS, Intune, or Windows Update for Business. Because exploitation requires high local privileges, compensating controls should focus on minimizing the population of accounts that could chain this bypass: enforce LAPS for local Administrator accounts, restrict Tier-0 admin logons to Privileged Access Workstations, and require Credential Guard plus Protected Users group membership for privileged identities (trade-off: Credential Guard breaks some legacy SSO and Kerberos unconstrained-delegation scenarios). Where attestation matters, configure TPM-backed BitLocker with PCR 7 binding and enable Device Health Attestation so a successful Secure Boot bypass would surface as a failed attestation rather than going unnoticed (trade-off: PCR 7 policies can lock users out after legitimate firmware updates and require recovery-key rotation planning). Additionally, ensure the UEFI dbx revocation list is kept current via the Windows Secure Boot DBX update mechanism so that any revoked components called out in the advisory are actually blocked at boot.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 33 packages in microsoft, euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Secure Boot is a UEFI-based protection mechanism that validates the cryptographic signatures of bootloaders, the Windows kernel, and early-boot drivers against keys stored in firmware (PK, KEK, db, dbx) before allowing them to execute. CWE-693 (Protection Mechanism Failure) indicates that the control intended to enforce this validation can be circumvented rather than that a cryptographic primitive itself is broken - typical instances involve flaws in policy parsing, revocation list (dbx) handling, signature verification logic, or how Windows boot components consume Secure Boot state. The scope change (S:C) in the CVSS vector is consistent with a boot-component bypass: compromise of a privileged component on the OS side translates into impact on the firmware/boot trust boundary.
Know when Windows 10 1607 gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Protection mechanism failure in Windows Secure Boot allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.
Executive ViewAI
A security feature bypass in Microsoft Windows Secure Boot (CVE-2026-48568) allows high-privilege local attackers to defeat platform boot-time integrity protections, potentially compromising the trusted boot chain across affected systems. This vulnerability directly undermines a foundational security control that organizations rely on to prevent unauthorized system modifications and rootkit-level attacks. Leadership should prioritize assessment of administrative access controls, as successful exploitation could require expensive incident response and system remediation.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) Restrict high-privilege account access through role-based access controls and regular privilege reviews; (2) Enable and enforce Secure Boot with TPM-based measurements in BIOS/UEFI; (3) Implement comprehensive logging and alerting on boot-level events and administrative account activity; (4) Apply principle of least privilege to eliminate unnecessary local administrative access; (5) Establish change controls requiring approval and documentation for any high-privilege account activities.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Related Vulnerabilities in Windows Secure Boot Protection Bypass Flaws
View all 8More in Windows 10 1607
View allWindows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX
<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi
Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f
The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows
The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co
Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth
The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited
Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo
Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour
Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in
EUVD-2026-35521
GHSA-wm7m-2hvr-5m88
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB