Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessReach domain controller over network
-
DeliverySatisfy required timing/state condition
-
ExploitAbuse incorrect authorization check
-
ExecutionExecute code on DC
-
ImpactCompromise Active Directory domain
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization logic validation
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires network reachability to a domain controller running Active Directory Domain Services; no authentication is needed (PR:N) and no user interaction is required (UI:N). The key limiting factor is CVSS AC:H - the attacker must satisfy a specific condition outside their control (such as a timing window or race, or particular directory state) for the incorrect authorization check to be bypassed, so exploitation is not a single deterministic request against a default configuration. This affects the AD DS role specifically; member servers and clients not acting as domain controllers are not the exploitation target, which bounds real-world exposure to DC-hosting systems. |
| Impact | This is a genuinely high-priority flaw with important caveats. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N) describes a network-reachable, unauthenticated vulnerability in Active Directory Domain Services yielding high confidentiality, integrity and availability impact - code execution against the directory service that underpins enterprise identity, which is why the base score is 8.1. The single most mitigating signal is AC:H (high attack complexity): successful exploitation depends on conditions outside the attacker's direct control (e.g. timing, specific state, or a race), which meaningfully lowers the ease of reliable, scaled exploitation. No EPSS probability was supplied, so automated exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified. KEV status is not present in the input, so there is no evidence of active exploitation; likewise no POC is indicated. SSVC-style framing: exploitation = none observed, technical impact = total (full compromise of a domain controller), automatable = likely NO given AC:H. The one data tension worth flagging: the input Tag says 'Authentication Bypass' while the description and CWE-863 both describe incorrect authorization - these are related but distinct, and the vulnerability is more precisely an authorization flaw than an authentication bypass. Net: treat as a priority patch for any domain controller because of impact and unauthenticated network reach, but the AC:H and absence of exploitation/POC signals argue against treating it as an imminent mass-exploitation event. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A remote, unauthenticated attacker with network access to a domain controller sends crafted requests that abuse an incorrect authorization check in Active Directory Domain Services to gain code execution on the DC. Because AC:H, the attacker must win a race or satisfy specific environmental conditions, so exploitation is not trivially repeatable. No public exploit identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026
Remote code execution against domain controllers running Active Directory Domain Services is achievable by an unauthenticated network attacker (CVSS 3.1: AV:N/PR:N/UI:N) who successfully bypasses an incorrect authorization check, yielding full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact for a base score of 8.1. The practical constraint is the High attack-complexity rating: exploiting the flawed authorization decision requires an attacker-influenced condition such as a timing window, race, or particular directory state rather than a single deterministic request against a default configuration, and only hosts serving the AD DS role - not member servers or ordinary clients - are the realistic target. At time of analysis no public exploit identified and no confirmed active exploitation (no CISA KEV listing); vendor patch available, with EUVD-listed fixed build levels published.
RemediationAI
Apply the vendor-released updates; Microsoft's advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-70229 provides the covered builds, and per the EUVD-2026-100132 ranges the fixed levels include 6.2.9200.26434 (Server 2012), 6.3.9600.23470 (Server 2012 R2), 10.0.14393.9612 (Server 2016/Windows 10 1607), 10.0.17763.9376 (Server 2019/Windows 10 1809), 10.0.20348.5761 (Server 2022), 10.0.26100.33650 (Server 2025), 10.0.19044.7807 (Windows 10 21H2/22H2), 10.0.22631.7652 (Windows 11 23H2), 10.0.26100.9711 (Windows 11 24H2), 10.0.26200.9711 (Windows 11 25H2), 10.0.26300.9711 (Windows 11 26H2) and 10.0.28000.3231 (Windows 11 26H1). Patch domain controllers first, since they are the exploitation target and the High attack-complexity condition does not remove the unauthenticated network exposure. Where immediate patching of every DC is not possible, the most effective compensating control is to constrain network reachability to DC services - restrict LDAP/LDAPS (389/636), Kerberos (88), SMB (445), RPC endpoint mapper and dynamic RPC ports, and DRS replication traffic to trusted management and domain-member segments via host firewall rules or network segmentation; the trade-off is that overly tight filtering breaks domain joins, replication between DCs, and client authentication. Tier-0 isolation of DCs, removal of unnecessary inbound access from user VLANs, and monitoring of DC-side authorization failures, unexpected service creation, and anomalous code execution (e.g. via Sysmon or Windows event forwarding) can detect attempts, though they do not remediate the underlying authorization defect. Disabling AD DS entirely is not a viable mitigation on a functioning domain controller, so patch deployment remains the primary action, and no public exploit code identified at time of analysis means the near-term risk is shaped mainly by unpatched, internet- or broadly reachable domain controllers.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 20 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS) is the directory and authentication backbone of Windows domains, hosted on domain controllers that expose LDAP/LDAPS, Kerberos, SMB, RPC/DRS replication and related network services to domain members. CWE-863 (Incorrect Authorization) indicates that an authorization decision in the AD DS network-facing code path is missing, misapplied, or evaluated against the wrong principal/context, so a caller who should be rejected is instead permitted to reach functionality that allows code execution over the network. The CVSS vector AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U, with the High complexity metric, matches the independent assessment that the bypass is conditional - an attacker must satisfy a prerequisite outside their control (a timing/race window or a specific directory state) rather than simply sending a crafted request. The 'Authentication Bypass' intelligence tag aligns with CWE-863, and the EUVD-2026-100132 version ranges confirm broad coverage across the Windows servicing branches: Windows Server 2012/2012 R2 (6.2.9200, 6.3.9600), Server 2016 and Windows 10 1607 (10.0.14393), Server 2019 and Windows 10 1809 (10.0.17763), Server 2022 (10.0.20348), Server 2025 and Windows 11 24H2 (10.0.26100), and Windows 10 21H2/22H2 (10.0.1904x) among others, including the Server Core installation variants. Because the vulnerable logic sits in the domain controller role, real-world exposure is bounded by how many systems in an environment actually hold that role.
Know when Windows 10 1607 gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Network-reachable AD DS flaw exploitable without auth or interaction (AV:N/PR:N/UI:N) but gated by a condition outside attacker control (AC:H), yielding full C/I/A impact via code execution.
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Incorrect authorization in Active Directory Domain Services allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Executive ViewAI
A high-severity vulnerability in Active Directory Domain Services on domain controllers could allow an unauthenticated network attacker to achieve remote code execution, potentially giving full control over the affected domain controller. Because domain controllers underpin authentication and authorization across the enterprise, a successful compromise could disrupt or compromise broad business operations and identity trust. A vendor patch is available and no public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the high attack complexity and domain-controller-specific targeting mean the issue should still be treated as a priority for remediation.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
More in Windows 10 1607
View allWindows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX
<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi
Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f
The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows
The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co
Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth
The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited
Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo
Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour
Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in
EUVD-2026-100132
GHSA-4vf9-9x53-84m6
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB