Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as low-privileged user
-
ExploitSubmit attacker-controlled PingOne config to groups endpoint
-
ExecutionServer issues SSRF with stored secret
-
ImpactCapture exfiltrated PingOne application secret
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires a valid authenticated account with low privileges on the Devolutions Server instance, and the attacker must be able to reach the PingOne groups endpoint and supply an attacker-controlled PingOne configuration value in the request parameter. The target must have a stored PingOne application secret configured (i.e., PingOne integration is set up), so instances without PingOne integration are not exposed. Limiting factors: authentication is required (PR:L), attack complexity is high (AC:H) because the attacker must craft a valid malicious PingOne configuration that the server will act on, and the impact is confined to disclosure of the PingOne application secret (C:L; no integrity or availability impact). |
| Impact | This is a low-severity, low-priority issue despite being network-reachable. The vendor CVSS of 2.6 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N) reflects the real picture: exploitation requires an already-authenticated low-privileged account (PR:L), high attack complexity (AC:H) tied to manipulating the PingOne configuration, and yields only limited confidentiality impact (C:L) - disclosure of a single stored PingOne application secret - with no integrity or availability impact. All corroborating signals agree it is low urgency: CISA SSVC rates Exploitation as 'none', Automatable as 'no', and Technical Impact as only 'partial'. No EPSS score was provided in the input, and there is no KEV listing and no public exploit identified, so there is no evidence of exploitation activity. The signals are mutually consistent rather than conflicting - this is a genuine but narrow, low-impact SSRF, not a high-CVSS-but-low-real-risk mismatch nor an under-scored sleeper. Note one minor internal tension worth verifying with the vendor: the CVSS vector sets UI:R (user interaction required), yet the description portrays a self-directed attack in which the authenticated attacker supplies their own PingOne configuration parameter, which would normally imply UI:N; this does not change the overall low-priority conclusion. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An authenticated low-privileged user of a Devolutions Server instance (2026.3.8.0 or earlier) crafts a request to the PingOne groups endpoint supplying an attacker-controlled PingOne configuration in a request parameter. The server performs a server-side request using the stored PingOne application secret, allowing the attacker to redirect that request and exfiltrate the secret. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and high attack complexity plus the need for a valid account limit practical abuse. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 16, 2026
Server-side request forgery in the PingOne groups endpoint of Devolutions Server 2026.3.8.0 and earlier lets an authenticated user with low privileges supply an attacker-controlled PingOne configuration in a request parameter and cause the server to act on it, resulting in exfiltration of the stored PingOne application secret. The issue carries a CVSS base score of 2.6 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N), is limited to a confidentiality impact on the PingOne secret, and only affects instances where the PingOne integration is configured with a stored application secret. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and a vendor patch is available.
RemediationAI
Upgrade to Devolutions Server 2026.3.10 or later, which is the first release outside the affected range and the fix referenced by the vendor advisory at https://devolutions.net/security/advisories/DEVO-2026-0036/ (patch availability is confirmed as "available from vendor"). If immediate upgrade is not possible, treat the stored PingOne application secret as compromised: rotate that secret in PingOne and, where the integration is not strictly required, remove or disable the PingOne configuration so there is no secret for the endpoint to disclose, accepting the loss of PingOne group synchronization as the trade-off. Restrict network and account access to the PingOne groups endpoint to trusted administrators only, since exploitation requires an authenticated low-privileged account, and audit server-side request logs for outbound calls to unexpected PingOne hosts as a detection measure; note that these compensating controls reduce exposure but do not eliminate the SSRF path the way the 2026.3.10 upgrade does.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
This is a classic server-side request forgery (CWE-918) rooted in the PingOne integration of Devolutions Server. The PingOne groups endpoint accepts a PingOne configuration supplied by the requester and uses it when the server initiates its own outbound request to the PingOne service; because the destination and credential context are taken from that request parameter, an attacker with a valid low-privileged account can point the configuration at infrastructure they control. When the server performs the lookup, it includes the previously stored PingOne application secret, which is then captured by the attacker. The assessed vector (AC:H, PR:L, UI:N) reflects that the attacker must be authenticated, must be able to reach the PingOne groups endpoint, and must craft a syntactically valid malicious PingOne configuration that the server will accept and act on, while impact is confined to disclosure of the secret (C:L) with no integrity or availability effect. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:devolutions:server:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* identifies Devolutions Server as the affected product family, and the ENISA EUVD entry (EUVD-2026-102877) lists affected builds as Server versions from 0 up to but excluding 2026.3.10.
Know when Server gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Network-reachable endpoint (AV:N) abused by an authenticated low-privileged user (PR:L); AC:H for the required PingOne config manipulation; UI:N as the attacker drives it; only the PingOne secret leaks (C:L, I:N, A:N).
Primary rating from Vendor (DEVOLUTIONS).
CVSS VectorVendor: DEVOLUTIONS
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
Server-side request forgery in PingOne groups endpoint in Devolutions Server 2026.3.8.0 and earlier allows an authenticated low-privileged user to exfiltrate the stored PingOne application secret via an attacker-controlled PingOne configuration in the request parameter.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.
Traccar Traccar Server version 4.0 and earlier contains a CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injectio
Account takeover in self-hosted Bitwarden Server before 2026.6.0 lets a low-privileged organization member steal any oth
Full user impersonation in the Laci Synchroni sync server (backend prior to 1.2.3) lets an attacker take over any accoun
Provider service users in Bitwarden Server Cloud can hijack arbitrary organizations via unauthorized API endpoint access
NoMachine Server is affected by Integer Overflow. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is low attack compl
NoMachine Server is affected by Buffer Overflow. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is low attack comple
Authentication bypass in Bitwarden Server versions prior to 2026.4.1 allows authenticated users with SCIM management pri
JetAudio jetCast Server 2.0 contains a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the Log Directory configuration fiel
Credential-holding attackers can completely bypass TOTP two-factor authentication on Sync-in Server versions prior to 2.
A broken authentication vulnerability in 4D SAS 4D Server software v17, v18, v19 R7, and earlier allows attackers to sen
An information disclosure vulnerability in 4D SAS 4D Server Application v17, v18, v19 R7 and earlier allows attackers to
Privilege escalation in self-hosted Bitwarden Server before 2026.5.0 lets an authenticated organization member holding a
EUVD-2026-102877
GHSA-qh8g-mmrv-wjr8
NVD
CVE.org
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB