Skip to main content

Ericsson Packet Core Gateway EUVDEUVD-2026-34823

| CVE-2026-25659 HIGH
Improper Handling of Missing Values (CWE-230)
2026-06-05 ERIC GHSA-pg3r-xmvg-gj6m
7.1
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: ERIC
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain adjacent-network foothold on operator signaling fabric
  2. Delivery
    Identify reachable PCG ingress interface
  3. Exploit
    Continuously send crafted message with missing required value
  4. Execution
    Trigger CWE-230 missing-value handling fault
  5. Persist
    PCG process crashes repeatedly under sustained traffic
  6. Impact
    Subscriber session signaling degraded for attack duration

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Missing parameter handling
Exploitation Conditions

Attacker must have adjacent-network access to a PCG signaling or user-plane interface (CVSS AV:A, not internet-routable) and must be able to continuously send the specially crafted message - a single packet is insufficient because impact only persists while the flood continues. No authentication is required (PR:N) and no user interaction is needed (UI:N). Exploitation is limited to PCG versions prior to 1.30, and the impact is bounded to availability (VC:N/VI:N/VA:H) with automatic recovery on attack cessation, meaning the vulnerability cannot be used for code execution, data theft, or persistence.

Impact

The CVSS 4.0 vector AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N with VC:N/VI:N/VA:H accurately frames this as a pure availability issue requiring no authentication and no user interaction, but only reachable from an adjacent network - not the open internet - which substantially narrows the realistic attacker population to those with operator-network footholds (insider, compromised peer, lawful-intercept-adjacent access, or a rogue device on the signaling fabric). There is no EPSS score, KEV listing, or public POC provided, so exploitation likelihood data is absent; the 7.1 score should be read as 'high impact within a constrained reachability envelope,' not as broadly exploitable. For a mobile operator, the impact is non-trivial since a sustained crash loop on PCG can degrade subscriber data sessions across a region, but the self-recovery behavior on attack cessation means this is service degradation rather than persistent compromise.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with access to the operator's internal signaling network - for example via a compromised adjacent network function, a misconfigured peering link, or an insider position - continuously transmits a crafted message with a required field omitted to a PCG ingress interface. The PCG process repeatedly crashes on the missing-value condition, dropping or refusing subscriber session signaling for the duration of the flood; the service recovers once the attacker stops, so the scenario is best understood as a sustained DoS rather than a one-shot kill.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jun 05, 2026

Denial of service in Ericsson Packet Core Gateway (PCG) versions prior to 1.30 allows an adjacent-network attacker to degrade telecom packet core service by continuously sending a specially crafted message that triggers improper handling of missing values (CWE-230). The condition persists only while the attack is sustained - the system self-recovers once traffic stops - and no public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the CVSS 4.0 score of 7.1 reflects high availability impact on a carrier-grade network function.

RemediationAI

Upgrade Ericsson Packet Core Gateway to version 1.30 or later, which is the vendor-released patch identified in the Ericsson PSIRT advisory at https://www.ericsson.com/en/about-us/security/psirt/cve-2026-25659. If immediate upgrade is not feasible in a maintenance window, compensating controls focus on shrinking the adjacent-network attack surface: restrict signaling and N3/N4/N6 interface reachability to known peer NF (Network Function) IP ranges via firewall ACLs at the data-center fabric, enforce IPsec/TLS mutual authentication on inter-NF traffic where supported (limits message origination to authenticated peers but adds CPU overhead), and enable rate limiting on the affected ingress interface to blunt the sustained-traffic requirement (may drop legitimate bursty signaling during peaks). Monitor PCG process restart counts and N4/PFCP error metrics as a detective control until the patch is deployed.

Affected VersionsENISA

Packet Core Gateway (PCG) 0 <1.30

Affected Packages

euvd packet_core_gateway_pcg fix: 1.30

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

PCG is Ericsson's cloud-native 5G packet core element that combines SMF (Session Management Function) and UPF (User Plane Function) roles for subscriber session handling and user-plane traffic forwarding in mobile operator networks. The root cause is CWE-230 (Improper Handling of Missing Values), meaning a parser or message handler does not safely cope with a field that is absent or null in an inbound protocol message, leading it to crash rather than reject the malformed input. Because PCG sits on the operator's signaling/transport network (consistent with the AV:A 'adjacent network' attack vector), the offending message must reach an internal control or user-plane interface rather than the public internet.

Know when Packet Core Gateway Pcg gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (ERIC) PRIMARY 7.1 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (ERIC) · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorVendor: ERIC

Attack Vector
Adjacent
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
None
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Jun 05, 2026 - 13:01 EUVD
CVSS changed
Jun 05, 2026 - 12:22 NVD
7.1 (HIGH)

DescriptionCVE.org

Ericsson Packet Core Gateway (PCG) versions prior to 1.30 contain an Improper Handling of Missing Values (CWE-230) vulnerability where an attacker continuously sending a specially crafted message can cause service degradation. The impact continues as long the attack persists but the system recovers from the crashes when the attack stops.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Ericsson Packet Core Gateway versions prior to 1.30 are vulnerable to a denial-of-service attack that can degrade critical telecom packet-processing services when targeted continuously from an adjacent network. With no vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis and CVSS 7.1 severity, organizations operating PCG infrastructure must implement immediate network-level mitigations to prevent service disruption. The risk is elevated for carriers where packet core availability is essential to service continuity.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: restrict network access to PCG interfaces via adjacent-network-boundary firewall rules, implement rate limiting for signaling messages to block sustained attack traffic, deploy real-time monitoring for malformed messages and availability degradation, and maintain failover procedures to reroute traffic if attack is detected. Built-in resilience: system automatically recovers once attack traffic ceases, limiting sustained outage duration.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.0%
Top 96% exploitable
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.0%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Controlled
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

36
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy