Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain shared read-only report token
-
DeliveryReach monitoring API over network
-
ExploitSubmit alert create/modify/delete request
-
ExecutionAuthorization check fails to enforce read-only scope
-
ImpactTamper with monitoring alerts
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization logic validation
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to already possess a valid AxxonNet 'shared report token' that was issued for read-only report access, and network reachability to the Health Monitoring service's monitoring API on an instance running a version before 3.28.0 on Linux. The flaw is that this read-only-scoped token is incorrectly accepted for write operations (create/modify/delete alerts). Limiting factors: the attacker cannot act fully unauthenticated - a valid shared token is a hard prerequisite (PR:L); impact is confined to monitoring alert data (no confidentiality loss and no system-level code execution), so the realistic risk is suppression or forgery of health alerts rather than full compromise. |
| Impact | This is a medium-severity authorization flaw, not a high-priority emergency. The vendor-supplied CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L) scores 5.3 and is internally consistent with the description: network-reachable, low attack complexity, requires a low-privilege credential (the shared read-only report token, hence PR:L not PR:N), no user interaction, no confidentiality loss, and only limited integrity/availability impact (VI:L/VA:L) because the attacker can tamper with monitoring alerts rather than the underlying system. The decision signals point to moderate urgency: the vuln.today priority label is 'this_month', not act_now or emergency. There is no EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no PoC/exploit reference in the input, so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis'. SSVC-style reasoning supports de-escalation: exploitation is not observed, technical impact is partial (alert integrity only, no code execution or data disclosure), and the precondition of already holding a valid shared token limits the attacker population to those who have been granted read-only report access. The main real-world concern is a confidentiality-of-alerting failure: an attacker who legitimately or illicitly obtained a read-only token can blind or spoof the Health Monitoring alert channel, which has security-operations consequences disproportionate to the raw score. No conflicting signals were found between the vector and the description. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has obtained a shared report token for AxxonNet - a token intended only for read-only viewing of monitoring reports - sends crafted requests to the Health Monitoring monitoring API. Because the service checks authentication but not that the token is read-only, the attacker creates, alters, or deletes monitoring alerts, potentially suppressing alerts for real incidents or injecting false ones. No public exploit code or PoC reference is provided in the available sources. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Nov 03, 2026
Incorrect authorization in the Health Monitoring service of AxxonSoft AxxonNet on Linux (versions before 3.28.0) lets a remote attacker who already holds a shared report token - a credential intended only for read-only report access - create, modify, or delete monitoring alerts through the monitoring API. The flaw is a scope-enforcement failure rather than an authentication bypass in the strict sense: a valid low-privilege token is a hard prerequisite (PR:L, AV:N), and the resulting impact is limited to alert integrity and availability, with no confidentiality loss and no path to code execution. Severity is medium (CVSS 4.0 base 5.3; independently assessed CVSS 3.1 5.3, S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L); there is no CISA KEV listing and no public exploit identified at time of analysis, so the practical risk is suppression or forgery of health alerts by someone who already has report-level access.
RemediationAI
Upgrade AxxonNet on Linux to version 3.28.0 or later, which is the fixed release named in the vendor advisory (https://www.axxonsoft.com/legal/axxonsoft-vulnerability-disclosure-policy/security-advisories#CVE-2026-121024); prioritizing per the "this_month" decision label, the upgrade should be scheduled within the current patch cycle rather than treated as an emergency, since exploitation requires an already-issued shared report token and impact is limited to alert data. Because token possession is the exploitation prerequisite, organizations that cannot upgrade immediately should, as a precaution, inventory and rotate shared report tokens issued for read-only report access and narrow distribution of those tokens to the parties that genuinely need report visibility - the trade-off is that reports shared with external stakeholders will need to be reissued. Restricting network reachability to the monitoring API (for example, limiting which hosts can reach the Health Monitoring service) reduces the attack surface, but the cost is loss of remote health-monitoring integration from excluded segments. No vendor-published workaround is listed in the supplied references, and the availability of fixes for non-Linux builds is not confirmed by the available data.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
AxxonNet is AxxonSoft's video-surveillance and physical-security management platform; this issue sits in its Health Monitoring service, which exposes a monitoring API for managing system health alerts. The root cause class is CWE-863 (Incorrect Authorization): the service fails to validate the privilege scope bound to the presented credential, so a shared report token issued for read-only report access is incorrectly accepted on write endpoints used to create, modify, and delete alerts. In other words, the token is authenticated but the authorization check does not distinguish read scope from write scope - the specific code path and the exact validation routine are not described in the available sources. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N, VC:N/VI:L/VA:L, all subsequent-threat and environmental metrics not defined) and the independently assessed CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L) agree on the essentials: network-reachable, low attack complexity, no user interaction, privileges required, and impact confined to integrity and availability of monitoring data. The CPE entry cpe:2.3:a:axxonsoft:axxonnet:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* is version-agnostic, so the authoritative boundary is the advisory statement of "before 3.28.0" on Linux; exposure on non-Linux deployments is not confirmed by the available data.
Know when Axxonnet gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Network API reachable with a valid but read-only token so PR:L and AC:L; attacker can alter/delete alerts giving limited integrity and availability impact and no confidentiality impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (AxxonSoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: AxxonSoft
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in the Health Monitoring service in AxxonSoft AxxonNet before 3.28.0 on Linux allows a remote attacker in possession of a shared report token, which is intended for read-only access, to create, modify or delete monitoring alerts via the monitoring API.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
EUVD-2026-115711
GHSA-jmww-h2pp-r5r5
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Exploit-DB