Skip to main content

Fortinet FortiAP EUVDEUVD-2025-209803

| CVE-2025-53870 MEDIUM
OS Command Injection (CWE-78)
2026-05-12 fortinet GHSA-rq62-f8qm-52r7
6.7
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: fortinet
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain FortiAP admin credentials
  2. Delivery
    Authenticate via management interface
  3. Exploit
    Craft CLI command with shell metacharacters
  4. Execution
    Submit injected command
  5. Persist
    OS parser executes payload
  6. Impact
    Attacker gains unauthorized code execution

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires authentication as a high-privilege (administrative) user on the Fortinet FortiAP or FortiAP-W2 device. The attacker must have direct access to the device's CLI interface via SSH, HTTPS web console, or local serial connection (local attack vector). No special FortiAP configuration or feature enablement is documented as a prerequisite; the vulnerability exists in the default CLI command processing. Exploitation is limited to authenticated users with high administrative privileges (PR:H) and does not affect unauthenticated users or users with lower privilege levels. Non-default configurations such as role-based access control (RBAC) that restrict CLI access could limit the pool of users who can exploit this, but do not eliminate the vulnerability itself.

Impact

This vulnerability presents moderate real-world risk constrained by strict exploitation conditions. The CVSS 6.7 score reflects the severity: local attack vector (AV:L), low complexity (AC:L), and high-impact outcomes (C:H/I:H/A:H). However, the PR:H (high privilege required) requirement significantly limits the attack surface - exploitation requires an authenticated administrator account or lateral movement to such an account. The absence of network accessibility (AV:L) further restricts remote exploitation paths; an attacker cannot directly trigger this from the network and instead must either compromise an admin account or conduct insider abuse. The scope is unchanged (S:U), indicating impact is limited to the affected system. No KEV listing, no public POC, and no EPSS score data are available, suggesting this is not currently being actively exploited at scale. Organizations with strong administrative access controls and credential hygiene face lower risk; those with weak admin account practices or shared credentials face higher risk. The real-world priority depends on deployment context: FortiAP access points in enterprise environments typically have restricted admin access, but in smaller deployments or managed service environments where credentials are shared, risk increases.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A malicious insider or attacker who has compromised administrative credentials logs into the FortiAP device via SSH or HTTPS management interface. The attacker crafts a CLI command that includes shell metacharacters (such as semicolons, pipes, or backticks) to inject additional OS commands, such as executing a reverse shell, modifying system files, or disabling security features. The FortiAP parser fails to sanitize the input, passes the crafted command directly to the OS shell, and the injected commands execute with the privileges of the FortiAP daemon, allowing the attacker to gain unauthorized control of the access point.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – May 12, 2026

OS command injection in Fortinet FortiAP and FortiAP-W2 access points allows authenticated administrators to execute arbitrary code or commands via specially crafted CLI commands. Affected versions span FortiAP 6.4 through 7.6.2 and FortiAP-W2 7.0 through 7.4.4. The vulnerability requires high-privilege administrative access and does not require user interaction, making it exploitable by rogue administrators or accounts with compromised credentials. No public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Fortinet has released patched versions for FortiAP and FortiAP-W2; administrators must upgrade to FortiAP 7.6.3 or later for the 7.6 branch, 7.4.6 or later for the 7.4 branch, or verify latest patched versions in the 7.2 and 7.0 branches via the Fortinet advisory. Until patches can be deployed, implement the following compensating controls: restrict CLI access to FortiAP devices only to trusted network segments and disable remote CLI access if not required for operations. Enforce strong, unique administrative credentials and implement multi-factor authentication for administrative accounts if the FortiAP platform supports it. Monitor CLI command logs for unusual or suspicious commands, particularly those containing shell metacharacters or escape sequences. Limit the number of administrator accounts with full CLI privileges using the principle of least privilege - create role-based access controls that grant only necessary permissions. These controls introduce operational friction (monitoring overhead, potential latency from MFA) but substantially reduce the likelihood of unauthorized command injection exploitation. Consult the Fortinet PSIRT advisory at https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-133 for the most current patch versions and detailed upgrade procedures.

Affected VersionsENISA

FortiAP-W2 7.2.0 ≤7.2.5
FortiAP 6.4.3 ≤6.4.9
FortiAP 7.6.0 ≤7.6.2
FortiAP-W2 7.0.0 ≤7.0.8
FortiAP 7.2.0 ≤7.2.6
FortiAP-W2 7.4.0 ≤7.4.4
FortiAP 7.4.0 ≤7.4.5
FortiAP 7.0.0 ≤7.0.7

Affected Packages

euvd fortiap no fix
euvd fortiap_w2 no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 2 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability stems from improper neutralization of special elements in OS command construction (CWE-78), a classic command injection flaw where user-supplied input from CLI commands is not properly sanitized before being passed to system shell execution. The affected products are Fortinet's FortiAP series (wireless access points) and FortiAP-W2 variant, which process administrative CLI input. The flaw exists in the command parser that accepts CLI operations from authenticated users with high privilege levels (PR:H in CVSS), allowing injection of shell metacharacters or command separators to break out of intended command context and execute arbitrary OS-level operations with the privileges of the FortiAP process.

Know when Fortiap gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (fortinet) PRIMARY 6.7 MEDIUM
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Primary rating from Vendor (fortinet) · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorVendor: fortinet

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
CVSS changed
May 12, 2026 - 18:22 NVD
6.5 (MEDIUM) 6.7 (MEDIUM)
CVE Published
May 12, 2026 - 16:54 nvd
MEDIUM 6.7

DescriptionCVE.org

An improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAP 7.6.0 through 7.6.2, FortiAP 7.4.0 through 7.4.5, FortiAP 7.2 all versions, FortiAP 7.0 all versions, FortiAP 6.4 all versions, FortiAP-W2 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, FortiAP-W2 7.2 all versions, FortiAP-W2 7.0 all versions may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via a specifically crafted cli command.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 84% exploitable
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

34
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +34
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy