Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessReach WolfProt service over network
-
DeliverySend crafted command-injection payload
-
ExploitInsufficient input neutralization triggers injection
-
ExecutionExecute OS commands as service
-
ImpactFull control of affected impact
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | No special conditions beyond network reachability - remote unauthenticated command injection against the WolfProt interface of affected WolfVision Cynap devices (per AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N and the vendor description of an unauthenticated network attacker). The practical limiting factor is network exposure of the WolfProt service: the device must be reachable by the attacker (for example on a management or meeting-room network), so devices not exposed to attacker-reachable networks are not exploitable. The available sources do not state a required non-default configuration or feature flag, and the specific input field or WolfProt command carrying the injection is not described in the supplied data. |
| Impact | Multiple signals align toward genuine high priority. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N) describes remote, low-complexity, unauthenticated exploitation requiring no user interaction, and the high vulnerable-system impact (VC:H/VI:H/VA:H) is consistent with CWE-78 OS command injection yielding full command execution at the service's privilege level. The vuln.today Decision label is 'act_now', and the issue was reported by ENISA, lending institutional weight to the assessment. These severity and decision signals reinforce each other. However, several exploitation-maturity signals are absent from the input: there is no CISA KEV entry, no EPSS probability, and no PoC or exploit reference - therefore this is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis', and active exploitation cannot be claimed. The net picture is a credible, easily exploitable unauthenticated RCE on a specialist AV appliance whose real-world mass-exploitation likelihood is unquantified because EPSS is missing; the 'act_now' label here reflects intrinsic severity and unauthenticated network reach rather than observed in-the-wild activity. No conflict exists between the CVSS vector and the description - both describe unauthenticated network command execution. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with network access to a reachable WolfVision Cynap device sends crafted input to the WolfProt control interface that is insufficiently neutralized, causing the device to execute attacker-supplied operating-system commands as the affected application service. Because no authentication or user interaction is required (PR:N/UI:N) and complexity is low (AC:L), any attacker able to reach the service port can attempt this directly. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, so exploitation would require the attacker to craft the injection themselves. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 26, 2026
Unauthenticated OS command injection in the WolfProt interface of WolfVision Cynap collaboration devices allows a remote attacker who can reach the service to run arbitrary operating-system commands at the privilege level of the Cynap application service. The flaw is rated 9.3 (CVSS 4.0: AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N, with high confidentiality, integrity and availability impact) and maps to CWE-78; the vulnerable surface spans the Cynap, Cynap Core, Cynap Core Pro, Cynap Pro, Cynap Pure, Cynap Pure Mini, Cynap Pure Pro, Cynap Pure Next Gen, Cynap Pure SDM, Cynap Receiver, Cynap Bridge and Cynap Videobar firmware lines. Per the supplied intelligence the decision is act_now; no public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation were reported in the available data. The practical exposure gate is network reachability of the WolfProt service, so devices reachable from management or meeting-room networks carry the most risk.
RemediationAI
No fixed firmware version is listed in the supplied data, so the authoritative source for patched releases is the WolfVision security advisory at https://wolfvision.com/de/security/cve-2026-59106-2; check it for the firmware build per Cynap model (Cynap, Cynap Core, Cynap Core Pro, Cynap Pro, Cynap Pure, Cynap Pure Mini, Cynap Pure Pro, Cynap Pure Next Gen, Cynap Pure SDM, Cynap Receiver, Cynap Bridge, Cynap Videobar) and apply that build as the primary fix. Because exploitation requires only network reachability of the WolfProt service and no credentials, the effective interim control is to restrict that reachability: place affected Cynap devices behind network segmentation or firewall rules that permit WolfProt traffic only from trusted management hosts and VLANs, and remove any direct internet or guest-network exposure of the interface. The trade-off is that tightening access to WolfProt breaks management, monitoring and third-party control integrations that depend on the interface from hosts outside the allow-list, so inventory those integrations before filtering. Until a fixed build is confirmed and deployed, treat any Cynap device reachable from an untrusted segment as potentially compromised and review it for unexpected command execution artifacts, since the injected commands run with the privileges of the Cynap application service.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 3 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
WolfVision Cynap devices are networked presentation and collaboration systems that expose the proprietary WolfProt interface for control and integration. The root cause is CWE-78 (improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command): user-controlled input reaching the WolfProt implementation is not adequately sanitized before being used in operating-system command execution, which lets a remote party pass crafted input that the underlying OS interprets as commands. The CVSS 4.0 vector describes a network-reachable, low-complexity, no-prerequisites attack requiring no privileges and no user interaction, with high impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability and no scope change, meaning the injected commands land with the privileges of the affected application service rather than crossing a security boundary. The supplied sources do not describe which WolfProt endpoint, parameter or command carries the injection, nor whether any non-default configuration or feature flag is required; the trigger itself is not described in the available sources beyond the general unauthenticated network-command-execution characteristic.
Know when Cynap Pure Next Gen Cynap Bridge gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Unauthenticated network command injection with no user interaction (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) grants OS command execution at service level, giving full C/I/A impact with unchanged scope.
Primary rating from Vendor (ENISA).
CVSS VectorVendor: ENISA
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
A security vulnerability has been identified in the WolfProt interface implementation. Insufficient neutralization of user-controlled input could allow an unauthenticated attacker with network access to a vulnerable service to execute operating-system commands with the privileges of the affected application service.
Executive ViewAI
CVE-2026-59106 is a critical unauthenticated command injection flaw in the WolfProt interface of WolfVision Cynap collaboration devices, allowing remote attackers with network access to execute arbitrary OS commands. This affects a broad range of Cynap firmware lines deployed in meeting rooms and management networks, potentially compromising confidentiality, integrity, and availability. With no vendor patch available, leadership should prioritize mitigating exposure through network controls, as these devices are often internet-accessible in conference environments.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Implement network segmentation and firewall rules to restrict access to the WolfProt service to trusted management networks only. Enforce strong authentication and monitoring for anomalous activity on Cynap devices. Isolate devices from sensitive network segments and apply least-privilege principles to the application service account.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.
Unauthenticated information exposure in WOLFVISON Cynap collaboration and presentation devices allows anyone who can rea
Stored cross-site scripting in the web interface of WolfVision Cynap collaboration devices allows an attacker who can in
EUVD-2026-109816
GHSA-rwp5-547m-r274
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB