Skip to main content

GeoVision GV-LPC2211 CVE-2026-88277

| EUVDEUVD-2026-75311 HIGH
OS Command Injection (CWE-78)
2026-09-10 GV GHSA-c6p4-m9j3-jj63
8.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: GV
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain valid ONVIF credentials
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted ONVIF Subscribe request
  3. Exploit
    Inject shell metacharacters in ConsumerReference.Address
  4. Execution
    Trigger unsanitized shell execution
  5. Impact
    Execute arbitrary commands as root

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires a valid ONVIF user account on the target GeoVision GV-LPCLPC2211 running firmware V1.13. The attacker must be able to reach the camera's ONVIF HTTP interface over the network - typically the LAN on port 80 or 8080. No additional elevated privileges beyond basic ONVIF authentication are required; any ONVIF-capable account (including read-only or event-subscription accounts) is sufficient to trigger the injection via the ConsumerReference.Address parameter in a WS-BaseNotification Subscribe request. What limits exploitation: an attacker without any valid ONVIF credential cannot exploit this remotely; network segmentation isolating cameras to a dedicated VLAN without external access further restricts the reachable attacker population. No user interaction by a victim is required once credentials are obtained.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 score of 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) accurately reflects the risk profile. The network attack vector is appropriate since ONVIF operates over HTTP/SOAP, accessible on the LAN or, in poorly segmented networks, from the internet. PR:L acknowledges that any valid ONVIF credential is required - this is not unauthenticated exploitation. In physical security deployments, ONVIF credentials are frequently shared across integrators, VMS platforms, and maintenance personnel, meaning the effective attacker pool is broader than a typical 'authenticated' classification implies. Scope:Unchanged understates the potential impact if the camera is bridged to a corporate network segment. No CISA KEV listing and no identified public exploit code lower the immediate exploitation urgency, but LPC cameras are high-value targets due to their network positioning. EPSS data is absent from the input; risk prioritization should weight the LAN-accessible, low-complexity, root-impact profile heavily against the authentication barrier.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with any valid ONVIF account - such as a VMS integration service account, a contractor credential, or credentials obtained via reuse from another compromised camera - sends a crafted ONVIF Subscribe SOAP request to the camera's HTTP management interface, embedding shell metacharacters in the ConsumerReference.Address field (e.g., a value containing backtick or semicolon sequences). The firmware passes this value unsanitized to a shell command, resulting in arbitrary code execution as root. The attacker can then install a persistent reverse shell, exfiltrate the camera's private keys and stored footage, or pivot into adjacent network segments accessible to the camera.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 10, 2026

Authenticated ONVIF command injection in GeoVision GV-LPC2211 V1.13 allows a low-privileged network attacker to execute arbitrary OS commands as root via the ConsumerReference.Address parameter of the ONVIF event subscription interface. The vulnerability stems from unsanitized user-controlled input passed directly to a shell interpreter on the device. Full device compromise - including credential extraction, persistent backdoor installation, and lateral movement within the physical security network - is achievable by any valid ONVIF account. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and no KEV listing is present.

RemediationAI

Consult the GeoVision security advisory at https://www.geovision.com.tw/cyber_security.php for an updated firmware version addressing this vulnerability - no specific patched firmware version number is independently confirmed in the available data, so treat any version beyond V1.13 as candidate only until verified against the vendor bulletin. As a compensating control, restrict ONVIF service access to trusted VMS hosts only using firewall ACLs or VLAN segmentation, preventing unauthorized network principals from reaching the ONVIF endpoint even with valid credentials. Rotate all ONVIF credentials immediately and enforce unique per-device credentials to limit lateral movement if one set is compromised. Disable ONVIF event subscription functionality entirely if it is not operationally required - this eliminates the vulnerable ConsumerReference.Address attack surface. Monitor camera management traffic for unexpected outbound connections that may indicate post-exploitation activity.

Affected VersionsENISA

GV-LPCLPC2011/2211 1.13

Affected Packages

euvd gv_lpclpc2011_2211 no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

GeoVision GV-LPCLPC2011/2211 is a License Plate Capture (LPC) IP camera used in parking, access control, and perimeter security deployments. ONVIF (Open Network Video Interface Forum) is a widely adopted industry standard protocol enabling interoperability between IP cameras and video management systems over SOAP/HTTP. The ConsumerReference.Address field is part of the ONVIF WS-BaseNotification subscription mechanism, used to specify where event notifications should be delivered. The affected firmware version 1.13 fails to sanitize this field before passing it to a shell command (CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command). The CPE cpe:2.3:a:geovision_inc.:gv-lpclpc2011/2211:*:*:*:*:* covers both GV-LPCLPC2011 and GV-LPCLPC2211 models. Root-level execution means the attacker inherits full device control with no privilege boundary remaining.

Know when Geovision gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (GV) PRIMARY 8.8 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Network-accessible ONVIF interface, any valid account sufficient (PR:L), no interaction needed; root execution yields full C/I/A impact on the device.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (GV).

CVSS VectorVendor: GV

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

GeoVision GV-LPC2211 V1.13 allows an authenticated ONVIF user to inject shell commands through ConsumerReference.Address and execute arbitrary commands as root.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

GeoVision GV-LPC2211 network camera (V1.13) contains a command injection vulnerability allowing any user with valid ONVIF credentials to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on the device. An attacker could extract stored credentials, install persistent backdoors, and pivot laterally within the physical security network. Organizations operating this camera model face complete compromise of their physical security infrastructure.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Implement network segmentation to restrict ONVIF interface access to trusted administrative networks only; require VPN authentication before ONVIF access; disable ONVIF protocol if the feature is not actively used; enforce strong, unique credentials for all ONVIF accounts; deploy intrusion detection rules to alert on suspicious shell metacharacters in ONVIF event subscription parameters; monitor all device command execution logs and escalate any activity from ONVIF service accounts to the security team.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 73% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
specialized LPC camera, niche physical-security deployments
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

44
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

CVE-2024-11120 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 15

Certain EOL GeoVision devices have an OS Command Injection vulnerability. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulne

CVE-2024-6047 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 17

Certain EOL GeoVision devices fail to properly filter user input for the specific functionality. Rated critical severity

CVE-2019-11064 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 29

A vulnerability of remote credential disclosure was discovered in Advan VD-1 firmware versions up to 230. Rated critical

CVE-2019-13408 HIGH POC
7.5 Aug 29

A relative path traversal vulnerability found in Advan VD-1 firmware versions up to 230. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5),

CVE-2019-13407 MEDIUM POC
6.1 Aug 29

A XSS found in Advan VD-1 firmware versions up to 230. Rated medium severity (CVSS 6.1), this vulnerability is remotely

CVE-2023-23059 CRITICAL
9.8 May 04

An issue was discovered in GeoVision GV-Edge Recording Manager 2.2.3.0 for windows, which contains improper permissions

CVE-2026-4606 CRITICAL
10.0 Mar 23

GV Edge Recording Manager (ERM) v2.3.1 improperly executes application components with SYSTEM-level privileges, allowing

CVE-2023-3638 CRITICAL
9.8 Jul 19

In GeoVision GV-ADR2701 cameras, an attacker could edit the login response to access the web application. Rated critical

CVE-2020-3931 CRITICAL
9.8 Jul 08

Buffer overflow exists in Geovision Door Access Control device family, an unauthenticated remote attacker can execute ar

CVE-2026-88285 CRITICAL
9.4 Sep 10

Unauthenticated remote control of GeoVision GV-LPC2211 license-plate-capture cameras (firmware V1.13) is possible becaus

CVE-2026-108984 HIGH
7.5 Oct 19

GeoVision GV-ASmanager's GeoWebServer.exe web service is vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow that allows remote,

CVE-2026-103098 HIGH
7.5 Oct 02

GV-Eye V3.6.0 transmits a sensitive key as a URL parameter over unencrypted HTTP, so the key travels across the network

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy