Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
ReconGain local user access
-
DeliveryIdentify PMF driver interface
-
ExploitSend malformed input to PMF
-
InstallTrigger arbitrary memory unmap
-
C2Corrupt kernel structures
-
ExecuteEscalate to SYSTEM privileges
-
ImpactExfiltrate data or deploy payloads
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Input validation, allowlisting
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires authenticated local access with low-level user privileges (CVSS PR:L) to a system running AMD Platform Management Framework on affected Ryzen processor models. The attacker must be able to interact with the PMF driver interface-typically accessible to any local user process on Windows or Linux systems with AMD drivers installed. No special configuration, disabled security features, or non-default settings required (AC:L indicates low attack complexity). No user interaction needed beyond the attacker's initial system access (UI:N). The Changed scope (S:C in legacy terms) indicates the vulnerability crosses trust boundaries from unprivileged PMF client context to privileged kernel/firmware context. Limiting factors: requires initial local code execution capability, cannot be exploited remotely without chaining with another vulnerability to gain local access first. Physical access alone insufficient if system uses full disk encryption and secure boot, but any malware, trojanized application, or malicious script with standard user rights can attempt exploitation. |
| Impact | CVSS 4.0 score of 8.4 reflects high real-world risk driven by the Changed scope (SC:H/SI:H/SA:H) indicating privilege boundary crossing. The AV:L/AC:L combination means exploitation requires local access but no special conditions once obtained-straightforward for malware, ransomware droppers, or supply chain attacks targeting corporate laptops. PR:L indicates low-privileged authenticated access suffices, not requiring admin rights initially. The Changed scope metrics signal that a compromised low-privilege PMF client can impact system-wide confidentiality (SC:H), integrity (SI:H), and availability (SA:H) beyond its own context-textbook privilege escalation. However, lack of EPSS data and absence from CISA KEV suggests no widespread exploitation detected yet. The extensive affected product range (all modern AMD mobile Ryzen since 2022) creates large attack surface across enterprise laptop fleets. Missing data: EPSS probability, POC availability, SSVC exploitation status. Without these, we rely on CVSS alone, which may overstate urgency if attack requires complex chaining or understate if POCs emerge. Priority depends on organizational AMD Ryzen deployment density and existence of compensating endpoint controls. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker deploys malware to a corporate laptop running affected AMD Ryzen processor (e.g., Ryzen 7040 series). The malware initially runs as a standard user process with low privileges (PR:L). It exploits the PMF input validation flaw by sending crafted commands to the Platform Management Framework driver, specifying arbitrary kernel memory page addresses to unmap. This corrupts critical kernel data structures or unmaps security enforcement code, allowing the malware to escalate to SYSTEM/root privileges (Changed scope impact). With elevated access, the attacker exfiltrates credentials, installs persistent backdoor, or deploys ransomware across the network. Local attack vector (AV:L) and low complexity (AC:L) make this realistic once initial access is achieved via phishing, software vulnerability, or insider threat. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – May 15, 2026
Local privilege escalation in AMD Platform Management Framework (PMF) allows authenticated attackers with low privileges to unmap arbitrary memory pages, potentially executing code with elevated privileges or triggering system crashes. Affects modern AMD Ryzen mobile processors across multiple generations (6000/7000/8000/AI 300 series, embedded variants). The vulnerability enables both horizontal escalation (confidentiality compromise via changed scope in CVSS 4.0) and vertical impact (integrity/availability degradation). No evidence of active exploitation (not in CISA KEV), but the local attack vector with low complexity makes this exploitable by malware or malicious insiders once system access is obtained. EPSS data not available for risk calibration.
RemediationAI
Apply AMD-provided firmware and driver updates per Security Bulletin AMD-SB-4015 available at https://www.amd.com/en/resources/product-security/bulletin/AMD-SB-4015.html. The bulletin should contain PMF software updates for each affected processor family-check for BIOS/UEFI firmware updates from OEM system vendors (Dell, HP, Lenovo, etc.) as PMF components are often integrated into platform firmware. Update priority: systems with untrusted local users, shared workstations, or running unvetted software. For systems awaiting patches: enforce principle of least privilege rigorously-restrict local user accounts to standard permissions, disable unnecessary local admin rights, deploy application whitelisting to prevent unauthorized code execution that could leverage this vulnerability. Monitor for abnormal memory access patterns or unexpected privilege escalation via EDR telemetry. Note that restricting physical access alone is insufficient since malware with initial foothold can exploit this. Compensating controls reduce but do not eliminate risk-patching remains the only complete mitigation. Verify patch deployment via AMD driver version checks or OEM-specific firmware validation tools.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
AMD Platform Management Framework (PMF) is a system-level software component managing power, thermal, and performance optimization on AMD Ryzen mobile processors. The vulnerability stems from CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation) where PMF fails to adequately validate input parameters before performing memory management operations. This allows manipulation of memory unmapping operations to target arbitrary physical or virtual memory pages. Affected products span seven processor families identified by CPE strings: Rembrandt (Ryzen 6000/7035), Phoenix (Ryzen 7040), Hawk Point (Ryzen 8040), Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300), Ryzen AI Max+, and Embedded 8000 series. All are mobile or embedded x86-64 platforms with integrated Radeon graphics. The framework operates with elevated privileges to manage hardware resources, making input validation failures particularly critical as they bridge userspace to kernel/firmware boundary.
Know when Amd gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H
Primary rating from NVD · only source for this CVE.
CVSS VectorNVD
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Improper input validation within the AMD Platform Management Framework (PMF) could allow an attacker to unmap arbitrary memory pages potentially impacting integrity and availability, or allowing privilege escalation resulting in loss of confidentiality.
Executive ViewAI
CVE-2025-29936 is a high-severity local privilege escalation in AMD Platform Management Framework affecting Ryzen mobile processors (6000/7000/8000/AI 300 series) that allows low-privileged authenticated users to escalate privileges, potentially enabling code execution with system-level access or forcing system failures. Organizations with AMD-based mobile endpoints or embedded systems face elevated risk of lateral movement by insider threats or malware already present on compromised devices, with particular concern for systems handling sensitive workloads or operating in zero-trust environments where privilege escalation represents a critical control bypass.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) Restrict creation of low-privileged local user accounts and enforce single-user or administrative-only access policies where operationally feasible; (2) Disable or restrict access to Platform Management Framework services if business operations permit; (3) Enable Hardware-backed Code Integrity (HVCI) and virtualization-based security (VBS) on Windows systems to limit privilege escalation impact; (4) Implement endpoint detection and response (EDR) monitoring for PMF driver abuse, unexpected kernel-mode activity, and privilege escalation events; (5) Apply full-disk encryption and enable secure boot to limit post-exploitation persistence; (6) Restrict physical access to affected devices and limit use by untrusted or high-risk users pending patch availability.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
Related Vulnerabilities in AMD Platform Management Framework (PMF) Input Validation Flaws
View all 8On BIG-IP versions 16.0.x before 16.0.1.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.2.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.4, 13.1.x before 13.1.3.6, and 12.
Local privilege escalation and information disclosure in the Linux kernel on AMD Zen2 CPUs allows low-privileged users t
An exploitable code execution vulnerability exists in the Shader functionality of AMD Radeon DirectX 11 Driver atidxx64.
An exploitable code execution vulnerability exists in the Shader functionality of AMD Radeon DirectX 11 Driver atidxx64.
An exploitable code execution vulnerability exists in the Shader functionality of AMD Radeon DirectX 11 Driver atidxx64.
An exploitable memory corruption vulnerability exists in AMD atidxx64.dll 26.20.15019.19000 graphics driver. Rated criti
plays_service.exe in the plays.tv service before 1.27.7.0, as distributed in AMD driver-installation packages and Gaming
A flaw was found in the KVM's AMD code for supporting SVM nested virtualization. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vu
AMD ATI atillk64.sys 5.11.9.0 allows low-privileged users to interact directly with physical memory by calling one of se
An exploitable out-of-bounds read vulnerability exists in AMD ATIDXX64.DLL driver, version 26.20.13001.29010. Rated high
AMD fglrx-driver before 15.9 allows local users to gain privileges via a symlink attack. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8),
AMD fglrx-driver before 15.7 allows local users to gain privileges via a symlink attack. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8),
EUVD-2025-209869
GHSA-7vj2-xcgm-4r5f
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB