Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate to HyperCloud management plane
-
DeliveryInject shell payload into VM template DESCRIPTION
-
ExploitTrigger VM lifecycle operation (deploy/migrate)
-
ExecutionUnquoted here-doc expands payload on host
-
ImpactExecute commands as privileged orchestration user
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires all of: valid credentials, access to the HyperCloud management plane (the vendor explicitly states that merely owning a virtual machine is NOT sufficient), attacker-controlled template content such as the VM DESCRIPTION field, and a VM lifecycle operation (deploy, migrate, or network setup) that actually reaches the affected hypervisor host. The flaw is in the Orchestrator component delivering that content to hosts via a here-document whose terminator is not quoted. Limiting factors that reduce real-world risk: the attacker must already be an authenticated management-plane user (PR:L), reach the management plane over an adjacent network rather than remotely (AV:A), and a qualifying lifecycle operation must occur (UI:R). Only versions 1.0 through 2.6.17 are affected; 2.6.18 fixes it, and the vendor presents upgrading as the remediation. |
| Impact | This is a genuine but access-gated privilege-escalation-to-host-takeover issue, not an internet-facing mass-exploitation threat. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.4 (AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) reflects full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact (arbitrary OS command execution as the privileged orchestration user on hypervisor hosts) but is held down by three real barriers: adjacent-network rather than remote reach (AV:A), required authentication (PR:L), and required user interaction (UI:R, i.e. a VM lifecycle operation must occur). The vuln.today decision label is 'this_week', consistent with a serious issue that is not an active-exploitation emergency. No EPSS score is present in the input, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified. KEV status is not indicated, so there is no public evidence of active exploitation, and no proof-of-concept or exploit reference is present - only a vendor advisory landing page. An SSVC decision set (automatable, exploitation, technical impact) was not supplied, so those dimensions cannot be weighed. Net: treat as a priority internal patch (full host compromise and tenant-isolation break are possible), but the multiple prerequisites make it targeted/insider-leaning rather than widespread. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An authenticated user with access to the HyperCloud management plane crafts a virtual machine template whose DESCRIPTION field contains shell metacharacters or a here-document terminator sequence. When a VM lifecycle operation (deploy, migrate, or network setup) propagates that template content to a hypervisor host through an unquoted here-document, the injected content is expanded and executed, running arbitrary OS commands on the host as the privileged orchestration user. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; the only listed reference is the SoftIron vendor advisory. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 31, 2026
SoftIron HyperCloud Orchestrator versions 1.0 through 2.6.17 allow an authenticated user with management-plane access to inject shell content through virtual machine template fields such as the VM DESCRIPTION, resulting in arbitrary operating system command execution on hypervisor hosts as the privileged orchestration user during deploy, migrate, or network setup operations. Exploitation is access-gated: it requires valid credentials, adjacent-network access to the management plane, and a qualifying VM lifecycle operation, and merely owning a virtual machine is not sufficient. No public exploit was identified at time of analysis, and the vendor-released fix is version 2.6.18.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: 2.6.18. Upgrade SoftIron HyperCloud to 2.6.18 to remediate CVE-2026-116755; the vendor presents upgrading as the remediation and the advisory is at https://advisories.softiron.cloud/. The available data does not provide a vendor-documented workaround, so exposure reduction depends on the existing prerequisites: valid management-plane credentials, adjacent-network access to the management plane, and a qualifying VM lifecycle operation reaching the affected hypervisor host.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The issue is CWE-78 command injection in the Orchestrator component of SoftIron HyperCloud. Attacker-controlled virtual machine template content, for example the VM DESCRIPTION field, is delivered to hypervisor hosts through a shell here-document whose terminator is not quoted, allowing shell expansion and here-document terminator injection on that content during virtual machine lifecycle operations such as deploy, migrate, and network setup. The supplied CPE cpe:2.3:a:softiron:hypercloud:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* identifies the affected product but does not encode the version boundary; the advisory text states that versions 1.0 through 2.6.17 are affected and 2.6.18 is fixed. The assessed CVSS vector is CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, meaning the attacker must already be authenticated and able to reach the management plane over an adjacent network, with the required lifecycle operation represented by UI:R. Trigger details beyond those lifecycle operations are not described in the available sources.
Know when Hypercloud gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Management-plane (adjacent) access and authentication give AV:A/PR:L; a lifecycle operation must occur (UI:R); command execution as the privileged orchestration user yields C:H/I:H/A:H.
Primary rating from Vendor (SoftIron).
CVSS VectorVendor: SoftIron
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') in the Orchestrator component of SoftIron HyperCloud allows an authenticated user with access to the management plane to execute arbitrary operating system commands on hypervisor hosts as the privileged orchestration user. Attacker-controlled virtual machine template content (for example, the VM DESCRIPTION field) is delivered to hosts through a shell here-document whose terminator is not quoted, so shell expansion and here-document terminator injection are performed on that content during virtual machine lifecycle operations such as deploy, migrate, and network setup. Exploitation requires valid credentials, access to the management plane (owning a virtual machine alone is not sufficient), and a lifecycle operation that reaches the affected host. This issue affects the Orchestrator component of SoftIron HyperCloud from 1.0 through 2.6.17 and is fixed in 2.6.18.
Executive ViewAI
SoftIron HyperCloud Orchestrator (versions 1.0 through 2.6.17) contains a high-severity authenticated command injection vulnerability that allows a management-plane user to execute arbitrary commands on hypervisor hosts as the privileged orchestration user. This flaw compromises the integrity and availability of the virtualization infrastructure, potentially impacting all hosted workloads and sensitive data. While exploitation requires valid credentials and specific conditions, the potential for lateral movement and full environment compromise makes this a priority for security leadership.
Apply vendor patch (upgrade to version 2.6.18 or later).
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.
More in Hypercloud
View allAn issue exists in SoftIron HyperCloud where drive caddy removal and reinsertion without a reboot may erroneously cause
An Improper Privilege Management vulnerability exists in HyperCloud that will impact the ability for a user to authentic
An issue exists in SoftIron HyperCloud where compute nodes may come online immediately without following the correct ini
EUVD-2026-114571
GHSA-qhpq-4pf4-cqxv
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
VulDB
Exploit-DB