Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessLure authenticated SLiMS admin to page
-
ExploitBrowser auto-sends forged action=run GET
-
ExecutionServer performs privileged operation under admin session
-
ImpactLoan history records deleted
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V3 - Web Frontend Security Anti-CSRF tokens, SameSite cookies
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Initial Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires a victim who is an authenticated SLiMS administrator with an active session to be tricked into loading attacker-controlled content that issues admin/modules/circulation/loan_history_maintenance.php?action=run. The specific enabling weakness is that this administrative, destructive endpoint accepts the action via a GET request with no anti-CSRF token and no POST confirmation step, so any cross-site request carrying the admin's session cookie succeeds. Limiting factors: exploitation is impossible without an authenticated admin performing the user interaction (UI:R), so it cannot be fully automated or run unattended; it also depends on the admin session being active in the same browser when the forged request fires. |
| Impact | The input CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, score 8.8) is the main severity signal, but it overstates real-world risk for a CSRF flaw. Attack vector is network and complexity low, and PR:N reflects that the attacker themselves needs no credentials, but UI:R is load-bearing here: exploitation requires an already-authenticated SLiMS administrator to be lured into triggering the malicious action=run GET request. The supplied C:H is questionable for classic CSRF because the attacker cannot read the cross-origin response - the realistic impact is destructive (deletion/loss of loan history records), i.e. integrity/availability of that data, not confidentiality disclosure; verify the confidentiality rating with the reporter. EPSS is low at 0.20% (9th percentile) and there is no CISA KEV listing, so there is no evidence of active or widespread exploitation. A public PoC reference exists (github.com/Primandito/CVE-2026-107084) but is not verified as working exploit code. No SSVC automatable/technical-impact decision values were provided; the only decision signal is the vuln.today 'this_week' priority. Net: a genuine, straightforwardly-triggered CSRF worth patching on a normal (this-week) cadence rather than an emergency - the high CVSS is tempered by the required admin interaction, the low EPSS, the absence of KEV, and the niche deployment footprint of the product. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker hosts a web page (or sends an email/link) containing an auto-loading image or redirect pointing at admin/modules/circulation/loan_history_maintenance.php?action=run on a target SLiMS install. When a logged-in SLiMS administrator visits that page, their browser silently replays the request with their session cookie, executing the privileged destructive operation and wiping loan history records. A public PoC reference exists but is not verified as working exploit code; exploitation is gated on tricking an authenticated admin into visiting the attacker's content. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 28, 2026
Cross-site request forgery in SLiMS 9 Bulian 9.8.0 allows a remote attacker to trick a logged-in administrator into issuing a GET request to admin/modules/circulation/loan_history_maintenance.php?action=run, which deletes loan history records. The endpoint lacks a CSRF token and POST confirmation, so the forged request executes with the administrator's privileges; the assessed impact is integrity-only (C:N/I:H/A:N), not confidentiality or availability. Exploitation requires an active admin session and user interaction (UI:R); a public PoC reference exists but is not verified as working exploit code, and EPSS is low at 0.20% (9th percentile).
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch is identified in the available data; track https://github.com/slims/slims9_bulian/issues/394 and https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-107084 for a fixed release. The evidence does not list a vendor workaround. Because the flaw is the absence of a CSRF token and POST confirmation on admin/modules/circulation/loan_history_maintenance.php?action=run, a complete fix requires adding an anti-CSRF token and requiring POST for that action. Until a patched release exists, exposure is reduced by keeping the SLiMS admin interface off untrusted networks and having administrators avoid browsing untrusted sites while logged in; this lowers, but does not remove, the UI:R attack path.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
SLiMS (Senayan Library Management Systems) is a PHP-based library management application, and the vulnerable module is an administrative circulation loan-history maintenance script. CWE-352 (CSRF) arises because action=run is accepted as a GET parameter without an anti-CSRF token or POST confirmation, letting a cross-site request carrying the admin's session cookie trigger a state-changing, destructive operation. The supplied CVSS vector uses AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U, meaning the attacker is unauthenticated but the victim must interact; the independent assessment revises impact to C:N/I:H/A:N, reflecting deletion of loan-history records rather than disclosure or denial of service. The supplied CPE (cpe:2.3:a:n/a:n/a:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) is n/a and does not independently confirm the product or version. EPSS 0.20% (9th percentile) indicates low predicted exploitation.
Know when PHP gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CSRF cannot read the response so C:N; forged action destructively deletes loan history records giving I:H; service stays up so A:N; UI:R because an authenticated admin must trigger the request.
Primary rating from Vendor (mitre).
CVSS VectorVendor: mitre
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
Slims (Senayan Library Management Systems) 9 Bulian 9.8.0 allows cross-site request forgery (CSRF) against admin/modules/circulation/loan_history_maintenance.php because the action=run GET parameter performs privileged, destructive operations with no CSRF token or POST confirmation, leading to data loss of loan history records.
Executive ViewAI
SLiMS 9 Bulian 9.8.0, a library management system, contains a high-severity cross-site request forgery vulnerability that could allow an attacker to trick a logged-in administrator into deleting loan history records. This integrity-only flaw affects library operations and record-keeping, but does not compromise confidentiality or system availability. Leadership should prioritize remediation given the potential for data loss and operational disruption.
No vendor patch is available. Interim mitigations include enforcing CSRF tokens and POST confirmation on the vulnerable endpoint, restricting administrative access to trusted networks, and conducting awareness training for administrators to avoid clicking untrusted links while logged in.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Request Forgery exploits the automatic credential inclusion behavior of web browsers.
In PHP versions 7.1.x below 7.1.33, 7.2.x below 7.2.24 and 7.3.x below 7.3.11 in certain configurations of FPM setup it
sapi/cgi/cgi_main.c in PHP before 5.3.12 and 5.4.x before 5.4.2, when configured as a CGI script (aka php-cgi), does not
(1) boardData102.php, (2) boardData103.php, (3) boardDataJP.php, (4) boardDataNA.php, and (5) boardDataWW.php in Netgear
The '/common/download_agent_installer.php' script in the Quest KACE System Management Appliance 8.0.318 is accessible by
ProjectSend versions prior to r1720 are affected by an improper authentication vulnerability. Rated critical severity (C
Roundcube Webmail contains a critical PHP object deserialization vulnerability (CVE-2025-49113, CVSS 9.9) that allows au
Util/PHP/eval-stdin.php in PHPUnit before 4.8.28 and 5.x before 5.6.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP c
Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS management web interface contains an authentication bypass allowing unauthenticated attackers
Nagios XI version xi-5.7.5 is affected by OS command injection. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is re
Nagios XI version xi-5.7.5 is affected by OS command injection. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is re
The get_referers function in /opt/ws/bin/sblistpack in Sophos Web Appliance before 3.7.9.1 and 3.8 before 3.8.1.1 allows
The Backup Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 1
EUVD-2026-104552
GHSA-2h92-7h5x-98h5
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Exploit-DB