Skip to main content

SLiMS 9 Bulian EUVDEUVD-2026-104552

| CVE-2026-107084 HIGH
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) (CWE-352)
2026-10-19 mitre GHSA-2h92-7h5x-98h5
8.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: mitre
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Lure authenticated SLiMS admin to page
  2. Exploit
    Browser auto-sends forged action=run GET
  3. Execution
    Server performs privileged operation under admin session
  4. Impact
    Loan history records deleted

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V3 - Web Frontend Security Anti-CSRF tokens, SameSite cookies
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Initial Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires a victim who is an authenticated SLiMS administrator with an active session to be tricked into loading attacker-controlled content that issues admin/modules/circulation/loan_history_maintenance.php?action=run. The specific enabling weakness is that this administrative, destructive endpoint accepts the action via a GET request with no anti-CSRF token and no POST confirmation step, so any cross-site request carrying the admin's session cookie succeeds. Limiting factors: exploitation is impossible without an authenticated admin performing the user interaction (UI:R), so it cannot be fully automated or run unattended; it also depends on the admin session being active in the same browser when the forged request fires.

Impact

The input CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, score 8.8) is the main severity signal, but it overstates real-world risk for a CSRF flaw. Attack vector is network and complexity low, and PR:N reflects that the attacker themselves needs no credentials, but UI:R is load-bearing here: exploitation requires an already-authenticated SLiMS administrator to be lured into triggering the malicious action=run GET request. The supplied C:H is questionable for classic CSRF because the attacker cannot read the cross-origin response - the realistic impact is destructive (deletion/loss of loan history records), i.e. integrity/availability of that data, not confidentiality disclosure; verify the confidentiality rating with the reporter. EPSS is low at 0.20% (9th percentile) and there is no CISA KEV listing, so there is no evidence of active or widespread exploitation. A public PoC reference exists (github.com/Primandito/CVE-2026-107084) but is not verified as working exploit code. No SSVC automatable/technical-impact decision values were provided; the only decision signal is the vuln.today 'this_week' priority. Net: a genuine, straightforwardly-triggered CSRF worth patching on a normal (this-week) cadence rather than an emergency - the high CVSS is tempered by the required admin interaction, the low EPSS, the absence of KEV, and the niche deployment footprint of the product.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker hosts a web page (or sends an email/link) containing an auto-loading image or redirect pointing at admin/modules/circulation/loan_history_maintenance.php?action=run on a target SLiMS install. When a logged-in SLiMS administrator visits that page, their browser silently replays the request with their session cookie, executing the privileged destructive operation and wiping loan history records. A public PoC reference exists but is not verified as working exploit code; exploitation is gated on tricking an authenticated admin into visiting the attacker's content.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 28, 2026

Cross-site request forgery in SLiMS 9 Bulian 9.8.0 allows a remote attacker to trick a logged-in administrator into issuing a GET request to admin/modules/circulation/loan_history_maintenance.php?action=run, which deletes loan history records. The endpoint lacks a CSRF token and POST confirmation, so the forged request executes with the administrator's privileges; the assessed impact is integrity-only (C:N/I:H/A:N), not confidentiality or availability. Exploitation requires an active admin session and user interaction (UI:R); a public PoC reference exists but is not verified as working exploit code, and EPSS is low at 0.20% (9th percentile).

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch is identified in the available data; track https://github.com/slims/slims9_bulian/issues/394 and https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-107084 for a fixed release. The evidence does not list a vendor workaround. Because the flaw is the absence of a CSRF token and POST confirmation on admin/modules/circulation/loan_history_maintenance.php?action=run, a complete fix requires adding an anti-CSRF token and requiring POST for that action. Until a patched release exists, exposure is reduced by keeping the SLiMS admin interface off untrusted networks and having administrators avoid browsing untrusted sites while logged in; this lowers, but does not remove, the UI:R attack path.

Affected VersionsENISA

n/a n/a

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

SLiMS (Senayan Library Management Systems) is a PHP-based library management application, and the vulnerable module is an administrative circulation loan-history maintenance script. CWE-352 (CSRF) arises because action=run is accepted as a GET parameter without an anti-CSRF token or POST confirmation, letting a cross-site request carrying the admin's session cookie trigger a state-changing, destructive operation. The supplied CVSS vector uses AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U, meaning the attacker is unauthenticated but the victim must interact; the independent assessment revises impact to C:N/I:H/A:N, reflecting deletion of loan-history records rather than disclosure or denial of service. The supplied CPE (cpe:2.3:a:n/a:n/a:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) is n/a and does not independently confirm the product or version. EPSS 0.20% (9th percentile) indicates low predicted exploitation.

Know when PHP gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (mitre) PRIMARY 8.8 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 6.5 MEDIUM

CSRF cannot read the response so C:N; forged action destructively deletes loan history records giving I:H; service stays up so A:N; UI:R because an authenticated admin must trigger the request.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (mitre).

CVSS VectorVendor: mitre

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

3
CVSS changed
Oct 26, 2026 - 20:22 NVD
8.8 (HIGH)
CVE Published
Oct 19, 2026 - 00:00 cve.org
UNKNOWN (no severity yet)
CVE Published
Oct 19, 2026 - 00:00 cve.org
HIGH 8.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Slims (Senayan Library Management Systems) 9 Bulian 9.8.0 allows cross-site request forgery (CSRF) against admin/modules/circulation/loan_history_maintenance.php because the action=run GET parameter performs privileged, destructive operations with no CSRF token or POST confirmation, leading to data loss of loan history records.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

SLiMS 9 Bulian 9.8.0, a library management system, contains a high-severity cross-site request forgery vulnerability that could allow an attacker to trick a logged-in administrator into deleting loan history records. This integrity-only flaw affects library operations and record-keeping, but does not compromise confidentiality or system availability. Leadership should prioritize remediation given the potential for data loss and operational disruption.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor patch is available. Interim mitigations include enforcing CSRF tokens and POST confirmation on the vulnerable endpoint, restricting administrative access to trusted networks, and conducting awareness training for administrators to avoid clicking untrusted links while logged in.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 91% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche open-source library management system, limited industry-specific deployment
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
High

Priority Score

44
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Request Forgery exploits the automatic credential inclusion behavior of web browsers.

More in PHP

View all
CVE-2019-11043 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 28

In PHP versions 7.1.x below 7.1.33, 7.2.x below 7.2.24 and 7.3.x below 7.3.11 in certain configurations of FPM setup it

CVE-2012-1823 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 11

sapi/cgi/cgi_main.c in PHP before 5.3.12 and 5.4.x before 5.4.2, when configured as a CGI script (aka php-cgi), does not

CVE-2016-1555 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 21

(1) boardData102.php, (2) boardData103.php, (3) boardDataJP.php, (4) boardDataNA.php, and (5) boardDataWW.php in Netgear

CVE-2018-11138 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 31

The '/common/download_agent_installer.php' script in the Quest KACE System Management Appliance 8.0.318 is accessible by

CVE-2024-11680 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 26

ProjectSend versions prior to r1720 are affected by an improper authentication vulnerability. Rated critical severity (C

CVE-2025-49113 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Jun 02

Roundcube Webmail contains a critical PHP object deserialization vulnerability (CVE-2025-49113, CVSS 9.9) that allows au

CVE-2017-9841 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 27

Util/PHP/eval-stdin.php in PHPUnit before 4.8.28 and 5.x before 5.6.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP c

CVE-2025-0108 HIGH POC
8.8 Feb 12

Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS management web interface contains an authentication bypass allowing unauthenticated attackers

CVE-2021-25298 HIGH POC
8.8 Feb 15

Nagios XI version xi-5.7.5 is affected by OS command injection. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is re

CVE-2021-25296 HIGH POC
8.8 Feb 15

Nagios XI version xi-5.7.5 is affected by OS command injection. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is re

CVE-2013-4983 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Sep 10

The get_referers function in /opt/ws/bin/sblistpack in Sophos Web Appliance before 3.7.9.1 and 3.8 before 3.8.1.1 allows

CVE-2023-6553 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 15

The Backup Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 1

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy