Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach domain controller over network
  2. Delivery
    Satisfy required timing/state condition
  3. Exploit
    Abuse incorrect authorization check
  4. Execution
    Execute code on DC
  5. Impact
    Compromise Active Directory domain

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization logic validation
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires network reachability to a domain controller running Active Directory Domain Services; no authentication is needed (PR:N) and no user interaction is required (UI:N). The key limiting factor is CVSS AC:H - the attacker must satisfy a specific condition outside their control (such as a timing window or race, or particular directory state) for the incorrect authorization check to be bypassed, so exploitation is not a single deterministic request against a default configuration. This affects the AD DS role specifically; member servers and clients not acting as domain controllers are not the exploitation target, which bounds real-world exposure to DC-hosting systems.

Impact

This is a genuinely high-priority flaw with important caveats. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N) describes a network-reachable, unauthenticated vulnerability in Active Directory Domain Services yielding high confidentiality, integrity and availability impact - code execution against the directory service that underpins enterprise identity, which is why the base score is 8.1. The single most mitigating signal is AC:H (high attack complexity): successful exploitation depends on conditions outside the attacker's direct control (e.g. timing, specific state, or a race), which meaningfully lowers the ease of reliable, scaled exploitation. No EPSS probability was supplied, so automated exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified. KEV status is not present in the input, so there is no evidence of active exploitation; likewise no POC is indicated. SSVC-style framing: exploitation = none observed, technical impact = total (full compromise of a domain controller), automatable = likely NO given AC:H. The one data tension worth flagging: the input Tag says 'Authentication Bypass' while the description and CWE-863 both describe incorrect authorization - these are related but distinct, and the vulnerability is more precisely an authorization flaw than an authentication bypass. Net: treat as a priority patch for any domain controller because of impact and unauthenticated network reach, but the AC:H and absence of exploitation/POC signals argue against treating it as an imminent mass-exploitation event.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A remote, unauthenticated attacker with network access to a domain controller sends crafted requests that abuse an incorrect authorization check in Active Directory Domain Services to gain code execution on the DC. Because AC:H, the attacker must win a race or satisfy specific environmental conditions, so exploitation is not trivially repeatable. No public exploit identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.7% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026

Remote code execution against domain controllers running Active Directory Domain Services is achievable by an unauthenticated network attacker (CVSS 3.1: AV:N/PR:N/UI:N) who successfully bypasses an incorrect authorization check, yielding full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact for a base score of 8.1. The practical constraint is the High attack-complexity rating: exploiting the flawed authorization decision requires an attacker-influenced condition such as a timing window, race, or particular directory state rather than a single deterministic request against a default configuration, and only hosts serving the AD DS role - not member servers or ordinary clients - are the realistic target. At time of analysis no public exploit identified and no confirmed active exploitation (no CISA KEV listing); vendor patch available, with EUVD-listed fixed build levels published.

RemediationAI

Apply the vendor-released updates; Microsoft's advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-70229 provides the covered builds, and per the EUVD-2026-100132 ranges the fixed levels include 6.2.9200.26434 (Server 2012), 6.3.9600.23470 (Server 2012 R2), 10.0.14393.9612 (Server 2016/Windows 10 1607), 10.0.17763.9376 (Server 2019/Windows 10 1809), 10.0.20348.5761 (Server 2022), 10.0.26100.33650 (Server 2025), 10.0.19044.7807 (Windows 10 21H2/22H2), 10.0.22631.7652 (Windows 11 23H2), 10.0.26100.9711 (Windows 11 24H2), 10.0.26200.9711 (Windows 11 25H2), 10.0.26300.9711 (Windows 11 26H2) and 10.0.28000.3231 (Windows 11 26H1). Patch domain controllers first, since they are the exploitation target and the High attack-complexity condition does not remove the unauthenticated network exposure. Where immediate patching of every DC is not possible, the most effective compensating control is to constrain network reachability to DC services - restrict LDAP/LDAPS (389/636), Kerberos (88), SMB (445), RPC endpoint mapper and dynamic RPC ports, and DRS replication traffic to trusted management and domain-member segments via host firewall rules or network segmentation; the trade-off is that overly tight filtering breaks domain joins, replication between DCs, and client authentication. Tier-0 isolation of DCs, removal of unnecessary inbound access from user VLANs, and monitoring of DC-side authorization failures, unexpected service creation, and anomalous code execution (e.g. via Sysmon or Windows event forwarding) can detect attempts, though they do not remediate the underlying authorization defect. Disabling AD DS entirely is not a viable mitigation on a functioning domain controller, so patch deployment remains the primary action, and no public exploit code identified at time of analysis means the near-term risk is shaped mainly by unpatched, internet- or broadly reachable domain controllers.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS) is the directory and authentication backbone of Windows domains, hosted on domain controllers that expose LDAP/LDAPS, Kerberos, SMB, RPC/DRS replication and related network services to domain members. CWE-863 (Incorrect Authorization) indicates that an authorization decision in the AD DS network-facing code path is missing, misapplied, or evaluated against the wrong principal/context, so a caller who should be rejected is instead permitted to reach functionality that allows code execution over the network. The CVSS vector AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U, with the High complexity metric, matches the independent assessment that the bypass is conditional - an attacker must satisfy a prerequisite outside their control (a timing/race window or a specific directory state) rather than simply sending a crafted request. The 'Authentication Bypass' intelligence tag aligns with CWE-863, and the EUVD-2026-100132 version ranges confirm broad coverage across the Windows servicing branches: Windows Server 2012/2012 R2 (6.2.9200, 6.3.9600), Server 2016 and Windows 10 1607 (10.0.14393), Server 2019 and Windows 10 1809 (10.0.17763), Server 2022 (10.0.20348), Server 2025 and Windows 11 24H2 (10.0.26100), and Windows 10 21H2/22H2 (10.0.1904x) among others, including the Server Core installation variants. Because the vulnerable logic sits in the domain controller role, real-world exposure is bounded by how many systems in an environment actually hold that role.

Know when Windows 10 1607 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 8.1 HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.1 HIGH

Network-reachable AD DS flaw exploitable without auth or interaction (AV:N/PR:N/UI:N) but gated by a condition outside attacker control (AC:H), yielding full C/I/A impact via code execution.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:19 nvd
HIGH 8.1

DescriptionCVE.org

Incorrect authorization in Active Directory Domain Services allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A high-severity vulnerability in Active Directory Domain Services on domain controllers could allow an unauthenticated network attacker to achieve remote code execution, potentially giving full control over the affected domain controller. Because domain controllers underpin authentication and authorization across the enterprise, a successful compromise could disrupt or compromise broad business operations and identity trust. A vendor patch is available and no public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the high attack complexity and domain-controller-specific targeting mean the issue should still be treated as a priority for remediation.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.7%
Top 48% exploitable
Prevalence
High
Active Directory Domain Services runs on domain controllers across most Windows enterprises
Threat Intel
1
1 sources
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation More Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.7%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

41
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +40
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 17

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows

CVE-2018-8174 HIGH POC
7.5 May 09

The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2016-7255 HIGH POC
7.8 Nov 10

The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2023-44487 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 10

Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour

CVE-2024-30088 HIGH POC
7.0 Jun 11

Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR

CVE-2019-1458 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy