Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain access to cluster network segment
-
DeliverySend crafted packets to Failover Cluster Virtual Driver
-
ExploitTrigger double free (CWE-415) in kernel driver
-
ExecutionCorrupt kernel memory for control flow
-
ImpactExecute arbitrary code as SYSTEM
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Double free prevention
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the target Windows/Windows Server host to have the Failover Clustering role enabled so that the vulnerable Failover Cluster Virtual Driver is loaded and processing network traffic; standalone servers without clustering are not exposed. The attacker must have network reachability to the cluster communication path - in well-architected deployments this is a dedicated/isolated cluster interconnect, which materially limits remote reach despite the AV:N rating. Per the CVSS vector (PR:N/UI:N) no authentication or user interaction is required once the driver is reachable. Affected builds include Windows Server 2012 through 2025 and Windows 10 (1607/1809), fixed in the patched builds listed in EUVD (e.g., Server 2022 <10.0.20348.5761, Server 2025 <10.0.26100.33650); unpatched clustered nodes are the realistic targets. |
| Impact | Signals are largely aligned toward high priority but with one important nuance. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 9.8) describes a remote, unauthenticated, low-complexity code-execution flaw with total impact to confidentiality, integrity and availability - the classic 'critical, potentially wormable' profile, reinforced by CISA's SSVC assessment of Automatable=yes and Technical Impact=total. However, SSVC Exploitation is explicitly 'none' (no observed exploitation), the CVE is NOT in CISA KEV, and no POC is referenced, so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' EPSS is NOT provided in the input, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be factored in - this is a missing signal that should be checked before final prioritization. The practical risk is also tempered by deployment reality: the vulnerable 'Failover Cluster Virtual Driver' is only active on Windows systems with the Failover Clustering role enabled, and cluster interconnects are frequently on isolated/dedicated networks, which narrows the realistic remote-attack surface below what the raw AV:N 9.8 implies. Net: treat as a genuine high-priority patch given automatable + total-impact + pre-auth kernel RCE, but note that the 9.8 likely overstates internet-facing exposure for most environments. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with access to the network segment carrying Windows Failover Cluster traffic sends specially crafted packets to a clustered Windows Server node, triggering a double free (CWE-415) in the Failover Cluster Virtual Driver. Because the flaw is in a kernel-mode driver and requires no authentication or user interaction (PR:N/UI:N), successful memory-corruption exploitation yields code execution at SYSTEM/kernel privilege. No public exploit code is referenced at the time of analysis, so reliable weaponization of the double free would require the attacker to develop the primitive. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026
Unauthenticated remote code execution in the Microsoft Failover Cluster Virtual Driver affects Windows Server 2012 through Windows Server 2025 and Windows 10 1607/1809 installations that have the Failover Clustering role enabled, where a double free (CWE-415) during processing of cluster network traffic allows an attacker to corrupt kernel memory and run code with SYSTEM privileges (CVSS 9.8, AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N). Exposure is conditional rather than universal: the vulnerable driver is only loaded and reachable on clustered nodes, and in well-architected deployments the cluster communication path sits on a dedicated, isolated interconnect, which materially limits remote reach despite the network vector. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no CISA KEV entry, but the vulnerability is fully automatable (SSVC: Exploitation none, Automatable yes, Technical Impact total) and vendor patches are available for all affected builds.
RemediationAI
Apply the vendor-released patch for your build: Windows Server 2025 must be at 10.0.26100.33650 or later; Windows Server 2022 at 10.0.20348.5761 or later; Windows Server 2019 and Windows 10 1809 at 10.0.17763.9376 or later; Windows Server 2016 and Windows 10 1607 at 10.0.14393.9612 or later; Windows Server 2012 R2 at 6.3.9600.23470 or later; and Windows Server 2012 at 6.2.9200.26434 or later (see the Microsoft update guide at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-96864). Patch status is "Vendor-released patch" for the listed builds, so upgrading clustered nodes in a rolling, drain-and-pause fashion is the primary and sufficient fix. Where patching cannot be immediate, the highest-value compensating control is network isolation of the cluster communication path: permit heartbeat/health traffic only between the specific cluster node IPs on the dedicated cluster interconnect and block it from user, management, and WAN-facing segments - the trade-off is that firewalling or re-segmenting the interconnect can cause nodes to mark networks down and trigger unnecessary failovers, so validate cluster network health after any rule change. On hosts that do not genuinely need high availability, removing the Failover Clustering feature entirely eliminates the vulnerable driver and the attack surface at the cost of losing clustering functionality; this is safe for standalone servers and lab images. Do not rely on authentication or credential hardening as a mitigation here - the vector is PR:N, so unauthenticated peers can reach the code path, and only reachability controls or the patch actually reduce risk; also note that because there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, detection engineering should focus on anomalous traffic toward cluster communication ports and unexpected driver crashes (bugchecks) on clustered nodes as a canary for exploitation attempts.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 13 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The affected component is the Failover Cluster Virtual Driver (NetFT), the kernel-mode miniport driver that presents the Failover Cluster Virtual Adapter and carries cluster heartbeat/health traffic between nodes. Because it is a kernel driver operating on frames delivered over the cluster network, its packet parsing and object lifecycle code runs at high privilege, and memory-management defects there translate directly into kernel compromise rather than a sandboxed userland fault. The root cause class is CWE-415 (Double Free): the driver releases the same heap-allocated object twice, which corrupts allocator metadata and can hand an attacker a controlled overlap or reuse of freed memory. In kernel pools this is reliably escalatable in two directions - arbitrary memory corruption leading to code execution in kernel context (SYSTEM), plus the usual crash/denial-of-service outcome when the corruption is not shaped deliberately. The CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H confirms remote reachability, low attack complexity, and no authentication (PR:N) or user interaction (UI:N) required once the driver is reachable, with unchanged scope and full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. The critical prerequisite is deployment context: a standalone Windows Server or Windows 10 host without the Failover Clustering role does not load the vulnerable driver and is not exposed, so the practical attack surface is the set of clustered nodes whose interconnect is routable from an adversary's position. EUVD/EUVD-2026-99786 also records a broad affected build set spanning 6.2.9200 (Server 2012) up to 10.0.26100 (Server 2025), including Server Core installation images where the clustering feature is still present.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Pre-auth, network-reachable kernel double free in a cluster driver yields SYSTEM code execution (PR:N/UI:N, full C/I/A); AC:L retained per vendor data though reliable double-free exploitation can be harder in practice.
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Double free in Microsoft Failover Cluster Virtual Driver allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Executive ViewAI
Microsoft Failover Cluster Virtual Driver on Windows Server 2012 through 2025 and Windows 10 1607/1809 systems with the Failover Clustering role enabled contains a critical unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability that could allow an attacker to fully compromise affected cluster nodes, leading to data loss, service disruption, and lateral movement. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and exposure is limited to clustered nodes on typically isolated networks, but the automatable nature and total technical impact make this a high-priority risk. Patch available per vendor advisory.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
EUVD-2026-99786
GHSA-7qc5-w88m-3mgj
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB