Skip to main content

Linux EUVDEUVD-2026-108763

| CVE-2026-98969
2026-10-23 Linux GHSA-g75r-rwjf-jp26
View
Monitor Track and reassess. Why: No CVSS yet + weak signal (CWE or non-zero EPSS).
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisCVE.org

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/sched: em_text: reject unterminated algo before autoload

This is a follow-up to commit 9c572a83037a ("net/sched: fix potential stack infoleak in em_text_dump()"), which zero-initialised the dump-side struct. Sashiko pointed at a pre-existing bug that exposed the change-side input-validation gap open.

em_text_change() casts the raw netlink attribute payload to struct tcf_em_text and passes conf->algo, a 16-byte array with no enforced NUL terminator, to textsearch_prepare(). On the TS_AUTOLOAD retry textsearch_prepare() calls request_module("ts_%s", algo); vsnprintf() walks %s until it finds a NUL, so an algo[] with no NUL reads past the array into the adjacent struct fields and payload and feeds those bytes to the usermode helper command line. This is an out-of-bounds read and a kernel memory disclosure.

Reject the attribute when no NUL exists within TC_EM_TEXT_ALGOSIZ bytes, matching the check xt_string has had since 3ab720881b6e.

Conditions to recreate the bug:

  • CAP_NET_ADMIN on the target netns (namespace-local via unshare -Urn

is enough)

  • install clsact on an interface, then add a basic filter with one text

ematch whose algo[] is 16 bytes with no NUL (e.g. "A"*16) and pattern_len at least 1

  • the add fails with -ENOENT and the kernel invokes modprobe with a

module name made of "ts_" plus the 16 bytes and the adjacent payload

Affected VersionsENISA

Linux patch: 6.6.160
Linux patch: 7.2.11
Linux d675c989ed2d4ba23dff615330b04371aea83534 <b627c6ba20be20334338229b4820baacb9d96826
Linux d675c989ed2d4ba23dff615330b04371aea83534 <00bcc303000bac524d62eed054d77372b38ace0f
Linux 2.6.13
Linux d675c989ed2d4ba23dff615330b04371aea83534 <c9728fcf2e7fb4a7a8d08ebd9524c3b02ae1a021
Linux d675c989ed2d4ba23dff615330b04371aea83534 <22182f91c6703af6e9832cffe6d22b381031cb5a
Linux patch: 6.12.113
Linux patch: 7.3
Linux patch: 0
Linux patch: 6.18.57
Linux d675c989ed2d4ba23dff615330b04371aea83534 <85e5512369d4fe6e5f2c43712d9f9e01d4ae8437

Affected Packages

euvd linux no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 23, 2026 - 13:17 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 23, 2026 - 12:19 cve.org
UNKNOWN (no severity yet)

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 89% exploitable
Data Quality
3 sources
Confidence: Low

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity Not scored yet
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
No CVSS yet + weak signal (CWE or non-zero EPSS)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy