Skip to main content

Edimax BR-6428nC EUVDEUVD-2026-26821

| CVE-2026-7683 LOW
Command Injection (CWE-77)
2026-05-03 VulDB
2.1
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulDB
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain admin credentials or network access
  2. Delivery
    Reach router web interface
  3. Exploit
    Craft malicious WAN configuration request
  4. Execution
    Inject shell commands in pppUserName/pptpUserName
  5. Impact
    Execute arbitrary commands on router

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Command injection prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires valid router administrator authentication credentials (not default/unauthenticated access). The attacker must be able to reach the router's web interface over the network (HTTP/HTTPS on port 80/443, or custom ports if configured). The /goform/setWAN endpoint must be accessible in the router's web interface, which is enabled by default. No special router configuration is required beyond normal operation; the vulnerability is present in the default configuration of affected versions. Exploitation is limited by the authentication requirement-attackers cannot exploit this from the public internet unless they first obtain valid admin credentials through phishing, credential stuffing, default credentials, or local network access. The command execution context is not confirmed; the low CVSS impact scores (VC:L/VI:L/VA:L) suggest the executed commands may run in a restricted shell or non-root context, limiting the practical impact despite successful code execution.

Impact

Despite a low CVSS score of 2.1, this vulnerability presents moderate operational risk for affected deployments. The CVSS vector shows attack complexity is low (AC:L) and exploitability is probable (E:P), with public exploit code available, elevating practical threat above the numerical score. However, exploitation requires prior authentication (PR:L), significantly limiting attack surface-only users with valid router credentials can trigger the vulnerability. The impact is limited to low confidentiality, integrity, and availability per the vector (VC:L/VI:L/VA:L), suggesting command execution is restricted (possibly to non-root contexts or limited shell access). The critical mismatch between low CVSS and the severity of command injection suggests either: (1) execution context is unprivileged, or (2) the router's architecture limits the scope of commands. Verification with the vendor would clarify. For organizations operating this router in isolated networks or with strong admin credential controls, risk is manageable; for devices exposed to untrusted users or with weak credentials, risk is significant. The vendor's non-response and lack of patched firmware versions mean no official remediation path exists.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An authenticated attacker with router admin credentials crafts an HTTP POST request to /goform/setWAN with a malicious pppUserName parameter containing shell metacharacters and command sequences (e.g., 'user; rm -rf /', or backtick-enclosed commands). The vulnerable endpoint passes this unsanitized string to a shell command invoked during WAN configuration, executing the injected commands with the privileges of the router's web service process. A POC demonstrating this attack is publicly available on the researcher's Notion page.

Monitor Track and reassess. Why: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9).
No patch listed yet 0.7% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – May 03, 2026

Command injection in Edimax BR-6428nC router web interface through the /goform/setWAN endpoint allows authenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via unsanitized pppUserName or pptpUserName parameters. Affected firmware versions up to 1.16 contain this vulnerability; publicly available exploit code exists. The vendor was contacted but did not respond, indicating no security fix is anticipated.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch is available; the manufacturer did not respond to disclosure. Immediate mitigations include: (1) Restrict access to the router's web interface via firewall rules, allowing only trusted management networks to reach ports 80/443; (2) Enforce strong, unique administrator credentials and change default passwords immediately; (3) Disable remote management features (disable WAN-side access to the web interface) if the router supports this configuration option; (4) Segment the router on a separate management network isolated from untrusted user traffic; (5) Monitor router logs for suspicious /goform/setWAN requests with special characters in parameters. If the router is critical and replacement is feasible, migrate to an alternative vendor with active security support. Each mitigation trades convenience for security-restricting access impacts remote troubleshooting, and disabling features reduces functionality.

Affected VersionsENISA

BR-6428nC 1.6
BR-6428nC 1.3
BR-6428nC 1.16
BR-6428nC 1.2
BR-6428nC 1.14
BR-6428nC 1.12
BR-6428nC 1.1
BR-6428nC 1.5
BR-6428nC 1.13
BR-6428nC 1.9
BR-6428nC 1.0
BR-6428nC 1.8
BR-6428nC 1.11
BR-6428nC 1.15
BR-6428nC 1.4
BR-6428nC 1.10
BR-6428nC 1.7

Affected Packages

euvd br_6428nc no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The Edimax BR-6428nC is a wireless router whose web-based management interface processes WAN configuration parameters through the /goform/setWAN endpoint. The vulnerability stems from CWE-77 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command), where user-supplied input in the pppUserName and pptpUserName parameters is passed unsanitized to shell commands, likely during PPP or PPTP connection configuration. The web interface fails to properly escape or validate these parameters before using them in system-level operations, permitting command injection via shell metacharacters.

Know when Br 6428Nc gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulDB) PRIMARY 2.1 LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Primary rating from Vendor (VulDB) · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorVendor: VulDB

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
Low
Vulnerable system: Integrity
Low
Vulnerable system: Availability
Low
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

4
Severity Changed
May 03, 2026 - 07:22 NVD
MEDIUM LOW
CVSS changed
May 03, 2026 - 07:22 NVD
6.3 (MEDIUM) 2.1 (LOW)
PoC Detected
May 03, 2026 - 07:16 vuln.today
Public exploit code
CVE Published
May 03, 2026 - 06:30 nvd
LOW 2.1

DescriptionCVE.org

A weakness has been identified in Edimax BR-6428nC up to 1.16. This affects an unknown function of the file /goform/setWAN of the component Web Interface. This manipulation of the argument pppUserName/pptpUserName causes command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.7%
Top 27% exploitable
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity LOW
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 0.7%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Low
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

31
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +10
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy