Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privileged local session
  2. Delivery
    Invoke vulnerable WebDAV code path
  3. Exploit
    Trigger heap buffer overflow
  4. Execution
    Execute code as SYSTEM
  5. Impact
    Full host compromise

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already have a low-privileged authenticated local session on the Windows host (CVSS PR:L, AV:L) and the ability to reach the vulnerable WebDAV handling code - practically meaning the WebDAV/WebClient functionality must be present and reachable on the target. There is no network vector and no user interaction is needed (UI:N). Limiting factors that reduce real-world risk: the attacker needs a pre-existing foothold with code execution as a normal user, so this cannot be used as an initial remote entry point; SSVC marks it non-automatable, indicating it is not suited to mass/wormable exploitation. Risk is highest on multi-user systems (terminal/RDS servers, shared workstations) where untrusted users can execute code.

Impact

This is a genuinely actionable local privilege-escalation flaw but not a drop-everything emergency. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U) describes a low-complexity local attack requiring an attacker to already hold low-privilege authenticated access on the Windows host; it is not remotely exploitable despite the 7.8 'High' base score, and the score is driven entirely by the total impact (C:H/I:H/A:H) typical of SYSTEM-level escalation. The signals are internally consistent and point to LOWER real-world urgency than the raw score suggests: SSVC reports Exploitation=none (no observed exploitation), Automatable=no (it is not mass-scannable/wormable because it needs a local foothold), and the CVE is NOT in CISA KEV. No POC is referenced and no EPSS score is provided in the input, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified here - this is a data gap, not evidence of safety. The realistic role of this bug is as a second-stage local escalation primitive chained after an initial foothold (phishing, another RCE, or an insider), rather than an internet-facing entry point. Prioritize it in normal Patch Tuesday cadence, weighted up for multi-user, terminal-server, and shared workstation environments where untrusted low-privilege users run code.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has already gained a low-privileged authenticated session on a Windows machine (e.g. via phishing, stolen credentials, or a prior exploit) runs a crafted program that drives the vulnerable WebDAV code path to overflow a heap buffer. Successful exploitation corrupts heap memory to achieve code execution as SYSTEM, completing a local privilege escalation. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, and the attack requires local access rather than a network connection.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026

Heap-based buffer overflow in the Windows WebDAV implementation lets a locally authenticated attacker with only low privileges corrupt heap memory and elevate privileges on the same host, yielding high confidentiality, integrity and availability impact (CVSS 7.8, AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U). Exploitation requires a pre-existing foothold - code execution as a normal user on the target and reachable WebDAV/WebClient functionality - so this is a post-compromise privilege-escalation primitive rather than a remote entry point, and CISA's SSVC assessment marks it non-automatable, i.e. not suited to wormable mass exploitation. No public exploit code and no active exploitation have been identified at time of analysis, but Microsoft has shipped patches and real-world risk is concentrated on multi-user hosts such as RDS/terminal servers and shared workstations where several low-privileged users can run code.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patches are available from Microsoft per the advisory https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-96843; install the update that matches each affected build (for example Windows 11 24H2/25H2 to 10.0.26100.9711 / 10.0.26200.9711, Windows Server 2025 to 10.0.26100.33650, Windows Server 2022 to 10.0.20348.5761, Windows Server 2019 and Windows 10 1809 to 10.0.17763.9376, Windows Server 2016 and Windows 10 1607 to 10.0.14393.9612, Windows 10 21H2/22H2 to 10.0.19044.7807, Windows Server 2012 R2 to 6.3.9600.23470 and Windows Server 2012 to 6.2.9200.26434) and prioritise multi-user hosts first. If immediate patching is impossible, reduce attack surface by disabling the WebClient (WebDAV mini-redirector) service on systems that do not need WebDAV mounts - this removes the client-side parsing path but breaks WebDAV/\host@SSL UNC access and some SharePoint/OneDrive WebDAV workflows; on servers, disable the IIS WebDAV Publishing role if unused, which eliminates the server-side handler at the cost of any WebDAV publishing functionality. Additionally restrict interactive logon and RDP access on shared/RDS hosts to trusted users (limiting who can supply the local input the exploit needs), and monitor for unexpected process creation at higher integrity levels from WebDAV-related services as a detection backstop; note that none of these compensating controls address the underlying memory-safety defect, so patching remains the only complete fix.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

WebDAV (Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning) is the HTTP extension Windows uses to mount and manipulate remote file collections, implemented client-side primarily through the WebClient service (the WebDAV mini-redirector) and server-side through WebDAV publishing, with requests ultimately handled by the Windows HTTP stack. The root cause is CWE-122, a heap-based buffer overflow: the component parses WebDAV protocol data and performs a memory copy whose size is derived from attacker-influenced input without adequate bounds validation, overwriting adjacent heap metadata and structures. Because the corrupted allocation lives in the heap of the process handling the request, the overflow can be shaped into controlled memory corruption and ultimately code execution at the privilege of that handling component - which is what makes the privilege boundary (S:U, but C:H/I:H/A:H) crossable from a low-privileged local session. The CPE/EUVD data ties the flaw to the Windows kernel-user HTTP/WebDAV stack across Windows 10, Windows 11 and Windows Server 2012 through 2025, and the CVSS vector (AV:L, PR:L, UI:N) confirms a local, authenticated, no-user-interaction attack, with the reported tags 'Buffer Overflow' and 'Heap Overflow' and CWE-122 consistent with the heap-corruption class. ENISA tracks this as EUVD-2026-100233 and Microsoft is credited as the reporting/coordinating party.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.8 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Local privilege escalation needing a low-privileged foothold (AV:L, PR:L) with no user interaction and straightforward triggering (AC:L); heap overflow yielding SYSTEM gives total C/I/A impact.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:21 cve.org
HIGH 7.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Heap-based buffer overflow in WebDAV allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft's Windows WebDAV implementation (CVE-2026-96843, CVSS 7.8) lets an attacker who already holds a low-privileged foothold on a machine escalate to higher privileges on that same host, with high confidentiality, integrity and availability impact. Because exploitation requires existing code execution by a normal user, the practical exposure is concentrated on multi-user systems such as RDS/terminal servers and shared workstations, where many low-privileged users share one kernel and one patch state. Leadership should care because a vendor patch is available and this is a low-cost, high-leverage fix for environments where one compromised account could otherwise become control of the host; no public exploit identified at time of analysis and CISA's SSVC rating marks it non-automatable, so urgency is driven by internal multi-user concentration rather than a mass-exploitation threat.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 77% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Core Microsoft Windows component across all supported client and server editions
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +39
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy