Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach WolfProt service over network
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted command-injection payload
  3. Exploit
    Insufficient input neutralization triggers injection
  4. Execution
    Execute OS commands as service
  5. Impact
    Full control of affected impact

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

No special conditions beyond network reachability - remote unauthenticated command injection against the WolfProt interface of affected WolfVision Cynap devices (per AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N and the vendor description of an unauthenticated network attacker). The practical limiting factor is network exposure of the WolfProt service: the device must be reachable by the attacker (for example on a management or meeting-room network), so devices not exposed to attacker-reachable networks are not exploitable. The available sources do not state a required non-default configuration or feature flag, and the specific input field or WolfProt command carrying the injection is not described in the supplied data.

Impact

Multiple signals align toward genuine high priority. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N) describes remote, low-complexity, unauthenticated exploitation requiring no user interaction, and the high vulnerable-system impact (VC:H/VI:H/VA:H) is consistent with CWE-78 OS command injection yielding full command execution at the service's privilege level. The vuln.today Decision label is 'act_now', and the issue was reported by ENISA, lending institutional weight to the assessment. These severity and decision signals reinforce each other. However, several exploitation-maturity signals are absent from the input: there is no CISA KEV entry, no EPSS probability, and no PoC or exploit reference - therefore this is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis', and active exploitation cannot be claimed. The net picture is a credible, easily exploitable unauthenticated RCE on a specialist AV appliance whose real-world mass-exploitation likelihood is unquantified because EPSS is missing; the 'act_now' label here reflects intrinsic severity and unauthenticated network reach rather than observed in-the-wild activity. No conflict exists between the CVSS vector and the description - both describe unauthenticated network command execution.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with network access to a reachable WolfVision Cynap device sends crafted input to the WolfProt control interface that is insufficiently neutralized, causing the device to execute attacker-supplied operating-system commands as the affected application service. Because no authentication or user interaction is required (PR:N/UI:N) and complexity is low (AC:L), any attacker able to reach the service port can attempt this directly. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, so exploitation would require the attacker to craft the injection themselves.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
Patch available 0.5% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 26, 2026

Unauthenticated OS command injection in the WolfProt interface of WolfVision Cynap collaboration devices allows a remote attacker who can reach the service to run arbitrary operating-system commands at the privilege level of the Cynap application service. The flaw is rated 9.3 (CVSS 4.0: AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N, with high confidentiality, integrity and availability impact) and maps to CWE-78; the vulnerable surface spans the Cynap, Cynap Core, Cynap Core Pro, Cynap Pro, Cynap Pure, Cynap Pure Mini, Cynap Pure Pro, Cynap Pure Next Gen, Cynap Pure SDM, Cynap Receiver, Cynap Bridge and Cynap Videobar firmware lines. Per the supplied intelligence the decision is act_now; no public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation were reported in the available data. The practical exposure gate is network reachability of the WolfProt service, so devices reachable from management or meeting-room networks carry the most risk.

RemediationAI

No fixed firmware version is listed in the supplied data, so the authoritative source for patched releases is the WolfVision security advisory at https://wolfvision.com/de/security/cve-2026-59106-2; check it for the firmware build per Cynap model (Cynap, Cynap Core, Cynap Core Pro, Cynap Pro, Cynap Pure, Cynap Pure Mini, Cynap Pure Pro, Cynap Pure Next Gen, Cynap Pure SDM, Cynap Receiver, Cynap Bridge, Cynap Videobar) and apply that build as the primary fix. Because exploitation requires only network reachability of the WolfProt service and no credentials, the effective interim control is to restrict that reachability: place affected Cynap devices behind network segmentation or firewall rules that permit WolfProt traffic only from trusted management hosts and VLANs, and remove any direct internet or guest-network exposure of the interface. The trade-off is that tightening access to WolfProt breaks management, monitoring and third-party control integrations that depend on the interface from hosts outside the allow-list, so inventory those integrations before filtering. Until a fixed build is confirmed and deployed, treat any Cynap device reachable from an untrusted segment as potentially compromised and review it for unexpected command execution artifacts, since the injected commands run with the privileges of the Cynap application service.

Affected VersionsENISA

Cynap, Cynap Core, Cynap Pure SDM 0
Cynap Videobar, Firmware Version 0 <1.72e
Cynap Pure (Next Gen), Cynap Bridge 0 <2.00c
Cynap Pro, Cynap Core Pro, Cynap Receiver, Cynap Pure, Cynap Pure Mini, Cynap Pure Pro 0 <1.78a

Affected Packages

euvd cynap_pro_cynap_core_pro_cynap_receiver_cynap_pure_cynap_pure_mini_cynap_pure_pro fix: 1.78a
euvd cynap_pure_next_gen_cynap_bridge fix: 2.00c
euvd cynap_videobar_firmware_version fix: 1.72e

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 3 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

WolfVision Cynap devices are networked presentation and collaboration systems that expose the proprietary WolfProt interface for control and integration. The root cause is CWE-78 (improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command): user-controlled input reaching the WolfProt implementation is not adequately sanitized before being used in operating-system command execution, which lets a remote party pass crafted input that the underlying OS interprets as commands. The CVSS 4.0 vector describes a network-reachable, low-complexity, no-prerequisites attack requiring no privileges and no user interaction, with high impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability and no scope change, meaning the injected commands land with the privileges of the affected application service rather than crossing a security boundary. The supplied sources do not describe which WolfProt endpoint, parameter or command carries the injection, nor whether any non-default configuration or feature flag is required; the trigger itself is not described in the available sources beyond the general unauthenticated network-command-execution characteristic.

Know when Cynap Pure Next Gen Cynap Bridge gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (ENISA) PRIMARY 9.3 CRITICAL
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 9.8 CRITICAL

Unauthenticated network command injection with no user interaction (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) grants OS command execution at service level, giving full C/I/A impact with unchanged scope.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (ENISA).

CVSS VectorVendor: ENISA

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 26, 2026 - 15:17 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 26, 2026 - 13:15 cve.org
CRITICAL 9.3

DescriptionCVE.org

A security vulnerability has been identified in the WolfProt interface implementation. Insufficient neutralization of user-controlled input could allow an unauthenticated attacker with network access to a vulnerable service to execute operating-system commands with the privileges of the affected application service.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

CVE-2026-59106 is a critical unauthenticated command injection flaw in the WolfProt interface of WolfVision Cynap collaboration devices, allowing remote attackers with network access to execute arbitrary OS commands. This affects a broad range of Cynap firmware lines deployed in meeting rooms and management networks, potentially compromising confidentiality, integrity, and availability. With no vendor patch available, leadership should prioritize mitigating exposure through network controls, as these devices are often internet-accessible in conference environments.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Implement network segmentation and firewall rules to restrict access to the WolfProt service to trusted management networks only. Enforce strong authentication and monitoring for anomalous activity on Cynap devices. Isolate devices from sensitive network segments and apply least-privilege principles to the application service account.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.5%
Top 54% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche AV vendor appliance (WolfVision Cynap), mainly meeting-room/education deployments
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.5%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

47
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +46
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy