Skip to main content

Linux CVE-2026-89722

| EUVDEUVD-2026-76634
2026-09-11 Linux GHSA-chvm-2qwm-x2xc
View
Awaiting Data No severity or threat signals available yet. Label will update when CVSS score is published or threat intelligence arrives. Why: No CVSS yet + weak signal (CWE or non-zero EPSS).
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisCVE.org

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

PCI/sysfs: Fix out-of-bounds read in pci_write_legacy_io()

pci_write_legacy_io() loads 4 bytes from the kernfs write buffer regardless of how many bytes userspace wrote:

if (count != 1 && count != 2 && count != 4) return -EINVAL;

return pci_legacy_write(bus, off, *(u32 *)buf, count);

kernfs_fop_write_iter() allocates the buffer with kmalloc(len + 1), so a 1-byte write to the legacy_io sysfs file allocates 2 bytes and the unconditional u32 load reads up to 2 bytes past the end of the allocation, which KASAN reports as a slab-out-of-bounds read. Similarly, a 2-byte write overreads by 1 byte.

Thus, read only the number of bytes requested using get_unaligned_le16() and get_unaligned_le32() for the 2 and 4 byte cases, interpreting the buffer as little-endian to match the byte ordering of PCI I/O port space.

The PowerPC implementation previously compensated for the generic code's native-endian 32-bit load by shifting the value into place for the 1 and 2 byte cases. The shifts were only correct on big-endian kernels.

On little-endian PowerPC (POWER8 and later), they extracted the wrong bytes, so a 1-byte write wrote an out-of-bounds byte instead of the requested value. On big-endian, the native load also caused out_le16() and out_le32() to reverse the user's bytes on the wire for 2 and 4 byte writes. The little-endian helpers resolve both issues, so the shifts are removed.

No changes are needed for the Alpha platform.

The legacy_io file is root-only and exists only on Alpha and PowerPC, the two architectures that define HAVE_PCI_LEGACY.

Affected VersionsENISA

Linux 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <e892f05f1f790d5721cd8e3c561ed76da7e08bae
Linux 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <dc76258d0132df1d831a5a29758bd448ca9c566e
Linux patch: 7.2.4
Linux 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <7a99e9c7011905734cc2739038f2a224b6be0d1f
Linux 0 <6.18.50
Linux 0 <7.2.4
Linux patch: 7.3-rc1
Linux patch: 6.18.50

Affected Packages

euvd linux fix: 6.18.50, 7.2.4

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Sep 11, 2026 - 21:18 EUVD
CVE Published
Sep 11, 2026 - 19:46 cve.org
UNKNOWN (no severity yet)

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 90% exploitable
Data Quality
1 sources
Confidence: Low

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity Not scored yet
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
No CVSS yet + weak signal (CWE or non-zero EPSS)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy