Skip to main content

Snipe-IT CVE-2026-86734

| EUVDEUVD-2026-72870 HIGH
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400)
2026-09-08 VulnCheck GHSA-pqpw-8v7c-2fw4
7.1
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulnCheck
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate with low-privilege account
  2. Delivery
    POST /account/accept/{id} with oversized note
  3. Exploit
    CommonMark parser consumes PHP worker CPU
  4. Execution
    Repeat in parallel to exhaust worker pool
  5. Impact
    Application unavailable to all users

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Resource consumption limits
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Impact

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

The attacker must hold a valid authenticated Snipe-IT user account (PR:L). No elevated or administrative privileges are required - any account capable of submitting an asset acceptance acknowledgement can reach the vulnerable endpoint. The vulnerability is triggered by submitting an oversized note value to POST /account/accept/{acceptance}; no special deployment mode, non-default configuration, or specific platform is required beyond a running Snipe-IT instance before 8.7.1. Exploitation is limited by the authentication barrier and by network-level access to the Snipe-IT instance, which is often internal-only in enterprise deployments.

Impact

The CVSS 4.0 score of 7.1 with VA:H accurately reflects a meaningful but bounded availability threat. The attack requires a low-privilege authenticated account, which limits exploitation to insiders or accounts obtained through phishing or credential reuse - an attacker without a valid login cannot trigger this. The synchronous rendering model means repeated requests could sustain CPU exhaustion across multiple PHP-FPM workers, potentially degrading the application for all users. Even a modestly staffed IT team relying on Snipe-IT for daily asset management operations would feel the impact acutely, and the attacker needs only one valid account to cause disproportionate disruption. EPSS data is not provided in the input; no CISA KEV listing and no public exploit code have been identified, placing real-world exploitation risk in the opportunistic-insider category rather than active threat-actor campaigns. The dual-fix approach (input cap plus commonmark library upgrade) implies the library itself had a latent complexity-based DoS behavior that the application's lack of validation exposed.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with a valid low-privilege Snipe-IT account - whether an insider or one acquired via phishing - crafts a POST request to /account/accept/{acceptance} with a note field containing several megabytes of CommonMark-formatted text. Submitted repeatedly in parallel, each request blocks a PHP-FPM worker during synchronous markdown rendering, exhausting the worker pool and making the application unresponsive to all users. No public proof-of-concept code has been identified, but the technique requires only standard HTTP tooling.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 08, 2026

Denial of service in Snipe-IT before 8.7.1 allows authenticated users to exhaust PHP worker CPU by submitting arbitrarily large values in the note field of the POST /account/accept/{acceptance} endpoint. The unbounded input is passed directly to synchronous CommonMark markdown rendering during acceptance notification email generation, consuming worker CPU proportional to input size on every request. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, but the attack is straightforward for any authenticated user and requires no special privileges beyond a valid account.

RemediationAI

Upgrade Snipe-IT to version 8.7.1, which includes two coordinated fixes: a server-side validation rule capping the note field at 1,000 characters in AcceptanceController.php, and an upgrade of league/commonmark to ^2.9.0, identified in the commit as the primary fix. See GHSA-4vcv-fc5x-jjwv at https://github.com/grokability/snipe-it/security/advisories/GHSA-4vcv-fc5x-jjwv and the patch at https://github.com/grokability/snipe-it/commit/66770cfe20cb135e2b7022c7a83d01e6783c914a. If immediate patching is not possible, consider placing the application behind a WAF or reverse proxy with request-body size limits on the /account/accept/* path, though this does not address the root cause and may interfere with legitimate long notes. Rate-limiting authenticated requests to acceptance endpoints is a low-disruption compensating control that reduces sustained CPU exhaustion without blocking normal use.

Affected VersionsENISA

snipe-it 0 <8.7.1

Affected Packages

euvd snipe_it fix: 8.7.1

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Snipe-IT is a PHP-based open-source IT asset management application developed by grokability (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:grokability:snipe-it:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*). The vulnerable code path is in AcceptanceController.php, which processes asset acceptance acknowledgements. The note field submitted via POST was passed without length validation directly into the league/commonmark parser for synchronous rendering as part of acceptance notification emails. CommonMark parsing is computationally non-trivial and scales with input size, making it a viable CPU exhaustion vector under CWE-400 (Uncontrolled Resource Consumption). The fix involves two coordinated changes: server-side input validation capping note values at 1,000 characters, and upgrading league/commonmark to ^2.9.0, which the commit comment identifies as the primary fix - suggesting commonmark itself received a relevant hardening update.

Know when PHP gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulnCheck) PRIMARY 7.1 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 6.5 MEDIUM

Authenticated network access (PR:L, AV:N) triggers CPU exhaustion; no confidentiality or integrity impact applies.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulnCheck).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulnCheck

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
None
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

Snipe-IT before 8.7.1 fails to validate the length of the note field in the POST /account/accept/{acceptance} endpoint, allowing authenticated users to submit unbounded input that reaches synchronous CommonMark rendering. Attackers can submit large note values to exhaust PHP worker CPU and cause denial of service through resource exhaustion in the markdown parsing pipeline.

Technical POC Analysis

Two-layer bug, mapped to CWE-400 (Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) and CWE-1284 (Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input).

Full technical POC analysis - root cause, step-by-step exploitation and patch breakdown - is part of the Pro and Business plans.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Snipe-IT asset management systems before version 8.7.1 are vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks by any authenticated user. Attackers can trigger excessive server resource consumption through the asset acceptance workflow, rendering the system unavailable and disrupting asset inventory tracking and IT operations for all users.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 78% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
popular open-source IT asset management tool in SMB/enterprise
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

36
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

More in PHP

View all
CVE-2019-11043 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 28

In PHP versions 7.1.x below 7.1.33, 7.2.x below 7.2.24 and 7.3.x below 7.3.11 in certain configurations of FPM setup it

CVE-2012-1823 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 11

sapi/cgi/cgi_main.c in PHP before 5.3.12 and 5.4.x before 5.4.2, when configured as a CGI script (aka php-cgi), does not

CVE-2016-1555 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 21

(1) boardData102.php, (2) boardData103.php, (3) boardDataJP.php, (4) boardDataNA.php, and (5) boardDataWW.php in Netgear

CVE-2018-11138 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 31

The '/common/download_agent_installer.php' script in the Quest KACE System Management Appliance 8.0.318 is accessible by

CVE-2024-11680 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 26

ProjectSend versions prior to r1720 are affected by an improper authentication vulnerability. Rated critical severity (C

CVE-2025-49113 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Jun 02

Roundcube Webmail contains a critical PHP object deserialization vulnerability (CVE-2025-49113, CVSS 9.9) that allows au

CVE-2017-9841 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 27

Util/PHP/eval-stdin.php in PHPUnit before 4.8.28 and 5.x before 5.6.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP c

CVE-2025-0108 HIGH POC
8.8 Feb 12

Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS management web interface contains an authentication bypass allowing unauthenticated attackers

CVE-2021-25298 HIGH POC
8.8 Feb 15

Nagios XI version xi-5.7.5 is affected by OS command injection. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is re

CVE-2021-25296 HIGH POC
8.8 Feb 15

Nagios XI version xi-5.7.5 is affected by OS command injection. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is re

CVE-2013-4983 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Sep 10

The get_referers function in /opt/ws/bin/sblistpack in Sophos Web Appliance before 3.7.9.1 and 3.8 before 3.8.1.1 allows

CVE-2023-6553 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 15

The Backup Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 1

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy