Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate to Coze Studio
-
DeliveryRegister plugin tool with internal/metadata URL
-
ExploitBackend fetches attacker-supplied server URL
-
ExecutionRead returned metadata/credentials
-
ImpactPivot to internal services or cloud account
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires an authenticated Coze Studio account (PR:L) with the ability to register or configure plugin tools; the flaw is that the plugin-tool registration does not validate or restrict the supplied server URL, so the backend will issue HTTP requests to arbitrary attacker-chosen destinations. Exploitation is limited to versions through 0.5.1 and to deployments where the backend network can reach valuable targets - practical impact is highest when the instance runs in a cloud environment with an accessible metadata service (e.g. 169.254.169.254) or has internal-only services reachable from the backend. Impact is read/confidentiality only; no user interaction is needed beyond the attacker's own authenticated actions. |
| Impact | This is a moderate-priority, credentialed SSRF rather than a critical remote-takeover flaw. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N, 7.1) shows network reachability with low complexity but requires authentication (PR:L) and yields confidentiality impact only - no integrity or availability effect, and no CVSS scope/subsequent-system change (SC:N). No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit code are provided, so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis' - this is not confirmed active exploitation. The real risk driver is the impact target: SSRF that can reach cloud metadata endpoints (e.g. IMDS) can expose cloud IAM credentials, which materially raises the practical severity above a generic internal-scan SSRF even though the base metrics stay confidentiality-only. The PR:L requirement (a valid Coze Studio account) is the primary limiting factor and keeps this from being a mass-exploitation candidate. No conflicting signals: the CVSS vector, the CWE-918 classification, and the description are consistent. Net: a genuine issue worth prompt patching for internet- or multi-tenant-exposed deployments, but not an emergency-level widespread threat absent exploitation evidence. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An authenticated Coze Studio user registers a plugin tool and supplies an attacker-chosen server URL (e.g. http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/ or an internal-only service). When the backend invokes the plugin over HTTP, it fetches the attacker-specified endpoint and returns the response body, letting the attacker read cloud instance metadata or internal service data reachable only from the backend network. No public exploit code is identified, but the vulnerable code path (invocation_http.go L127-146) is publicly referenced. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 16, 2026
Server-side request forgery in Coze Studio through version 0.5.1 allows an authenticated user who can register or configure a plugin tool to supply an arbitrary server URL, causing the backend to issue HTTP requests to internal-only destinations on the attacker's behalf. The primary risk is confidentiality rather than code execution: responses from cloud metadata endpoints (for example 169.254.169.254) or other services reachable only from the backend network can be read back through the plugin mechanism, potentially exposing credentials, tokens, and internal service data. The issue is rated 7.1 in the CVSS 4.0 vector published with the CVE, while the independent assessment scores it as a credentialed SSRF (CVSS 3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N) with no integrity or availability impact; no public exploit code was identified at time of analysis and no CISA KEV listing applies, so this is a moderate-priority, credentialed SSRF rather than a critical remote-takeover flaw.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch version was identified in the available data at time of analysis, so remediation must currently rely on mitigation until an upstream fix appears alongside the tracking issue at https://github.com/coze-dev/coze-studio/issues/2711; monitor the project repository and the VulnCheck advisory at https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/coze-studio-through-0.5.1-server-side-request-forgery-via-plugin for a fixed release and upgrade as soon as one is tagged. In the interim, the most effective control is to break the backend's ability to reach sensitive internal destinations: apply egress network policy that blocks the link-local range 169.254.0.0/16 (which cuts off the cloud metadata endpoint 169.254.169.254 and similar), denies RFC1918 and loopback destinations from the Coze Studio container or host, and permits outbound HTTP only to an explicit allowlist of legitimate plugin endpoints - the trade-off is that any legitimate plugin or integration hosted internally will stop working until it is added to the allowlist. Where the deployment is on a cloud provider, enforce IMDSv2 with hop-limit 1 and require tokens so that any residual SSRF cannot retrieve instance credentials, accepting that some legacy SDK tooling may need updating. Restrict who may register or edit plugin tools to a small set of trusted administrators, since exploitation requires an authenticated account with that capability, and audit existing plugin definitions for hardcoded or suspicious server URLs, deleting any that target internal or link-local addresses. Finally, log and alert on backend-originated HTTP requests to private and link-local ranges so attempts are detectable even before a patch is applied; unlike the network controls above, this detection carries no functional side effects.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw is a classic CWE-918 server-side request forgery rooted in the plugin-tool subsystem of Coze Studio. When a user registers a plugin tool, the platform stores a user-supplied server URL and later has the backend process perform HTTP calls against it; the vulnerable code path is in the tool HTTP invocation logic (backend/domain/plugin/service/tool/invocation_http.go, lines 127-146 as cited in the CVE references), where the destination is not validated against an allowlist, a scheme restriction, or a private/link-local address blocklist. Because the request originates from the Coze Studio backend rather than the client, the attacker inherits the backend's network position: loopback interfaces, RFC1918 ranges, internal service meshes, and cloud instance metadata services (notably the link-local address 169.254.169.254) become reachable. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:coze-dev:coze-studio:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* tracks the coze-dev Coze Studio product, and the EUVD entry bounds the exposure to coze-studio versions up to and including 0.5.1. The published CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N) matches the assessed CVSS 3.1 vector in confirming network attack, low privileges required, no user interaction, and high confidentiality impact with no integrity or availability effect - the vulnerability is purely an information-disclosure primitive.
Know when Coze Studio gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Authenticated user (PR:L) triggers backend fetches over the network (AV:N/AC:L); blind/read SSRF exposing metadata credentials gives C:H with no integrity or availability impact and no CVSS scope change.
Primary rating from Vendor (VulnCheck).
CVSS VectorVendor: VulnCheck
DescriptionCVE.org
Coze Studio through 0.5.1 fails to restrict the server URL supplied when registering plugin tools, allowing authenticated users to make the backend fetch internal services. Attackers can construct plugin requests to access cloud metadata endpoints and internal services reachable only from the backend network, reading responses containing sensitive information.
Executive ViewAI
Coze Studio versions through 0.5.1 are affected by a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows authenticated users with plugin configuration privileges to make the backend issue requests to internal-only destinations, including cloud metadata endpoints, which can lead to exposure of credentials, tokens, and internal service data. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and no CISA KEV listing applies, but no vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis means the confidentiality risk remains unmitigated. Leadership should care because this could compromise cloud and internal environments, requiring immediate compensating controls such as restricting plugin configuration access and enforcing network egress filtering.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations include restricting plugin registration and configuration to trusted administrators, implementing network egress filtering to block outbound requests to cloud metadata IP 169.254.169.254 and internal RFC1918 addresses, deploying WAF rules to detect and block SSRF patterns, monitoring logs for anomalous outbound HTTP requests from Coze Studio, disabling the plugin feature if not essential, and enforcing an allowlist of permitted external URLs for plugins.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.
More in Coze Studio
View allRemote code execution in Coze Studio before 0.5.0 allows any registered user to run arbitrary commands through workflow
Coze Studio through 0.5.1 exposes cross-tenant workflow access because its workflow API trusts a client-supplied workflo
Improper authorization in Coze Studio through 0.5.1 lets an authenticated user (CVSS PR:L) abuse the workflow SQL custom
SQL injection in ByteDance coze-studio up to version 0.5.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to manipulate the Execu
EUVD-2026-81058
GHSA-mc6j-cg9w-v46r
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB